Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone here heard of the new drug testing - retinal scans?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:01 PM
Original message
Anyone here heard of the new drug testing - retinal scans?
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 03:02 PM by Taverner
(more info: http://www.physorg.com/news6134.html )

Basically The test works like this:

"...first you must be 'baselined' into the machine 3 times. You look into the machine and there is a green dot at the end of a short tube. You line up your eye with the green dot, then you press a green button to begin the test. The machine will make a high-pitched sound letting you know it's found your retina. Then the green light moves back and forth from right to left 6-8 times (this is to track eye movement as well as scan the retina). The dot then returns to the middle for 8 seconds giving you time to blink and relubricate your eye (you cannot blink from the time of the sound to this time or you will fault the test and have to retake it). After the 8 seconds the small dot is in the center again and 4 large green dots flash around it. The large dots are 1/2 second flashes and they flash another 6-8 times (this checks for pupil dilation). If you did the test correctly the machine will make another high-pitched sound telling you that you took the test correctly (doesn't mean you passed....). If at any time you move or blink during the test the machine will make an error sound and you will have to retest.

After you get through the test then your results are printed. The results either say low-risk (your eye tested close enough to your baseline so you are at 'low risk' of being negative aka you passed) or high-risk (your eye was not close enough to your baseline). If you low-risk, you have passed an you are done. If you are high-risk then you must wait 5 minutes and retest. If after you retest you get high risk for the 2nd time, you fail the retinal scan and then they cross reference it with a lab-urine test (very strict urine test the also tests for dilutes, additives, adulterants, etc.)."

Now here is the really bad part about it - its not testing for substances, but if you've ever been "high" lately. So if you take something as innocuous as Cough Syrup or Tylenol PM you could fail the test.

How can something like this be legal?

They are standardizing on these in Florida (at the cost of $25K per machine) and I can't see how this isn't a massive invasion of privacy as well as putting thousands at risk of false positives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. So wait.. Drugs alter your retina in some way?
That's a new one to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They make your eye follow a dot
The theory goes that your eye won't follow the dot quick enough if you've taken anything

If you ask me, however, I smell a big ass unconstitutional rat.

Ever pumped weights? You get the same effect if you shred yourself weightlifting as you would by shooting heroin. Why do you think Iggy Pop is such a weightlifter these days - now that he's off H.

That could result in a false positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have had a torn retina and hemmorhage in one eye, and a hole in the retina in the other eye.
There's no way in heck I'd be able to stand this test. I have permanent (dots) floaters from the scar tissue...how would my eyes be able to detect just one dot in the middle?

There must be a lot of people who have the same issue...torn retinas occur a lot more as people age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Knowing the ganja grabbers they wouldn't care
They'd rather screen out thousands of retina torn individuals than hire ONE SINGLE POTSMOKER!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't do drugs but..
I would refuse to take such a test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. I used to say that but then all hospitals started testing all new employees
I wouldn't have been able to continue my career if I didn't submit to urine testing. I did draw another line in the sand, though. I will not pay for an obligatory urine (or retinal) scan. One of my travel companies tried that and it was one step too far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. What utter shit
Get the fuck out of peoples lives already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. drug testing is an invasion of privacy
and should be outlawed, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes. Totally. I refuse to apply for any job that I have to test for.
I walked out on an interview at a certain 3-letter acronym company you all know because that was the next stage of the interview.

The hiring manager was like "Seriously? I shouldn't say this but you did a great job in the tech screen and interview - - and we can compensate with salary - I have that leverage."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. yep, I had something similar happen to me
went as far as an offer from a large ins co, but the drug test was the deal breaker. I didn't tell them why, just that I couldn't accept the offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. How do you ever find a job? Every job I applied for in the last 20 years had a drug test
requirement. All they tested for was MJ but if you didn't take the piss test you just weren't considered. They tested everyone, even the guy they hored as VP of finance. I honestly don't know of any company that doesn't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Most tech companies in the Silicon Valley don't test
The company I work for, and its pretty big - you'd know it, doesn't. I've worked for 5 other tech companies, and none of them tested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. It's sure not the same in the east! My husband is retired not but
7 years ago when he went to work for a supermarket as a meat cutter he had to take a piss test. You can't imagine how many people who were supposed to start working there and were declined because they failed the damn test. Same thing at the co where I worked. The last job I had was in Tx. I was Dir. of Finance. We had several mfg. plants and an office. MANY people would get hired because they had the right experience and background, but failed the damn test and were gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. To the birfers and teabaggers who decry fascism : THIS IS FASCISM
Drug tests

Such an invasion into your life - its completely immoral, unethical and illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Yeah tech companies tend not to test from what I've heard and seen
In my opinion it's because they know that smart people tend to experiment ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. That, and techs are definitely social libertarians
Whether they're Republican or Democrat, most are "just leave me the FUCK ALONE!"

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. refuse to be tested, no matter who is asking
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 03:10 PM by imdjh
My lawyer for my DUI (decades ago) said I blew it when I backed down and finally agreed to be tested at the police station. Prior to that, I had refused to protect my rights under the Fourth Amendment. I was fucked up, but I remembered my Amendments. Anyway, they basically made it sound like it was a certainty I would lose my license (and therefore my livelihood) if I refused so I took it. Stupid me. It worked out OK but my lawyer said it would have been easier, cheaper, and shorter if I had stood my ground. I maintained that I had been coerced, lawyer said, "Tough shit on that one."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Is this in CA? Over here you get an automatic "guilty" on DUI's if you refuse
And I'm dead serious on that

And yes, its totally screwed up, as are most "Feel Good/ Anti something" legislation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You get guilty of DUI? How is that possible? Or do you get guilty of refusal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not sure how, but this happened to two friends of mine
Both thought they were constitutionally protected, and when they went to court, they were slapped with DUIs in both cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Implied consent
is how they do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. in VA you lose your licence for a year automatically if you refuse to submit to the tests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. FFS
Someone somewhere is making a lot of money with this BS


:grr:




:grr:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes indeed
Fear Sells, and everyone's buying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. The War On Drugs is a Carte Blanc Card to Invade privacy..
it allows the "nose of the Camel under the tent". Once the drug dog barks an "alert", it allows them to rip your car apart and take anything you have.. no questions asked.

I know I will get flamed here on DU as being a crack dealer Meth addict... but I hope some of the flamers here on DU get stopped in a traffic checkpoint and get hauled away for having a glass of wine on their breath. Serves you right for drinking wine at dinner... jerks...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Exactly - and it's too often used as an excuse to do all kinds of unconstitutional things
Like take away property, for example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. "standardizing on these in Florida" link for this please? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
30. so you just need to make sure you are high for your baseline tests.... who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC