|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Nuclear Unicorn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:35 PM Original message |
Again?! Another Admin Member Resigns Over Con Yelping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Thank Glenn Beck and his army of fucktards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. The administration should have turned down his offer to resign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I think a lot of them resign because.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think it's a good sign; it shows that the administration does not tolerate politics as usual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Clarity requires cleanleness...better to let go of wrong doers than to attempt stonewalling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. So, Democrats are required to hire only flawless human beings while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I like having higher standards than the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. I like having the Democratic iParty in power. I do not support any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. Wow. Urging artists to create for their president. Why wasn't he guillotined? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. The NEA exists for the government to promote the arts, not the other way around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. The NEA used to give out grants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 07:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Indeed, but I don't think they were predicated on subject matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 09:27 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. That happens all the time. Govt funded Public art for example, is often themed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. "promote the agenda" is the key. It's called politicizing the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. It's true. The difference is if a Bush appointee tried this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
11. NPR had a story about this and I wondered if this was going to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
26. The administration should be congratulated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. Let's be fair: if a Bush appointee said what he said on that call, we would be calling for his/her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. But he/she would not have resigned. That's the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. so shouldn't we rejoice that in this administration when wrong approaches are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. And we never would have gotten it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DebbieCDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
18. This is what happens when you let them get away with it once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muntrv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
21. Obama, quit giving in to the repukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libertas1776 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
23. So am I to believe, by the logic of this resignation, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nuclear Unicorn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
25. @ Post#11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC