|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ashling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 08:23 PM Original message |
Is de-funding ACORN an unconstitutional “bill of attainder”? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. Very good information! Thank you for digging this up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 08:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Actually, one of my Con Law student's posted it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Piewhacket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 10:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Thanks for the note on blackboard. I notice it has a few black eyes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 06:52 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Didn't know about the patent thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Piewhacket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 11:11 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Yeah, the open source community, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. I love the prof's conclusion. Very funny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. Nah. It's going to be Faux that's going to be scandal-ridden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not if worded appropriately, unfortunately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. NOTHING has been proven whatsoever... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Congress acted too quickly, and with too much political heat, to produce a legislative record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 07:20 AM Response to Original message |
10. Revenge is always so messy. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
11. It may be illegal, but not because it's a bill of attainder nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
12. Looks like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC