|
I was also interested to see that Mr. Carville, a mere lad of 64 (same as I am), has made fun of the age of the Tea Party attendees. He mockingly noted that their average age was - quote - "what, like 72.4 years?" So, now the Democrats don't think the opinions of senior citizens are worth anything more than ridicule? That's a change, too. Not a good one. I have seen other Democratic commentators making mock of the fact that the people at the Tea Parties were overwhelmingly white. So, are we back to saying people's political views only count if you have skin of a certain color or are of a certain race? I don't like the sound of that. The liberal Democrats might want to rethink this. Contempt for the ordinary citizen is just not American. And it does not win elections.
So what's Ben complaining about? Our eye sight? Sorry Ben if the tea party was filled with old, bitter angry and nearly uniformly white people. Many carrying racist signs! Ben doesn't like the sound of the... truth. Ouch. I mean Ben you could have argued that the party drew on more than one small segment of society. Instead you just pointed out, not that the statements weren't true. Just that they aren't convenient... to you. Democratic ideas appeal to more than old, white people that want to return to the 1950s. Including us old, white people that are liberal! Conservatives are expounding on ideals that appeal to only one small segment of society and don't want to even hear from the rest of us, who they have no respect for, and liberals have contempt for ordinary citizens.
You know what contempt is: Saying that an "ordinary citizen" in one that only come in one races, one colors, one religion and one age group. Ben Stein doesn't like that "ordinary citizen" isn't Archie Bunker in modern America anymore. Claiming that those tea parties represented ordinary citizens is an insult, and a racist one at that.
|