Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And now a word from the Grammar Police:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 03:59 PM
Original message
And now a word from the Grammar Police:
It's and its are NOT interchangeable

It's means "it is"

Its X is the possessive for it as in "The X belonging to it".

Thanks and we now return you to your regularly scheduled program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. It don't matter.
Er, I mean, it doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. This thread could also be titled "Why the foniks method doesn't work"
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 05:50 PM by Occulus
I hate hate hate phonics-based reading education. It makes people think they can sound out the word in English, in every case.

You can't.

two/too
they're/their/there
its/it's
your/you're
lose/loose

Of course, the overwhelming prevalence of tiny keyboards on phones is also giving us:

4 instead of 'for'
U instead of 'you'

and other things.

I'm sure speakers of ASL are bewildered at this point. The ASL grammar seems to be seeping into nonstandard 'lttl kbd' "English":

"went to store"
"rented video, Batman"

etc. C twitter 4 moar. ;)

Fifty years from now, English as a written language among the 'commons' will be very different from what it is today. None of this is an inherently bad thing; English, as we all should know, is a living language, and it can, has, and will continue to change, sometimes radically. It's just that, to see it happen so fast.... it's discombobulating, to say the least.

I used to pride myself on my writing skills, but lately, most people (especially younger people) don't have the patience to read something written in a coherent and grammatically-correct manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #47
78. Apparently these shortened texting terms are making their way to papers
and some teachers are putting their foot down.

Yes, your example of 4, U, LOL and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #47
85. We ESOL teachers are also seeing the disappearance of the 3rd person singular in the
present tense. The immigrants I tutor invariably say "he go."

And some of my students will also use the present tense when speaking in the past tense. My Chinese student does this and I correct her each time. She also mixes up "he" and "she" so conversations with her are difficult. But I think she has calcified bad habits and is able to get away with it just enough to get by...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Glenn Beck made you write that, didn't he?
What are you, some kind of anti-American grammarer or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. my favorites are the folks who think "lose" and" loose" are
interchangable! That drives me crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. My pet peeve is the misuse of "their" & "they're."
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 04:22 PM by MoonRiver
:banghead:

Edited for grammar, and not proof reading: :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. that, and your vs. you're

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Yep, that's also an infuriating one.
And they happen so much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
94. Your vs. you're? Your kidding me!
People still get that one wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
107. They're, their,
and there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
119. Their, they're and there. Yes, that makes me crazy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Yeah, talk about lose cannons!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
80. That's "canons". :D
:D



The "primate of Brazil" is not in the pic, apparently. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #80
86. Oh, yes, the Pachelbel Canon in D. Beautiful... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. I think that those two are used here incorrectly as a spoof on
the repukes who seem to ALWAYS get them mixed up.

Seriesly.

:P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Actually, they are not.I have seen this usage in some very well written
articles by some professional writers. And it appears everywhere on the nets in "serious" conversations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
75. Putting quotes around "serious" tells me all I need to know.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. A blog devoted to this subject:-
(Not just it's/its but apostrophe abuse in general)

http://www.apostropheabuse.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Your last sentence is not grammatically correct.
It should be written as:

"Thanks. We now return you to your regularly scheduled program."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Que?
Two sentences joined by the coordinate conjunction "and", no? I don't think you have to break the two sentences up to be grammatically correct. It's just a choice of style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. But that's two sentences.
Now, we'll have to double your sentence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainngirl Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
39. and if you want to get REALLY anal...
you would add a hyphen to say: "regularly-scheduled program." tee hee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. Actually, no hyphen there
Hyphens are not used after an adverb ending in "ly".

Sincerely,
Another Grammar Cop :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. You are SCARY! You sprung a new one on me!
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 06:50 PM by Sal Minella
So it's "frequent-flier miles" but "frequently delayed flights."

Never too old to learn. Hope I can remember this longer than ten mi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Exactly!
Gold star for you. :)

Hell, I'm a professional writer and editor, and stuff still gets by me on a regular basis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainngirl Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. edited
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:42 PM by Rainngirl
You are correct! My bad about adverbs (although they ARE used when the adverb is connected to a participle)! They are also generally used when the second word ends in "ed" or "self" is the first word, and a whole bunch of other compound words. Okay, I'm done now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #49
104. Why does America hate the adverb?
This is tangential, but I have come to loathe the contemporary (to put a non-ageist spin on it) habit of dropping the "-ly" suffix from adverbs.

Please don't ask me, "Serious?!" unless my name is Lee. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #104
112. I guess "Serious?" could be short for "Are you serious?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
113. I think 'you' is redundant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. People who care about getting things right are not police, nazis or anything else...
They're just not illiterate idiots, nor especially interested in stroking the (deservedly) fragile egos of those who are.

There's actually quite a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Picky, picky. What next, complaining about having a word's letters in the proper order?
If something is important enough to be communicated, then it should at least be given enough care to be communicated properly. To do otherwise communicates a lot about the writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Before you sit back and put your feet up,
could you please take the birch twigs to people who think "where" and "were" are socially acceptable variant spellings of the same word, and also to those who think "women" and "woman" are interchangeable.

For today, I'm not even mentioning "role-roll," "cite-site," "toe-tow," "reign-rein," or "diffuse-defuse."

Not mentioning those today. Just were-where and woman-women for today.

Than Kew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Don't mention marshall - martial either.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
50. "A women" drives me NUTS
How hard can it be to remember that the plural of "man" is "men", then just add "wo-" to those? :banghead:

And may I also add another big pet peeve of mine: "Lightening" is not the flash that comes before thunder. That's "lightning." "Lightening" is what the sky does just before the sun rises.

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
122. "affect -effect"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. There is no such word as 'alot'. If one says an item is 'very unique'
does that mean it is even more rare than 'one of a kind'?

If some object is in 'close proximity' to another, are there other objects that are 'far proximity'?

If we name a list of three or four items or topics, and the last one is introduced as 'last, but not least' why do we not start off the list with 'first, but not foremost'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. Just because it's uniquer doesn't mean that it's the uniquest.
And lashed but not leased, what about which-that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #29
87. I think you misspelled "uniquiest" but I don't want to seem overly critical . . .
I blush to admit being clueless about the "which-that" you mention -- would you please give me an example?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. F^%k
the grammar police and the spelling horse they rode in on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Actually, the spelling horse threw a shoe, so ...
they rode in on the pronunciation pony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
70. As long as
the Comma Cobra leaves me the hell alone I'm cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Martial, not marshall
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 04:16 PM by Individualist
would have, not would of
there when the poster means their
your when the poster means you're

When I read those, it's like hearing fingernails on a chalkboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Oooops! I didn't read far enough into the thread
before posting about marshall - martial. Sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
62. "would of" is one of my many pet peeves
your, you're
their, there, they're
would of

We're growing a nation of people unable to handle rules of communication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Kudos" is not the plural of a "Kudo"
& for christ's sake, it's pronounced Koo-doss, not Koo-doze.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. The poor apostrophe.
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 04:24 PM by Lancer
It's so hard for so many to remember its purpose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. Then they should read the Acts of the Apostrophes.
If they don't, then I'm colon them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. How obstensively farcicle of you . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. My grammar never belonged to the police.
Neither did my grampar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Alternative grammar and spelling
are so hip and cool. Don't cha just luv em?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. NOOOOO NOT THE GRAMMAR POLICE
:-)

By the way my bane is sit and seat, don't ask
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
93. I LOVE The Grammar Police!
I just love the grammar police.

Its just a joy to sea there work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. Should have, not should of........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. I have known writers who are often confused with that one.
I sometimes forget and apostrophe the possessive when I'm in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CurtEastPoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. But isn't it the principal of it that matters? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. . . .
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 04:44 PM by Sal Minella
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. ***BBBZZZZ*** - punctuation, please
It's and its are NOT interchangeable

"It's" and "its" are NOT interchangeable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. !!!
:spray:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. I'd like to add: It's not "whinning", it's "whining"
If there's a different spelling outside the U.S., my apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
36. Proper use of grammar and correct spelling are signs that you are an elitist
The hoi polloi doesn't have time for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. Your to series. Losen up you're tie or yul loose yur mine.
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 04:38 PM by HCE SuiGeneris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm gonna possess your ass on my fist -in your face
Go away! 'Batin!



I love Idiocracy...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Call Me Wesley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. Your' must be oligarhy!
Its the truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
43. Technically that's an ORTHOGRAPHICAL (spelling) mistake, not a grammar mistake.
It's a very common mistake caused by the fact that "it" inflects for the genitive case in the regular manner, and the regular genitive is the -'s ending everywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I classify apostrophe abuse as grammar not spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
45. I used to do some editing of press releases sent into the local paper
And the its/it's mistake was one of the most common, along with their, there, they're confusion and to/too.

Somebody didn't pay attention in fourth grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
46. Thank You! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
48. I notice some illiterate unrec'd you.
When I last looked you had 3 recs, now you're down to 2. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DawgHouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
51. You're gonna love September 24, National Punctuation Day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
54. What no ode to my spell check???
http://www7.taosnet.com/ebear/ode.html

I have a spelling checquer
It came with my pea sea
It plane lee marks four my revue
Miss steaks aye can knot sea

Eye ran this poem threw it
Your sure real glad two no
It's vary polished in it's weigh
My checker tolled me sew

A checker is a bless sing
It freeze yew lodes of thyme
It helps me awl stiles two reed
And aides me when aye rime

To rite with care is quite a feet
Of witch won should be proud
And wee mussed dew the best wee can
Sew flaws are knot aloud

And now bee cause my spelling
is checked with such grate flare
Their are know faults with in my site
Of nun eye am a wear

Each frays comes posed up on my screen
Eye trussed to be a joule
The checker poured o'er every word
To cheque sum spelling rule

That's why aye brake in two averse
By righting wants too pleas
Sow now ewe sea why aye dew prays
Such soft wear for pea seas


Another Version:

Ode to a Spell Checker
I have a spelling checker
I disk covered four my PC.
It plane lee marks four my revue
Miss steaks aye can knot see.

Eye ran this poem threw it.
Your sure real glad two no.
Its very polished in its weigh,
My checker tolled me sew.

A checker is a blessing.
It freeze yew lodes of thyme.
It helps me right awl stiles two reed,
And aides me when aye rime.

Each frays comes posed up on my screen
Eye trussed too bee a joule.
The checker pours o'er every word
To cheque sum spelling rule.

Bee fore wee rote with checkers
Hour spelling was inn deck line,
Butt now when wee dew have a laps,
Wee are not maid too wine.

And now bee cause my spelling
Is checked with such grate flare,
There are know faults in awl this peace,
Of nun eye am a wear.

To rite with care is quite a feet
Of witch won should be proud,
And wee mussed dew the best wee can,
Sew flaws are knot aloud.

That's why eye brake in two averse
Caws Eye dew want too please.
Sow glad eye yam that aye did bye
This soft wear four pea seas.
http://people.usd.edu/~bwjames/humor/spell.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
55. Thank you, boss ddeclue
I'll try to get my mind right.

}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
56. Your First Two Sentences Are Missing Periods.
Oh, and your post is really sad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
57. 90% of the time, LEAVE THE APOSTROPHE OUT
Unless you're writing a resume or something equally formal, there's no reason to use apostrophes.

Lots of communiques omit punctuation. It is only the POSITIVE mistake that raises people's hackles.

If you don't know, let it go. But you should know after reading this OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Overall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
59. My pet peeve is misuse of the conditional--
People using, "if I was president..." instead of, "if I were president..."

I think using "was" in a conditional clause is becoming more acceptable, but I don't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
60. Its confusing
:evilgrin: There their
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
61. Cop Talk - My partner and myself......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
63. Your write. People our always doing that. Their sew stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
64. If we're correcting...
"Its X" is the possessive for it as in "The X belonging to it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yawnmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #64
109.  "Its X" is the possessive for it, as in "The X belonging to it."
I believe a comma should be in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
65. "would of"
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 08:14 PM by Control-Z
Using "would of" instead of "would have" is a common mistake made here on DU, and it drives me crazy.

What would of happened?
What would have happened?

Edit: Oops. I should have read the thread before complaining! I have a question, though, for anyone who can give me a simple answer. I am never sure how to use affect and effect. Thanks.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. The verb affect leaves an effect. It happens first and a comes before e.
I thought it would affect me but it didn't have much of an effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #71
90. Why, thank you.
Your clear and simple explanation is exactly what I was hoping for. I must have missed school the day they taught this lesson. Lol. Seriously, though, not knowing which word to use has always bothered me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. por nada nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #71
116. Effect can, on occasion, be used as a verb.
As a verb, it means "to bring about", as in: to effect change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #116
125. you are correct. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #65
72. Affect vs effect
Home » Library»Grammar»Style and Usage
Affect vs. Effect Grammar Rules
From > http://www.yourdictionary.com/grammar-rules/affect-effect-grammar.html

In order to understand the correct situation in which to use the word affect or effect, the first thing one must do is have a clear understanding of what each word means. According to yourDictionary.com, the word Affect means:

1. To have an influence on or effect a change in: Inflation affects the buying power of the dollar.
2. To act on the emotions of; touch or move.
3. To attack or infect, as a disease: Rheumatic fever can affect the heart.

Effect

The word effect has a different meaning. Here is the meaning according to yourDictionary.com:

1. Something brought about by a cause or agent; a result.
2. The power to produce an outcome or achieve a result; influence: The drug had an immediate effect on the pain. The government's action had no effect on the trade imbalance.
3. A scientific law, hypothesis, or phenomenon: the photovoltaic effect. |
4. Advantage; avail: used her words to great effect in influencing the jury.
5. The condition of being in full force or execution: a new regulation that goes into effect tomorrow.
6.
7. Something that produces a specific impression or supports a general design or intention: The lighting effects emphasized the harsh atmosphere of the drama.
8. A particular impression: large windows that gave an effect of spaciousness.
9. Production of a desired impression: spent lavishly on dinner just for effect.
10. The basic or general meaning; import: He said he was greatly worried, or words to that effect.

Grammar Rules for Affect and Effect

Now that we have the two definitions, how do we know which word to use? Here are a few suggestions to keep in mind:

1. If you are talking about a result, then use the word "effect."

* Example: What effect did the loss have on the team?

2. It is appropriate to use the word "effect" if one of these words is used immediately before the word: into, no, take, the, any, an, or and.

* Example: The prescribed medication had no effect on the patient's symptoms.
* Example: In analyzing a situation, it is important to take the concepts of cause and effect into consideration.

3. If you want to describe something that was caused or brought about, the right word to use is effect.

* Example: The new manager effected some positive changes in the office. (This means that the new manager caused some positive changes to take place in the office.)

4. Affect can be used as a noun to describe facial expression.

* Example: The young man with schizophrenia had a flat affect.
* Example: The woman took the news of her husband's sudden death with little affect.

5. Affect can also be used as a verb. Use it when trying to describe influencing someone or something rather than causing it.

* Example: How does the crime rate affect hiring levels by local police forces?
* Example: The weather conditions will affect the number of people who come to the county fair this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #72
91. I also read somewhere
that the words are interchangeable, at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #65
105. "Yeah, yeah. Could of, would of, should of!"
Kill me now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #105
117. I think this results from
the misuse of the contractions could've, would've, should've.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #117
127. I think you're right.
But it still grates on the ear/eye. ;)

Here in Northern CA, we have to deal with both "hella" and "hell of." I'm not quite sure which causes me to twitch more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
66. IMHO The grammar here is a thousand times better then over at freeperville. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Well, we can try to make it better by even a larger margin...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. I do my best but even I forget that damn apostrophe sometimes. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #66
79. No, it isn't
Granted, the amount of reading I do there isn't enough for a true representation. But, from what I have read, they're the better grammarians.



Glass houses... :scared:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #79
81. Well to be honest I avoid such places most times. What I have seen is always filled with errors. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #66
106. Not "then"; "than" over at FR.
"Then" is used to show a linear progression through time--e.g., "We when to dinner, then we when to a movie."

"Than" is used to show comparison or contrast--e.g., "Democrats are smarter than Republicans."

But we do it out of love! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
69. NO SUCH WORD >>>>>>> alot <<<<<<<< NO SUCH WORD
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 09:08 PM by VOX
Don't wanna be a grammar nazi -- there's enough crap to deal with in this world. But "alot" -- and I see that a lot -- folks, there just isn't any such word as "alot." Ever.

Then there's "noone" (sic) for no one, but that's another post. Whew. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #69
83. So many people use it.. it makes it a word anyway. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #83
84. No.
Frequent usage makes it a spelling or grammar mistake commonly made by the ignorant -- a lesser error than "amnety," perhaps, but of the same family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #84
95. But you know what the word means though. Like "Ain't"


I ain't seen any use of ain't in a while so maybe someday alot of people will no longer use "alot".

:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #69
118. I do it
because it was my major in undergrad school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
73. THEN v. THAN! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
74. Itz not really itz problem.
:evilgrin:

I got yer dangling possessive rite here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
76. While we're at it, some folks here really should learn to spell 'amendment'
All errors look bad, but — well, we're sposta know that gummint stuff. :patriot:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
77. Neither are you're and your
and apostrophe is not used to convert a singular to a plural form. The plural of a book is books, not books' or book's.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheltiemama Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
82. You've warmed the cockles of my copy-editing heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
88. This Is My Biggest Grammatical Failing.
It can NEVER get this straight. At least when I mess up "you're" and "your" (which I do constantly), I usually realize it in time to go back and correct it. But I'm ALWAYS messing up "its" and "it's".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
89. Affect vs. Effect
A simpler explanation, maybe.

“Affect” is almost always a verb (as “modify” is a verb).
“Effect” is almost always a noun (as “modification” is a noun).

“The medication had no effect on the symptoms.”
“The medication did not affect the symptoms.”

“What effect did the loss have on the team?”
“How was the team affected by the loss?”

“The government's action had no effect on the trade imbalance.”
“The trade imbalance was not affected by the government's action.”


Rarely, “effect” is a verb (as “create” is a verb: “creation” is a noun.)
“Rheumatic fever can effect (create) changes in heart function.”
“The new manager effected (caused) some positive changes in the office.”


Very rarely, “affect” is a noun (as “appearance” is a noun).
“The sedative caused the patient to exhibit a flattened affect.”
(pronounced AFF-ect in this usage, most common in medical writing)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #89
101. or "affect" as in "emotion" as in, "what was his affect at that time?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. should be: "between you and me" and NOT 'between you and I"
this really bugs me

i hear it more and more, or some similar variant

these prepositions (for, between, etc...) take the objective case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. and "it is SHE" or "it is HE" NOT 'it is him' or 'it is her' arggghhhhhh
the verb 'to be' takes the nominative case, not the objective case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
96. Nobody has mentioned *my* pet peeve.
Second only to "it's" (can Americans really not spell a three-letter word in their own language?) is "They gave a gift to my wife and I". Argh!! I hear this mistake every single day, on the radio, on the TV, on the computer, everywhere.

Folks.

They gave a gift to my wife.
They gave a gift to me.
They gave a gift to my wife and me.

It's easy! You don't change "me" to "I" just because there is an "and" there.

Worse still is the double error of "It came as a total surprise to he and I". Please! "To he"? How can that be English? Think!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #96
111. exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
97. If we could just get a grammar checker
added to the spelling checker....

At least we have a spelling checker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #97
98. Dependence on spelling checkers is what causes most of the problems
iterated above.

I've always told people, "If you depend on spell-check, then you REALLY need a proofreader."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #98
100. grammar checker = proof reader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #97
108. The trouble is that English is an exceptional language.
And I don't mean exceptional in the "City on a Hill" sense. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #97
120. Microsoft Word used to have that.
But my computer with Word is in storage...(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
99. You're such a looser

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
110. "grizzly" versus "grisly".
It was a grizzly crime = a bear did it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
114. Oh get over it. People screw up. But for the grace of someone go I
and all...

If you can read it and understand it, shut up about it already.

Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #114
124. Sensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #124
126. No, not me. I'd call the idiots who get bent about punctuation, especially
when quite a few of the posts are typed in the heat of the moment are sensitve. Wouldn't you? Its, It's... I mean really. Would that my life were so perfect I'd have time to be bitching about that.

Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
115. "I could care less"
That one always gets me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #115
121. an attempt at irony,
I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
123. mine is its and its even when its it is. dont like to bother with the '. too much work. lol
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 08:51 PM by seabeyond
now what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC