|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:59 PM Original message |
And now a word from the Grammar Police: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. It don't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 05:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
47. This thread could also be titled "Why the foniks method doesn't work" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 11:56 PM Response to Reply #47 |
78. Apparently these shortened texting terms are making their way to papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #47 |
85. We ESOL teachers are also seeing the disappearance of the 3rd person singular in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. Glenn Beck made you write that, didn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. my favorites are the folks who think "lose" and" loose" are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. My pet peeve is the misuse of "their" & "they're." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
33. that, and your vs. you're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:48 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Yep, that's also an infuriating one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #33 |
94. Your vs. you're? Your kidding me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
107. They're, their, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
119. Their, they're and there. Yes, that makes me crazy too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Yeah, talk about lose cannons! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 12:43 AM Response to Reply #18 |
80. That's "canons". :D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:47 AM Response to Reply #80 |
86. Oh, yes, the Pachelbel Canon in D. Beautiful... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. I think that those two are used here incorrectly as a spoof on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Actually, they are not.I have seen this usage in some very well written |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 11:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
75. Putting quotes around "serious" tells me all I need to know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. A blog devoted to this subject:- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. Your last sentence is not grammatically correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Que? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. But that's two sentences. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainngirl (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
39. and if you want to get REALLY anal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MorningGlow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. Actually, no hyphen there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 06:49 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. You are SCARY! You sprung a new one on me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MorningGlow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 06:56 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainngirl (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:29 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. edited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:32 PM Response to Reply #49 |
104. Why does America hate the adverb? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prometheus Bound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:07 PM Response to Reply #104 |
112. I guess "Serious?" could be short for "Are you serious?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prometheus Bound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
113. I think 'you' is redundant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. People who care about getting things right are not police, nazis or anything else... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. Picky, picky. What next, complaining about having a word's letters in the proper order? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Before you sit back and put your feet up, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Don't mention marshall - martial either......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MorningGlow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 05:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
50. "A women" drives me NUTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
122. "affect -effect" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. There is no such word as 'alot'. If one says an item is 'very unique' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. Just because it's uniquer doesn't mean that it's the uniquest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:31 AM Response to Reply #29 |
87. I think you misspelled "uniquiest" but I don't want to seem overly critical . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichaelHarris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. F^%k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. Actually, the spelling horse threw a shoe, so ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichaelHarris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 10:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
70. As long as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. Martial, not marshall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Oooops! I didn't read far enough into the thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
62. "would of" is one of my many pet peeves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
12. "Kudos" is not the plural of a "Kudo" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. The poor apostrophe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. Then they should read the Acts of the Apostrophes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:34 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. How obstensively farcicle of you . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
16. My grammar never belonged to the police. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. Alternative grammar and spelling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. NOOOOO NOT THE GRAMMAR POLICE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zorahopkins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
93. I LOVE The Grammar Police! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. Should have, not should of........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
25. I have known writers who are often confused with that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CurtEastPoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
26. But isn't it the principal of it that matters? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
40. . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
28. ***BBBZZZZ*** - punctuation, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kadie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
35. I'd like to add: It's not "whinning", it's "whining" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
36. Proper use of grammar and correct spelling are signs that you are an elitist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
37. Your to series. Losen up you're tie or yul loose yur mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
38. I'm gonna possess your ass on my fist -in your face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Call Me Wesley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
42. Your' must be oligarhy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
43. Technically that's an ORTHOGRAPHICAL (spelling) mistake, not a grammar mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. I classify apostrophe abuse as grammar not spelling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chemisse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
45. I used to do some editing of press releases sent into the local paper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frebrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
46. Thank You! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
48. I notice some illiterate unrec'd you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DawgHouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
51. You're gonna love September 24, National Punctuation Day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
54. What no ode to my spell check??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
55. Thank you, boss ddeclue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
56. Your First Two Sentences Are Missing Periods. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
57. 90% of the time, LEAVE THE APOSTROPHE OUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrs. Overall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
59. My pet peeve is misuse of the conditional-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
60. Its confusing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
61. Cop Talk - My partner and myself......nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
63. Your write. People our always doing that. Their sew stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
64. If we're correcting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yawnmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:43 PM Response to Reply #64 |
109. "Its X" is the possessive for it, as in "The X belonging to it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
65. "would of" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 10:21 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. The verb affect leaves an effect. It happens first and a comes before e. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #71 |
90. Why, thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. por nada nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:37 PM Response to Reply #71 |
116. Effect can, on occasion, be used as a verb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #116 |
125. you are correct. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. Affect vs effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #72 |
91. I also read somewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #65 |
105. "Yeah, yeah. Could of, would of, should of!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:39 PM Response to Reply #105 |
117. I think this results from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-18-09 03:17 PM Response to Reply #117 |
127. I think you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
66. IMHO The grammar here is a thousand times better then over at freeperville. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 08:14 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Well, we can try to make it better by even a larger margin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 08:59 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. I do my best but even I forget that damn apostrophe sometimes. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 11:56 PM Response to Reply #66 |
79. No, it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 12:44 AM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Well to be honest I avoid such places most times. What I have seen is always filled with errors. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:37 PM Response to Reply #66 |
106. Not "then"; "than" over at FR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
69. NO SUCH WORD >>>>>>> alot <<<<<<<< NO SUCH WORD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 12:47 AM Response to Reply #69 |
83. So many people use it.. it makes it a word anyway. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:40 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 07:46 PM Response to Reply #84 |
95. But you know what the word means though. Like "Ain't" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:41 PM Response to Reply #69 |
118. I do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WorseBeforeBetter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
73. THEN v. THAN! (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
74. Itz not really itz problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
76. While we're at it, some folks here really should learn to spell 'amendment' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
77. Neither are you're and your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheltiemama (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
82. You've warmed the cockles of my copy-editing heart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
88. This Is My Biggest Grammatical Failing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
89. Affect vs. Effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:26 PM Response to Reply #89 |
101. or "affect" as in "emotion" as in, "what was his affect at that time?" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. should be: "between you and me" and NOT 'between you and I" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:29 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. and "it is SHE" or "it is HE" NOT 'it is him' or 'it is her' arggghhhhhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
96. Nobody has mentioned *my* pet peeve. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #96 |
111. exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ManiacJoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
97. If we could just get a grammar checker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:55 AM Response to Reply #97 |
98. Dependence on spelling checkers is what causes most of the problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ManiacJoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 05:45 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. grammar checker = proof reader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #97 |
108. The trouble is that English is an exceptional language. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:44 PM Response to Reply #97 |
120. Microsoft Word used to have that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
99. You're such a looser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
110. "grizzly" versus "grisly". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
114. Oh get over it. People screw up. But for the grace of someone go I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:03 PM Response to Reply #114 |
124. Sensitive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 10:28 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. No, not me. I'd call the idiots who get bent about punctuation, especially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
115. "I could care less" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:46 PM Response to Reply #115 |
121. an attempt at irony, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
123. mine is its and its even when its it is. dont like to bother with the '. too much work. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC