|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
PearliePoo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:37 PM Original message |
MSNBC is reporting House will introduce resolution of disapproval within the hour |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine-ah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. I missed something here....disapproval of what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Joe Wilson's childish compulsive outburst maybe? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine-ah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. thats what I was thinking but not sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Wilson -- You lie! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Disapproval of Wilson for his breach of House decorum with his outburst. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PearliePoo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Yes. It will be interesting to see who introduces it. Rep.Clyburn perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Makes me happy, although I don't know what a Resolution of Disapproval is -- do you? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. it precedes double secret probation ? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. They should let his constituents vote -- they're his bosses, they should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. They do get to vote - Nov. 2010. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Yes, I understand that - I meant a special vote to remove him from office if they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. I know that's what you meant - I was trying to be funny - and failed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Oh, I'm sorry! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. No prob! On a serious note though, I don't think federal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I'm sure you're right -- so I'll retract my original statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. sure, but if this isnt dealt with inside the chamber... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. I'm not sure that they would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PearliePoo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. No...not really because I've never seen it done before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I'm still apoplectic that Larry Craig essentially skated through his debacle even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PearliePoo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. You're welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Very well said! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crazyjoe (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm sorry, this is stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
metapunditedgy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Wilson is calling plenty of attention to himself. He's forcing the grown-ups to weigh in.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. Since he refused to apologize on the floor of the House, drag the issue out and embarrass him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
15. What's the penalty? A group frown from his colleagues? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
16. And here's Roger Simon of Politico, right on cue to call it dumb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
22. Woot!nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
23. resolution of disapproval? what the hell is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. a slap on the wrist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nilram (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
29. Those in favor say, "tsk tsk!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. What is happening ~ please tell us nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Dup, sorry nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC