Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lothario Wolfowitz Has A Wife

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 11:57 AM
Original message
Lothario Wolfowitz Has A Wife
Amid all the talk of him promoting his girlfriend, nowhere do I see mentioned that he has a wife, (though they are now separated), and three kids. What the heck is up with that? Or the fact that his main squeeze (ick) may have influenced his push for war.

“Wolfowitz met anthropologist Clare Selgin Wolfowitz while they were both studying at Cornell University in the mid-60s. They married in 1968 and had three children. They separated in 2001.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wolfowitz#Personal_li...

“Influential members of staff at the international organisation have complained to its board that Paul Wolfowitz, a married father of three, is so besotted with Oxford-educated Shaha Riza he cannot be impartial.

Extraordinarily, they claim she played a key role in pushing the 61-year-old Pentagon official into the Iraq War. And the row comes amid claims that Wolfowitz's wife Clare once warned George Bush of the threat to national security any infidelity by her husband could cause.”

http://www.canofun.com/cof/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=2...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm trying to imagine a woman who's sexually aroused by comb licking
My imagination seems to have reached its limit before I can envision this particular fetish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right, she's got to be a plant
There is no way that horrible, slovenly man could possibly attract anything female on his own merits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You don't have to imagine any more. Here she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Oh my God! She looks like a female version of him!
I mean, she doesn't look bad (and it's not exactly a flattering shot), but I can see a real physical resemblence there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. She reminds me of Jeanne Kirkpatrick, whom I'd see at Safeway shopping. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Must have cut down on you grocery bills;
that's a sure appetite-killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. I had to help her with her Safeway card once. To get the line moving. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. Doesn't surprise me. Several years back she was incoherent on
a TV interview. It was sad. So I figured that by the time she died last year she had been pretty out of it for a few years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. And Wolfowitz looks like a drunk Bob Denver mugshot
Not that Bob Denver drank, he was a pot smoker, but every time I see Wolfowitz I think of Gilligan on a three day bender.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Maybe it was his toes sticking out of the holes in his socks.
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 01:08 PM by WritersBlock


Wish I could find the pic of that. Still gives me heartburn in the middle of the night just thinking about it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Here you go! From this thread
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 01:12 PM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I knew I could count on a kind DUer to find it! Thanks!


Of course, now I'm off my feed again.... maybe I should post this pic on my refrigerator door to help with my weight-loss program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. It's the comb licking that makes me want to barf. Now if they had a photo of him
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 01:26 PM by OmmmSweetOmmm
biting off his toe nails.... ooops, sorry! Not a great visual either!

PS... I bet he eats his buggers too! (I'm so bad)! Someone beat me to that! See post #18, he's halfway there!

:rofl:

PS..your welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coco77 Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
42. When I first saw the picture of her and him last night...
my first thought when to his holey socks and I thought about how much funk must have been generating where ever they were having sex :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. They're Said To Have Made Out At A Party, In Front Of People
even ickier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Or nose-picking. . .
Look carefully at the top story on the Friday edition of BBC World News, carried on almost 400 PBS stations, and you'll see what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. I bet she makes goober-and-dirty-sock soup for dinner! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. oh the power of lust


lust

the study of lust

a least studied subject?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. She certainly isn't lusting after him....
so what's her agenda? That's what I'm interested in finding out. What are her connections and to whom does she pledge her allegiance? I'd be extremely surprised if it was the United States. Extremely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. So we, as a nation, were pushed into this insanity
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 12:12 PM by marylanddem
to satiate Wolfowitz's girlfriend's bloodlust?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Elizabeth CHENEY was also a 'colleague' of Wolfowitz's partner Shaha Ali Riza"
This is just part of a criminal conspiracy with many overarching components. It includes treason.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x548152#651509
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Excellent Info, Thanks
The more we know about these people the better for us. As far as Liz Cheney goes, I think I read something this week about her connection to Wurmser, the guy who ran the extra special intelligence office for Cheney and the neos, as well as his (along with his dreadful wife) trying to push us into war with Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Share it and add to the research, Me.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. A Small 'Dossier'
Tons more availabel with a Liz Cheney + Wurmser google.

“During the past 15 months, Elizabeth Cheney has met with and bolstered a gaggle of Syrian exiles, often in tandem with John Hannah and David Wurmser, top officials in the Office of the Vice President (OVP); has pressed hard for money to accelerate the administration’s ever more overt campaign for forced regime change in both Damascus and Teheran; and has overseen an increasingly discredited push for American-inspired democratic reform from Morocco to Iran. With the unspoken support of her father, Cheney has kept a hawk’s eye on Iraq policy within the department, intimidating opponents of the neoconservative axis within the administration. And, less visibly, according to former officials who’ve worked with her, she has made her influence felt in choosing officials, selecting (or blocking) the appointment of ambassadors and other foreign service officers, and weighing in on other bureaucratic battles at the department.

Now, according to the Financial Times of London, Cheney is coordinating the work of a new entity called the Iran-Syria Operations Group. The unit was established “to plot a more aggressive democracy promotion strategy for those two ‘rogue’ states,” reported the Times. In February, the State Department announced that Cheney would oversee a $5 million program to “accelerate the work of reformers in Syria,” providing grants of up to $1 million each to Syrian dissidents. And in the current fiscal year, she will oversee a similar, $7 million regime-change grant program for Iran, though funding for that effort is expected to grow to at least $85 million soon, to include both a propaganda program and support to Iranian opposition groups.” Cont…

http://dysbushtopia.blogspot.com/2006/06/liz-cheney-dads-enforcer.html

“Not everyone, however, was pleased with Cheney's work. Larry Wilkerson, who served as Powell's assistant at State, told the American Prospect 's Robert Dreyfuss (June 2006) that she clashed with ambassadors while visiting the Middle East. Recounted Wilkerson: “Liz Cheney comes out to this country, and she tells the ambassador—and she doesn't outrank him—she tells the ambassador, ‘You're not going in the meeting with me.' And he says, ‘I'm sorry, I'm going in the meeting with you. You're not going into a meeting with the head of State without me.' And she says, ‘Nope—would you like a telephone call?'”

Her work after returning to the State Department fueled speculation that she had become a key figure behind administration plans to intervene in Iran and possibly in Syria. Dreyfuss reported: “During the past 15 months, Elizabeth Cheney has met with and bolstered a gaggle of Syrian exiles, often in tandem with John Hannah and David Wurmser, top officials in the Office of the Vice President; has pressed hard for money to accelerate the administration's ever-more overt campaign for forced regime change in both Damascus and Tehran; and has overseen an increasingly discredited push for American-inspired democratic reform from Morocco to Iran. With the unspoken support of her father, Cheney has kept a hawk's eye on Iraq policy within the department, intimidating opponents of the neoconservative axis within the administration. And, less visibly, according to former officials who've worked with her, she has made her influence felt in choosing officials, selecting (or blocking) the appointment of ambassadors and other foreign service officers, and weighing in on other bureaucratic battles at the department.”

Cheney was also connected with the work of two newly created offices in the State Department that revived concerns in early 2006 about the Bush administration's plans for the Middle East. On April 22, 2006, the Financial Times reported on the creation of an “Iran-Syria Operations Group” (ISOG) that purportedly reported to Cheney. Adam Ereli, a State Department spokesman, denied the group existed. However, other unnamed sources, including U.S. government officials and a European diplomat, assured the Financial Times that the group had in fact been established. These sources said that the group is an interagency effort that “is supposed to coordinate with the Pentagon and other departments,” and that it is headed by “David Denehy, a special adviser who served in the coalition government in Iraq, and Alberto Fernandez, a public diplomacy official.”

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/3376

“Like Hannah, who came to the OVP from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Wurmser traipsed a roundabout path to Cheney’s staff: He worked with Hannah at WINEP in the 1990s, and then went to AEI, where he directed Middle East affairs, to the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans, to John Bolton’s arms control shop at the State Department, and then to the OVP. Even among ardent supporters of Israel, Wurmser -- and his wife, Meyrav, who runs the Hudson Institute’s Middle East program -- is considered an extremist. In 1996, the Wurmsers, Perle, and Feith co-authored the famous “Clean Break” paper for then–Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, which called for radical measures to redraw the map of the entire Middle East (Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Palestine) to benefit Israel. Later, in a series of papers and a book, Wurmser argued that toppling Saddam was likely to lead directly to civil war and the breakup of Iraq, but he supported the policy anyway: “The residual unity of is an illusion projected by the extreme repression of the state.” After Saddam, Iraq will “be ripped apart by the politics of warlords, tribes, clans, sects, and key families,” he wrote. “Underneath facades of unity enforced by state repression, politics is defined primarily by tribalism, sectarianism, and gang/clan-like competition.” Yet Wurmser explicitly urged the United States and Israel to “expedite” such a collapse. “The issue here is whether the West and Israel can construct a strategy for limiting and expediting the chaotic collapse that will ensue in order to move on to the task of creating a better circumstance.” Later, with former cia director James Woolsey and others, Wurmser proposed restoring the Jordan-based Hashemite monarchy in Iraq. While Wurmser’s OVP allies may share his neoconservative fantasies of the willy-nilly reorganization of the Middle East, few experts do. “I’ve known him for years, and I consider him to be a naive simpleton,” says a former U.S. ambassador. Adds Wilkerson, “A lot of these guys, including Wurmser, I looked at as card-carrying members of the Likud party, as I did with Feith. You wouldn’t open their wallet and find a card, but I often wondered if their primary allegiance was to their own country or to Israel. That was the thing that troubled me, because there was so much that they said and did that looked like it was more reflective of Israel’s interest than our own.”

Today Wurmser, Hannah, Liz Cheney, and her father are pushing hard for confrontations with both Iran and Syria. Liz Cheney, who exercises enormous power inside the State Department, has secured millions of dollars to support opposition elements in both countries, and she has met with Syria’s version of Ahmad Chalabi, a discredited businessman from Virginia named Farid al-Ghadry. Hannah sat in on the meeting with Ghadry, which was arranged through Meyrav Wurmser, a friend of the would-be Syrian leader. Hannah and Wurmser’s boss, the vice president, talks freely about the need for a military showdown with Iran to destroy its alleged nuclear program. The true measure of how powerful the vice president’s office remains today is whether the United States chooses to confront Iran and Syria or to seek diplomatic solutions. For the moment, at least, the war party led by Dick Cheney remains in ascendancy.”

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=11423




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Here's a good collaborative investigation parent thread to spend time with this weekend Me.
Post 1 has two other investigatory links to work off of.

Keep at it Me-share it, and I encourage others to dig right in because there is going to be accountability for what these criminals have done to all of US.

"A DU collaborative investigation; National Energy Policy Development Group/NEPDG"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x440721

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. You've Been Archived Bob
You may need to start up another
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. I'm beginning to understand...
just what a herculean task it's going to be cleaning up after this administration. They've made everything within the government's reach political, from A to Z. Their tentacles stretch everywhere. There is no aspect of our government that hasn't been handed over to "loyal Bushies" to defile and dismantle. :wow: I knew it was bad but I had NO IDEA it was THIS bad! :wow: Good grief. The next administration is going to have to clean house from top to bottom. The rabid-right has operatives within every crevice of our government just waiting to disrupt and continue their agenda no matter who's in the Oval Office.

Holy shit. I'm more depressed than I've ever been. These people are evil......pure fucking evil. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. One way to get out of a funk (and I've been there) is to do some investigation
and share that with others Clinton Tyree. These folks are truly evil and entrenched from our local school boards and other offices all the way to the WH-but the good news is that you and I and others (we, the people) are taking names and connecting them.

These people are accountable for what they've done. Their greatest fear is the light of the truth shining on them.

If nothing else keep kicking these threads and share them with your friends.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Very good.
The small world becomes smaller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Ain't That The Truth
Almost pinched if you ask me and all of it leads back to 2 big giant heads, Cheney and Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. It also goes back
to the "Mr. X" mentioned in James Bamford's "A Pretext for War" on page 405 of the 2nd edition's new afterword.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. More
Please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. From the not-covered spy case:
Iran: The Next War
By James Bamford
Rolling Stone

Monday 24 July 2006

Even before the bombs fell on Baghdad, a group of senior Pentagon officials were plotting to invade another country. Their covert campaign once again relied on false intelligence and shady allies. But this time, the target was Iran.

How did the Bush administration sell the Iraq war? Is war with Iran unavoidable?

...

IV. On the Trail of Mr. X

Such covert efforts by Feith's team in the Pentagon started to have the desired effect. In November 2003, Rumsfeld approved a plan known as CONPLAN 8022-02, which for the first time established a pre-emptive-strike capability against Iran. That was followed in 2004 by a top-secret "Interim Global Strike Alert Order" that put the military on a state of readiness to launch an airborne and missile attack against Iran, should Bush issue the command. "We're now at the point where we are essentially on alert," said Lt. Gen. Bruce Carlson, commander of the 8th Air Force. "We have the capacity to plan and execute global strikes in half a day or less."

But as the Pentagon moved the country closer to war with Iran, the FBI was expanding its investigation of AIPAC and its role in the plot. David Szady, then the bureau's top spy-catcher, had become convinced that at least one American citizen working inside the U.S. government was spying for Israel. "It's no longer just our traditional adversaries who want to steal our secrets, but sometimes even our allies," Szady declared. "The threat is incredibly serious." To locate the spy sometimes referred to as Mr. X, agents working for Szady began focusing on a small group of neoconservatives in the Pentagon - including Feith, Ledeen and Rhode.

The FBI also had its sights on Larry Franklin, who continued to hold clandestine meetings with Rosen at AIPAC. Apparently nervous that the FBI might be on to them, the two men started taking precautions. On March 10th, 2003, barely a week before the invasion of Iraq, Rosen met Franklin in Washington's cavernous Union Station. The pair met at one restaurant, then they hustled to another, and finally they ended up in a third - this one totally empty. As an added precaution, Franklin also began sending faxes to Rosen's home instead of to his AIPAC offices.

A few days later, Rosen and Weissman passed on to Israeli-embassy officials details about the draft of the top-secret presidential directive on Iran, saying they had received the document from a "friend of ours in the Pentagon." They also relayed to the Israelis details about internal Bush-administration discussions on Iran. Then, two days before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Rosen leaked the information to the press with the comment "I'm not supposed to know this." The Washington Post eventually published the story under the headline "Pressure Builds for President to Declare Strategy on Iran," crediting the classified information to "well-placed sources." The story mentioned Ledeen, who helped found the Coalition for Democracy in Iran, a pressure group dedicated to the overthrow of the Iranian government, but gave no indication that the leak had come from someone with a definite agenda for planting the information.

http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/62/21409

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Marvelous Piece
I'd forgotten about Mr.X. God how treacherous all this is, incestuous and dangerous.

"It was a role that AIPAC was eager to play. Rosen, recognizing that Franklin could serve as a useful spy, immediately began plotting ways to plant him in the White House - specifically in the National Security Council, the epicenter of intelligence and national-security policy. By working there, Rosen told Franklin a few days later, he would be "by the elbow of the president."

Knowing that such a maneuver was well within AIPAC's capabilities, Franklin asked Rosen to "put in a good word" for him. Rosen agreed. "I'll do what I can," he said, adding that the breakfast meeting had been a real "eye-opener."

Working together, the two men hoped to sell the United States on yet another bloody war. A few miles away, digital recorders at the FBI's Language Services Section captured every word."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. Incredible....
the hypocrisy and cronyism of this bunch of Bush miscreants knows no bounds. These have to be the most unethical, in-your-face, power hounds on the planet. :wow:

Unfreakingbelievable! :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. if they are separated why would there be any mention?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The reason they separated was his constant public affairs - he has no zipper n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. THIS man has no zipper?
mmmm, tasty

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. arggggh!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
52. No zipper would tend to obstruct sex. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Also, Wife On The Side, Public Affairs
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 12:38 PM by Me.
is not strictly in accordance with the family values handbook :rofl:

In addition, is this the image the president of the world bank should be presenting to the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. because the mistress is on the public payroll
Not just earning more than her worth, but also getting plummy assignments as apparent compensation for her sexual attention to Wolfo. It's important for the public to know that she is the mistress of a married man and father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. He probably told her it would only costs 2 cents to remodel the house!
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 01:46 PM by Joanne98
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh come now. What woman wouldn't want a piece of him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Someone with an agenda.....
someone who is willing to forsake her body and mind for her own agenda, or the agenda of another government? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Interesting.
His infidelity might be a foreign affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. Please! It was shocking enough he had a GF! Don't take me there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
35. Remember when the cons were getting
testy over any influence Hillary might have had on Bill? 'We elected him not her'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
37. She's an anthropologist? Noooo!
Most of us are smarter than that, I promise. ;)

(And out of respect for Monty Python's Terry Jones and Michael Palin, I won't say anything regarding the Oxford education of the girlfriend.) :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
48. another kick the WB meeting is in a few hours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
50. Wolfie the stud????
:puke: IMHO, the girlfriend was w-a-a-a-a-a-y underpaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
51. I despise him but he's allowed to have a lover.
That fact that he has a girlfriend and is separated from his wife isn't the problem. The problem is that he engaged in a corrupt act of nepotism, lied about it, and at the same time was busy denying development loans to nations because of perceived official corruption.

In other words Wolfowitz is a lying fucking hypocrite, only the fucking part is irrelevant. Plus he spits on his comb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. I Think The Point Of The Lover Business Is The Hypocrisy Of The Matter
It's not his first and may not be the last. The hypocrisy of his behavior is representative of the character of the man. So much so that his wife felt the need to point out to * that her husband might be a security risk. Also, not to be overlooked is the notion that the girlfriend might have been a major influence in pushing him to make a case for a war with Iraq. As to the sex being irrelevant, if she is using him to achieve her means then it becomes a version of a honeypot scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. The hypocrisy is the nepotism not the lover.
If there was no act of nepotism what exactly is hypocritical? Wolfowitz is not demanding marital fidelity for WB loans, he is demanding no corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
53. Is impeachment still off the table? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC