Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kansas Bans Picketing of Funerals to Protest Homosexuals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:38 PM
Original message
Kansas Bans Picketing of Funerals to Protest Homosexuals
TOPEKA, Kansas — The governor of Kansas signed a law Thursday barring protesters from funerals in an attempt to curtail a fundamentalist church that pickets military funerals, claiming the deaths are God's punishment for homosexuality.

However, the legislation has the legal novelty of not taking effect until the Kansas Supreme Court or a federal court upholds it as constitutional.

Legislators added that provision to lessen concerns that the Rev. Fred Phelps and his followers would file a legal challenge, win and collect attorney fees from the state.

"It's disgraceful for anyone to try and disrupt a funeral," Gov. Kathleen Sebelius said during a Statehouse ceremony. "It is unfortunate this reprehensible practice has been exported to other states."

The members of Westboro Baptist Church, a small fundamentalist congregation in Topeka, picket burials of U.S. troops killed in combat. They say those deaths are God's punishment for a nation that harbors homosexuals, and maintain that their protests are a form of religious expression protected by the U.S. Constitution.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265622,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. But the GOP is on record for hating gays
Every anti gay organization is welcomed and promoted by the GOP, from CWA to AFA to FRC.

The GOP has ben responsible for the entire hate gays movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. What does the GOP have to do with it?
Edited on Fri Apr-13-07 11:00 PM by Mabus
:shrug: The governor of our fair state is a Democrat. We kicked out a five-time GOP incumbent and elected a Dem to his seat in Congress. We kicked out a fundamentalist AG and replaced him with a Dem. We also replaced a number of Republicans in the state legislature and on the local level last year.

In the meantime the Kansas GOP is falling apart. They have lost most of their base around here. There have been high-profile defections and some of the Republican candidates who lost their primaries in August campaigned for the Democratic candidate in the general election because they thought their party's choosen candidate was a wacko.

and on edit: there are still a number of the crazier GOP'ers in the state legislature but overall they're overall numbers have decreased. The trend is really towards the middle with an emphasis on the center. There was a bloody battle a couple of years ago over education funding, then there's been the whole stupidity of the Kansas state school board that has gotten more sensible Republicans out to vote against the wackos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Good for the Dems. But Phelps was encouraged by the GOP
For the last six years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. What does that have to do with the opening post?
Phelps may get some support from Republicans somewhere but most of the local GOP try to steer clear of him. GOP candidates return donations from the Phelps except for the ones that are fundamentalist RW idiots. A lot of local Republicans don't want to have anything to do with him either. In fact, this is probably the most publicity the Phelps' have gotten in our state since Michael Moore featured them on his show years ago. We ignore them. They don't get TV time, no one interviews them and that's why they go elsewhere. If you watch the coverage you see in the media you'll notice that there are very few if any stories about them emanating from Kansas.

One of the reasons we Dems don't like to talk about him is because the Phelps clan were registered Democrats for years. Before Fred went homophobic he used to hold fundraisers for the Democratic party. He was a KS Dem delegate to the national convention at least once. There are pictures on the internet showing Fred hosting a fundraiser for the Gores and our Democratic Gov. Joan Finney. These pictures surfaced back in 2000 thanks to the Log Cabin Republicans. What they forgot to mention was that one of the Phelps Phamily's first anti-gay protests was at the funeral of Al Gore Sr. because of their opposition to Clinton/Gore's support for gay rights.

The entire Westboro congregation picketed a 1997 inaugural ball<37>, denouncing Gore as a "famous fag pimp."<38> In 1998, Westboro picketed the funeral of Gore's father, screaming vulgarities at Gore and telling him, "your dad's in Hell."<38>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps#Opposition_to_Al_Gore_and_Bill_Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Where did you get that idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have witnessed one of their . . .
vile "protests". Little kids holding hate signs. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The GOP emboldened the hate gays movement
Don't forget that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. yes.
It's the old Nazi fear playbook.

And it works all too well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fred Phelps is a shithead. But without new laws, couldn't they just restrict any protests to a
"free speech zone" in a parking lot several miles away? That's what they've been doing with the Preznit for years, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, why don't they use the GOP to do so
The GOP emboldened this hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm just saying. It's not like people have the free right to protest anywhere they want as it is. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It's about gays and the GOP spread their hatred
and silent OK to discriminate and humiliate. Westboro bought into the GOP movement against gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. You and I are both making two extremely valid points.
But those two points don't have much to do with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pro2nd Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Unnecessary law
Why waste the money on passing and enforcing a new law? A good beat-down by the fallen soldier's platoon would be sufficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That doesn't change the GOP fueled this hatred of Gays n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pro2nd Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Although the GOP record on gay issues isn't exactly stellar,
I haven't heard anybody on the right taking the side of these clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The right enabled these clowns n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pro2nd Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Not to defend Hannity,
because I think he's a whiny little bitch, but he's the one who's slammed these inbred assholes the hardest. I'm no right-winger by any means, but I'd like to see evidence that anyone in a position of power or influence on the right has supported these nutjobs in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. The fallen soldier's platoon isn't around ...
They're still in the middle east, with their tours extended.

Plus, I think these so-called "christians" would love to get beat up, recorded on film, so they can sue. And I'd bet the ACLU would jump to their aid, defending their first amendment rights, in a massive display of irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pro2nd Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Any cop worth his salt
would say "hey, we only had vague descriptions of the suspects. They were 18-30 years of age with military-type haircuts. That could be anybody. Case closed, no leads." That's what I'd do anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flying_monkeys Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Color me stupid, but how would that work?
I mean, how does it get to the Courts to determine its constitutionality unless it is applied against someone who then challenges it? If it doesn't go into effect until it is upheld, but it won't get into the court works until it gets used, but it won't get used unless it is valid - - what am I missing here? How does it get to the point of being used and challenged?


Please connect the dots for me here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. There is similiar legislation in other states that is working its way through the system
For the most part, the Phelps Phamily doesn't do anything in Kansas because they don't get attention from the local media for it. I saw them at the opening ceremonies of the Dole Center a few years ago and besides their annual protest at the law school graduation ceremony I don't see much of them around here.

In other words, the legislation is symbolic because the Phelps family is too busy traveling around the country to hold protests here. As strange as it sounds, this really does work out. For example, we get to donate money for the legal expenses of the people who have accidently almost run over the Phelps family (it's been know to happen around these parts }( when the family shows up at the wrong funeral) instead of having our tax dollars spent trying to fight yet another lawsuit that the Phelps will file (you do know the are a family of lawyers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, I applaud the spirit of this so-called 'legislation', but it makes no sense.
If it's contingent on some nebulous future 'validation' by the courts, it's not a law at all. What kind of mealy-mouthed crap is this? It makes absolutely no legal sense at all. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. She wants to make sure it sticks
We have been battling Phelps here in Kansas for YEARS. Our governor just wants to make sure this law does the trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. K and R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. Well, doncha gotta pertect yerself from homos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC