Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To free us from the insurers, we need an Emancipation Proclamation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 05:05 PM
Original message
To free us from the insurers, we need an Emancipation Proclamation
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 05:50 PM by truedelphi
We do not need the convoluted bill that Max Baucus will surely now get away with, as the masterful cheerleader, President Obama, has glibly revved up the troops into accepting the fact that NOW IS THE TIME FOR HEALTH CARE REFORM.

Well, the only reform that would be true reform is this one

Universal Single Payer Health Care



If Lincoln could free the slaves with one proclamation, why cannot Obama do this?

"As of January 1st, 2010, every legitimate Citizen of the United States will be insured under MediCare for all. All that is necessary is providing your name, address and Social Security number."

As far as paying for the program, enter the cost of the program on the same line of the Federal Budget where Congess gets their health plans paid for.

Lincoln's Proclamation was one of the few times when a mandated reform actually was effective. The slaves were freed.

However, I cannot think of one instance of government reform after 1970 that was any type of success. Lincoln's Proclamation was not the utter failure that the Tax Reform of 1984 was, nor the utter failure of the Welfare Reform Act of the mid-nineties, nor the utter failure of the Banking Reform Act of 1999, nor the failure of "No Child Left Behind."





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. But Obama wants to stay and deal with them. They will only grow bigger after
the final bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. This "Plan" Represents A CONSUMER Funded BAILOUT OF BIG INSURANCE... Nothing More And Nothing Less!
I knew that the Koolaide was "sour" three years ago... It's a shame so many Listen But DO NOT HEAR! When listening to a GREAT Speech... The "contents" of which are questionable at best and deplorable at the worst!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That is exactly the way I see it as well.
Hillary actually mentioned some of this during her primary campaign and it was one of a list of reasons that I gave up on her completely.

We started with the problem of some Americans being unable to afford health care and the discussion morphed into ways simplify life for some very bad corporations.

How fucking stupid is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riverman Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Enter it on the same line that cuts the Pentagon Budget in half to
help pay for it. Not one red cent of deficit spending for War, bailouts for bank, insurance and auto corporations! Now that would be change that I could believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Would be fantastic!
I'm no legal scholar and can't say whether it's that simple but we'd benefit mightily from it.

If we stopped some of our pointless military adventurism we could certainly pay for it.

The failures you mention in your last paragraph are probably only failures from the perspective of the civic-minded. Those acts probably achieved exactly what they set out to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hear, hear!
Even Ted Kennedy's 2007 "Medicare for All" bill, which phases in coverage of all Americans over three years would be better than the turd the Administration is trying to sell us at the moment.

Of course, an immediate switch to single-payer would be best for the majority of us, and for all of us in the long run.

Here's hoping that someone in the White House is listening.

:toast:

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. knr - that is too simple, plus "insurance companies provide a legitimate service..."
:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC