Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Domestic Spying Revelations Make Impeachment Now Imperative

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:40 PM
Original message
Domestic Spying Revelations Make Impeachment Now Imperative
Domestic Spying Revelations Make Impeachment Now Imperative

By Paul Craig Roberts

While serving as President Bush’s White House lawyer, Alberto Gonzales advised Bush that the president’s war time powers permitted Bush to ignore the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and to use the National Security Agency (NSA) to spy on US citizens without obtaining warrants from the FISA court as required by law. Under an order signed by Bush in 2002, NSA illegally spied on Americans without warrants.

By spying on Americans without obtaining warrants, Bush committed felonies under FISA. Moreover, there is strong, indeed overwhelming, evidence that justice was obstructed when Bush and Gonzales blocked a 2006 Justice Department investigation into whether Gonzales acted properly as Attorney General in approving and overseeing the Bush administration’s program of spying on US citizens.

Also at issue is whether Gonzales acted properly in advising Bush to kill an investigation of Gonzales’ professional actions with regard to the NSA spy program.

We are faced with the almost certain fact that the two highest law enforcement officials of the United States are criminals.

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/070318_police.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. They did commit felonies and they should be prosecuted....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Confirms what we basically knew
And Bush will just continue to dare Congress to do something. I am not betting that they will. Makes me think of that Colbert bit where he listed some of the major scandals of Bushco and then called Congress a bunch of pussies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. The world wants us to impeach BushCo. ...we have to do it. ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The Constitution demands that we impeach them....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Americans have never experienced an administration so replete with crimes as the Bush Regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes indeed


:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I just checked out this link. can you tell me a bit (in a nutshell)
about Solari, and why you have quoted from that site? I didn't have time to read the entire article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. one reason
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 07:37 AM by seemslikeadream
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041101130426916

Monday, November 1 2004

"The Haunting of the White House"


(Editor's Note: We are pleased on this evening of Nov. 1st to 2nd, known in Mexico as "The Day of the Dead," to publish the following exclusive: a Republican-meets-Democrat, one-two punch editorial by Cynthia McKinney and Catherine Austin Fitts, on "The Haunting of the White House." An earlier version of the piece was written in response to a request from editors of The New York Times. So far the Times has declined to publish, but other print publications are still considering it. Meanwhile, you can feel free to forward it to the nine winds on the Web, with our thanks. - 911Truth.org Staff)

Day of the Dead:
The Haunting of the White House

By Cynthia McKinney and Catherine Austin Fitts

November 1, 2004

Something is rising from the ashes of September 11: the spectre of questions that will haunt our country until answered.

Months after the release of the official 9/11 Commission Report - even as Congress moves to implement its proposals for a radical centralization of security forces - growing numbers of Americans are doubting their own government's account of what really happened on September 11, and how.

From the first, the Bush Administration resisted investigation and disclosure. Families of September 11 victims were forced to lobby the administration and Congress for a full and independent inquiry. They fought for 14 months, blocked every step of the way by the White House.

The political games reached such a point that the survivors of the worst attack ever on American soil were forced to hold a candlelight vigil in front of the White House. A vigil for the truth.

The White House finally assented in December 2002 to the establishment of an independent commission, under former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean. Still, the administration pushed for a hand-picked panel, with a narrow focus on intelligence failures and recommendations.

The families demanded a full investigation, posing nearly 400 questions to the Kean Commission. The commissioners said they welcomed these queries. But their final report ignored most of the unanswered questions. Still posted on the website of the September 11 Family Steering Committee, these questions are a stark reminder of the Kean Commission's failures.

Now these same questions have been submitted to the New York Attorney General. Last week, the New York City office of Eliot Spitzer received a citizens' complaint to open a legal inquiry into crimes still unsolved, more than three years later.

So begins the haunting of the White House.

Driven by survivor families, independent researchers, journalists, and a growing number of ordinary citizens, an emergent "9/11 truth movement" has organized several public inquiries into the events of September 11 during the past year. As co-chairs of the first 9/11 Citizens' Commission, held in New York City in September, we were entrusted with answering questions the Kean Commission ignored.

What did we hear? We heard evidence of specific advance warnings about the 9/11 attacks from overseas. We heard about the spiking of FBI terrorism investigations and the lack of response during the attacks by high officials, including George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and the acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Richard Myers.

We heard about air toxicity at Ground Zero still afflicting firefighters, first responders, and New York residents - and how, in the days after September 11, the White House intervened to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from issuing a strong warning that the air in Lower Manhattan was unsafe to breathe.

We also learned that, although there was a stunning abandonment of standard procedure for hijackings and air defense on September 11, the 9/11 Commission Report fails to issue a call for official accountability.

As Kean Commission members travel the country to promote the findings of their report, we know many people are standing up to ask them tough questions about these and many other open issues. But ordinary people lack the subpeona powers necessary for a full discovery of the facts. Citizens' investigations can only go so far.

Some of those who testified before us in New York therefore explored the case for a grand-jury investigation. Possible charges included criminal negligence, failure to perform official duties, criminal facilitation, liability for accessorial conduct, conspiracy and obstruction of justice by high-ranking U.S. government officials.

These charges, now raised in the petition to the New York State Attorney General, may sound extreme. But they reflect a growing concern within the public. A Zogby International poll of New York City residents last August showed that 49 percent believe some high officials knew about the attacks in advance and "consciously failed" to take preventive action. 41 percent of state residents overall shared that view.

A full 66 percent of New York City residents in the survey agreed the case of 9/11 should be reopened by Congress - or by Eliot Spitzer. A Congressional inquiry that respects the pressing nature of these questions is long overdue.

And so now we have no recourse but to stand vigil in front of Eliot Spitzer's office. Until the unanswered questions about 9/11 are laid to rest, by a truly independent investigation that does not declare legitimate avenues of inquiry off-limits, they will continue to haunt our country - and whoever sits in the White House next year.

------------

Cynthia McKinney, a five-term U.S. Congresswoman from Georgia's fourth district from 1993 to 2003, won this year's primary as the Democratic nominee for her former seat and is favored in tomorrow's election. Catherine Austin Fitts is a former Assistant Secretary of Housing under President George Bush Sr. and a former managing director and board member of Dillon, Read & Co. Inc.

well three!
http://www.dunwalke.com/introduction.htm

Hon. Condoleezza Rice
National Security Advisor
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

April 9, 2004

Dear Ms. Rice:

I am writing to communicate four points regarding your testimony
yesterday under oath before the National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks Upon the United States.

Point #1: You are a liar.

Attorney General Ashcroft sits on the National Security Council.
Warned by his FBI security detail, the head of law enforcement for the United States knew to avoid commercial airlines on September 11, 2001.
It was your job as National Security Advisor to make sure that the people who flew on American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines Flight 175, United Airlines Flight 93 and American Airlines Flight 77 had the benefit of the same warnings as those they paid to protect us.

You knew. You kept silent. They died.

You had numerous warnings of the risks of 9-11 - sufficient to let the American people know and use their best judgment as to how to protect themselves from a possible attack. It was your job as National Security Advisor to make sure that the people in the South Tower of the World Trade Center had the knowledge they needed to evacuate their building upon seeing the North Tower hit by a plane.

You knew. You kept silent. They died.

Point #2: Your motives are transparent.

The World Trade Center is in the heart of New York City - one of the great financial capitals of the world. The Pentagon is in the heart of Washington -- the appropriation and accounting capital for the US federal budget and credit and the US Treasury - the largest issuer of securities in the world.

Unlike many other terrorist attacks, these attacks killed people whose family, friends and neighbors understand how these financial systems work.
Victim families, friends and the residents of the communities directly harmed can calculate who made money on 9-11 profiteering. They can trace the flow of money into the 2004 Presidential campaign coffers from the profits your supporters made as a result of 9-11 profiteering. They can calculate how 9-11 profiteering connects to the financing and silence of corporate media.

Those personally impacted and the global researchers they network with have the intellectual power and personal courage to ask and answer, "Cui Bono?" (Who Benefits?) They understand that your success as National Security Advisor is as a direct result of your failure to stop 9-11. They can see how your lies about 9-11 made money for the investment syndicate that put you in power and for the buyers of US Treasury securities who are so richly paid to finance the US military, intelligence and enforcement apparatus and the defense contractors and oil interests it serves.

All the campaign ads in the world can not now convince the American people that you have their best interests at heart.

Point #3: You are going down.

The richest and most powerful people in the world pay for performance. They pay you to make the US governmental apparatus look legitimate while they use it to centralize economic and political power. That means they need liars who are better at lying than you.

The myth that you had no idea that Americans deserved to be warned about the risks of flying or planes being used as weapons is now in the dust heap with the notion that the United States attacked Iraq and our soldiers are dying to protect us from Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

Your lies of 9-11 - like your lies about the Iraqi war - have been profitable for the military-banking complex you represent. These lies, however, have not misled the crowd. The American people and global citizens are looking for the truth. We demand the changes that will give meaning and honor to those who died on 9-11 and in the ensuing wars. We demand an end to further bloodshed. We demand a refund of all that you and your backers have stolen from those of us who remain alive.

Point #4: You are guilty of criminal gross negligence.


If you want to catch a terrorist today, you need look no further than your own mirror.

Many Americans gather this weekend to give thanks that Jesus died for
our sins and gave us the covenant of grace. In the spirit of our Lord's crucification and resurrection, may God have mercy on your soul.

Sincerely Yours,



Catherine Austin Fitts
Former Assistant Secretary of Housing, Bush I
President
Solari, Inc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. This is astounding. What an amazing woman. I will keep
watching what she has to say. I have bookmarked the Solari site. Thanks for the links and info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. So true,,,
Its bewildering how they are "getting away with this" :shrug:?

How does this happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. FWIW, a cross-post from an interesting thread about these networks
"Elizabeth CHENEY was also a 'colleague' of Wolfowitz's partner Shaha Ali Riza"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x548152#651509
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wrote on this in detail in 2005 back when he did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. From link
Listening in without a warrant isn't just impolite, it's a felony.

Image by Doug De ClueThe Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (USC Title 50 Chapter 36 Subchapter 1) specifically prohibits the government from doing what the President has secretly ordered and it is a serious felony with major penalties.

The President has publicly confessed to this felony on national television. He ordered government agencies to engage in spying on thousands of American citizens without a warrant when the Congress made specific provisions in law to cover all circumstances, even emergency situations so that the government could listen in for up to 72 hours before obtaining a warrant, plenty of time to find and convince a judge.

There is no excuse for this action, yet the President has done so anyways.

http://www.brainshrub.com/president-wiretap

Impeachable and yet no movement in Congress.

Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Have to get Republicans to sign on...
it will take some hearings which the Democrats can force before the Republicans will be willing to vote for impeachment. It will take at least 1/3 of the Republicans to sign on before impeachment becomes feasible. So in other words we have to show them another "smoking gun" while we control the Congress and the subpoenas, although we already have the FISA law thing and many other problems such as the Federal Fraud statute, conspiracy statute, obstruction of justice, etc., etc.


Doug D.
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. My take on it
Just start the process. In fact it is the obligation of House Reps to do so in this case regardless of what the outcome MAY be or what the perceived political fallout MAY be.

It really doesn't matter whether Impeachment succeeds or fails, it is a process required to protect the Constitution as noted duly by the oath of office by Reps. Once that is made clear to the public through this process the rest will fall in place. Impeachment will gain overwhelming support and the votes will be there.

There is nothing more dishonest or more reprehensible than the possibility of this Admin getting off to rest in Texas in their solar pads. Those who are in Congress and not crying out for impeachment, and more, are shirking their duties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Cry out for an INVESTIGATION not impeachment...
and let the investigation take its natural course which will lead to impeachment.

If you start with the I word, it just won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Communities all over the country are passing resolutions for IMPEACHMENT
IMPEACHMENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. I understand that and feel the same way but we have to get those Republicans cornered
so that they have to vote for it.

Investigation that leads to impeachment.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. You know, I think the rats will run before the I proceedings begin
if we keep the pressure on.

They're cowards. We know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Again - WHO is going to impeach him/them?
Nobody.

Congress is a eunuch and refuses to act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. PLEASE don't link to Vdare.
Edited on Fri Apr-13-07 11:10 PM by Marie26
Named after Virginia Dare, the first white baby born in the US. They're a white nationalist group that's devoted to preventing any non-whites from immigrating to the US. They're just to the right of Stormfront.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Weird
Who knew?

Damn hard to keep track of everything. Random googling takes you all over I guess.

Pretty bizarre someone would name a website like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It is weird.
Sometimes, the far left & the far right seem to meet - this is one example. Paul Craig Roberts is a far-right wacko who's managed to get a following on some liberal blogs. His articles have popped up here before - so I can understand how you could google onto his article w/o knowing his background. He is anti-Bush, but he's also quite racist, & is a contributor to Vdare & other hate sites.

VDARE report: "Keeping America White" - http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=285
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yikes! I went to that site and thought the "White Doe" was weird & then I read their bio etc.
Very anti-immigration and other xenophobic leanings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. The thing is, Junior started the wiretapping BEFORE 9/11.
He has no 9/11 defense for violating FISA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. American democracy has become dysfunctional.
We do nothing more than enable the criminal Bush regime with paper tiger demands when our Congressional leaders tell Bush "You Must Negotiate Over Iraq." I can almost hear Bush's reply: "Yeah? Or what?!" Even that half-wit is smart enough to know they won't call his hand on this or any other issue. It's a damn shame really. No Guts - this from a country built by courageous ancestors who often gave their lives for the principles embodied in our Constitution.

Congress be damned. I say Impeach the Bastard!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Unfortunately, American democracy is an oxymoron! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC