Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dingell, Grijalva, Sherrod Brown all OK with the Speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:27 PM
Original message
Dingell, Grijalva, Sherrod Brown all OK with the Speech
On a conference call with reporters just now, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) said that Obama's decision to adopt Sen. Max Baucus' $900 billion financing scheme was a "major concession," but gave Obama high marks for his statement on the public option.

"He wants to always be open to ideas...but he sets his standard. And the standard is it's gotta offer better choice... it's got to discipline insurance companies... and it's got to bring prices down," Brown said in response to a question from TPMDC. "The other options don't even come close to doing it."

Brown's statement amounts to a belief that Obama has implied a demand for a public option.

More: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/brown-obama-implicitly-demanded-a-public-option.php?ref=fpb


Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) is a single-payer supporter, and no parser of words, but he tells me he thinks President Obama did a superb job tonight, and increased the chances that a public option will survive the legislative process. . . .

"I think a). he was clear enough and b). he was strong enough because he made it plain that the public option was the way to create an absolutely necessary thing for the bill to succeed--and that is competition."

More: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/dingell-obama-made-the-public-option-more-viable-with-this-speech.php?ref=fpb


Grijalva's bar was admittedly pretty low: "The fact that the public plan was not thrown under the bus keeps our expectations that we'll be able to work with at least the House leadership to pass a strong public plan," Grijalva said.

"If he would have mentioned nothing of a public role in health care it would have made our effort much, much more difficult," Grijalva added. "Going in we really didn't know what the President would do."

As I reported earlier today, a planned meeting between House liberals and Obama scheduled for yesterday never happened

Noted Grijalva: "The fact that he didn't mention triggers is encouraging. the fact that he didn't mention co-ops is encouraging." (The President did not use either the word trigger or the word co-op, but he did allude to both policy proposals)

More: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/grijalva-were-glad-obama-didnt-throw-the-public.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC