Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon War Room: Justice To White House - Let's Try To "Muddy The Coverage" On Firings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 02:56 PM
Original message
Salon War Room: Justice To White House - Let's Try To "Muddy The Coverage" On Firings
Edited on Fri Apr-13-07 03:17 PM by Hissyspit
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/13/we-are-trying-to-muddy-the-coverage

‘We are trying to muddy the coverage.'

From today’s document dump, an email from Justice Department spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos to Bush counselor Dan Bartlett and Cheney aide Cathie Martin on 3/6/07, one day before several purged U.S. Attorneys testified before Congress:

Right now the coverage will be dominated by how qualified these folks were and their theories for their dismissals. We are trying to muddy the coverage up a bit by trying to put the focus on the process in which they were told — I suspect we are going to get to the point where DOJ has to say this anyway. First, it is true. Second, we are having morale problems with our other U.S. attorneys who understand the decision but think that these folks were not treated well in the process.

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/04/13/justice/index.html?source=rss

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. "muddy the water" = "obstruction of justice"
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why the need to "muddy the coverage." If you didn't do anything wrong you don't have anything to
hide as the repuke meme goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. where is the other post on this?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. An hour ago, but I've reinstated post since it is slightly different
and has comments and two posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. thank you for resposting
:hi:

Tadpoles muddy the water, gov't attorney's that confuse the issues and deflect an investigation obstruct justice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC