|
Now, about the adjective "young"...I use it in the sense of comparison with my own age (nearly 69). I suspect that my friend is in her early 40's.
We began a friendship several years ago when she started taking guitar lessons from me at my guitar store in this small, East Texas town. I recognized after just a few lessons that she had great intelligence, talent, discipline, and desire to learn to play the instrument. I also learned that she was a member of the Church of Latter Day Saints which maintains a meeting place for a small congregation in a nearby town where she resided.
Soon, the question of my religious philosophy came up. I was pleased with her reaction to learning that I consider myself a Secular Humanist. She accepted that fact with a smile and asked me, politely, to tell her something about that philosophy, information that she received without the slightest condemnation on her part. Before the summer was out, she became a very good friend to my wife and me. My wife began taking a course of Pilate exercises at the young woman's small studio.
I was always impressed with the studious manner she adopted whenever questions of politics, education, religion, et al, were discussed. Without blurting out a preconceived opinion, she seemed to carefully consider the proposition before offering her contribution to the discussion. I don't know how to describe the aura of her presence among us but I think the terms "naive", "fresh", and "open" would have to be in the mix of identifying expressions.
Anyway, she was involved in an auto accident and was moved to her sister's home near Houston. We didn't get to see her nor hear from her for nearly two years. Then, just yesterday, she called from the old guitar store that I sold last year and asked if she could drop by for a visit. I was delighted to hear from her, told her I had just finished making a batch of salsa, and invited her to come right over. We sat on the front porch, watched with delight the antics of the hummingbirds gathered around the feeders, "pigged out" on salsa and chips, and took up the great conversation where we had left off. As you know, there were many new political developments that had occurred during her absence that we could discuss.
We discussed old issues as well. She informed me that the LDS position on abortion would allow that procedure in the event of rape or incest, but discouraged its application as a method of birth control. That was delightful news to me. Then, we came to the subject of universal health-care. She stated that she had heard both good stories and horror stories about government supported health-care in other countries. She had lived for a short time in Germany and, for a shorter time in Canada, but had not had an opportunity or the circumstances to experience health-care in either country. I explained that I had not had any experience at all at living in other countries (though I did spend some time in Oklahoma, a very foreign country) but that neither she nor I could make an objective judgment upon the public health-care of other countries. I suggested that there must be, among those who represent us, the intelligence and experience to make a valid judgment on the various aspects of universal health-care of other countries, perhaps even proposing a unique American approach that would work for our citizens. Still, she expressed reservation for the concept of government-supported universal health-care.
I then proposed a basic question...and her response startled me! "Do you believe that health-care is a basic right for all?" My religiously devout, kind, intelligent, thoughtful friend replied, "No". I sat there speechless for a few seconds during which her cell phone interrupted and terminated our conversation. With pleasant "goodbyes" and heartfelt promises to resume the "great conversation" soon, she was on her way.
Thus, here I sit, completely puzzled. If the kindest among us doesn't recognize a basic right to health-care, how can we hope to prevail in our quest for universal health-care? We know that corporate greed, coupled with rabid racism of anti-Obama teabaggers, birthers, and deathers is the major obstacle to overcome. But, I never imagined that intelligent folks, devoid of prejudice, would hesitate to support universal health-care.
I can't wait for her next visit. There must be some explanation for her position on the issue. I'd sure like to know what it is.
|