Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was there this much controversy when Reagan & Bush Sr. gave school speeches?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:48 AM
Original message
Was there this much controversy when Reagan & Bush Sr. gave school speeches?
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 08:51 AM by Dulcinea
From Yahoo:

Gibbs said former Republican presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush delivered similar speeches to students. He said Obama's speech will not be partisan but rather a chance for children to get "a little encouragement as they start the school year."

So why are people freaking out over Obama's "stay in school" speech?

A black president encouraging kids to get a good education? Oh, the horror!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. They were White - what do you think
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 08:51 AM by FreakinDJ
Just like Rush LickBalls said - "Its ALL about Race"

The GOP has really sickened me as of late with the "Full Court Press" against Obama as of late. I am a white person my self and I just hope people don't forget what is going on here come election time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. pssss...he's half black
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. They weren't "n_____s"
We have a LOT of bigots showing their true self. If I find out any parents I know did this, there will be hell to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Congressman Dick Gephardt (D-MO) made quite a fuss about Bush I's speech in 1991
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 08:53 AM by slackmaster
It's Googlable if you are interested.

He said Obama's speech will not be partisan but rather a chance for children to get "a little encouragement as they start the school year."

That's a nice sentiment, and I don't question President Obama's sincerity, but any speech made by an elected official is going to appear partisan to some people no matter what content it delivers. When a President uses the bully pulpit to deliver a message, ANY message, his opponents are duty bound to at least make the appearance of demanding equal time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Got a link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Here's one to an archived New York Times article
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 09:00 AM by slackmaster
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/04/us/financing-for-a-bush-speech-is-attacked.html

Financing for a Bush Speech Is Attacked
Published: Friday, October 4, 1991
Sign in to Recommend

Democrats assailed the Bush Administration today for spending $26,750 in taxpayer money to hire a production company that oversaw President Bush's telecast from an eighth-grade classroom here to schoolchildren around the country on Tuesday.

The money came from the Education Department's salary and expense budget. As a result, Representative William D. Ford, the Michigan Democrat who heads the House Education and Labor Committee, demanded that Education Secretary Lamar Alexander appear before the committee to defend his "spending scarce education dollars to produce a media event."

Mr. Ford threatened to hold up action on the multibillion-dollar Higher Education Act until he received an explanation.

And the House majority leader, Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, said, "The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the President."...


Funny, it's usually Republicans who are on the war path for what they see as inappropriate use of public money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It doesn't sound as though the Democrats objected to the message, only the expenditure.
I don't recall people screaming that Bush was trying to indoctrinate their children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I have no doubt that some people were saying just that
But they didn't get much coverage.

Remember, 1991 was before the explosion of the World Wide Web. In '91 there were traditional newspapers, broadcast TV, CNN, and a couple of other cable outlets. Widespread Internet use has changed many things in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Got a link? n/t
"some people"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Good that they would be concerned about the expense then
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 09:52 AM by JonQ
but not now.

Afterall in 1991 we were in the worst recession since the great depression and had a trillion dollar deficit.

Unlike today, when we are rolling in money.

And he didn't just mention the expense, but "paid political advertising".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Yes, someone may have objected but...
there was no comparison to this firestorm. It is false for the media to report that the "Democrats did it too when Bush and Reagan gave speeches". There is no comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of course not - they weren't black Democrat "moslins" born in Kenya
Besides, they weren't trying to indoctrinate the children with Nazi socialist ideas like paying attention in school and learning things. They were talking about good Christian values like low taxes for the rich and the need for strip searches to keep us safe from terrorists.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. I know what it is here. It is racism. More than one person has said
that that n****** has no business talking to the children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. whoever cited that song from South Pacific is right on the money:
You've got to be taught
To hate and fear,
You've got to be taught
From year to year,
It's got to be drummed
In your dear little ear
You've got to be carefully taught.

You've got to be taught to be afraid
Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
And people whose skin is a diff'rent shade,
You've got to be carefully taught.

You've got to be taught before it's too late,
Before you are six or seven or eight,
To hate all the people your relatives hate,
You've got to be carefully taught!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. That's really sick. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Got any evidence to back that up?
Besides your own stereotypes for instance.

Like, were these same people cheering when Clinton did similiar things?

I think it's a democrat thing, more than a black thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yep, my ears. Unfortunately, for me, I fit the stereotype, small
business owner. They started that shiat the day after he was elected, and they make no bones about it, among their "own."

And it is not the native population here. It is the "blue staters" who retire here that I come into contact with. Everything is racial. It is not 30 years of Reaganomics, shipping our jobs overseas, NAFTA, or any other thing.

I don't argue with them, because I know that once they finish with me, they will retreat behind their gates and bitch among themselves, but it is depressing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. The parents who are pulling their kids on Tuesday...
what kind of message is that sending to kids?

I think a move like that will come back and bite a parent on the ass really quickly. It's healthy to question authority, but to tune it out completely is just ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. No, There is something much deeper going on here which our
Party chooses to ignore.

Yes, there are some racial undertones.BUT,it is more about
POWER. The GOP has spent the last 40 years demonizing the
word Liberal. There is a method to their madness. There
is a goal, believe it or not. Never forget PNAC. Just
because it is no longer discussed, does not mean all
their objectives were simply thrown away and they
disappeared into the night. The GOP does believe
they are"Right". Their system is the only system,
and if you believe they have given up that dream of
50 year GOP rule: I have a couple of bridges for sale.

Having said that:
They pretty much destroyed the word Liberal. We rolled
over defending nothing, and called ourselves Progressives.
This is a big joke to them. They just point out Progressives
were so afraid of being called Liberal they changed their
name. This casts the Party as weak and no core values.

The goal here is to demonize any Leader or any personality
who might have a chance. Never Permit the Democrats
to get a strong foothold.

Obama was a threat, not because he was black but because
he was popular. Being Popular was a threat to their party;
because, yes, he might influence a large number of Americans.
The Republicans cannot have that. The Democratic Party
has to be seen as weak and ineffective for GOP to regain
Power and live out their 50 year dream. While race is
thrown in as Red Meat, this is much deeper than Race.
Obama's Popularity had to be ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. That's definitely what's coming from the top-down.
But to elaborate - the means of achieving that objective is through manipulation of their own followers. I don't think the parents pulling their kids from class are thinking about thousand-year one-party rule, they're simply reacting - without thought. The leaders have so effectively tapped into the hate, they can say anything - anything at all - and get the intended reaction. How do you stop that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. There's no way to stop it, I'm afraid. Unless something extreme happens, it's too late.
I think this place will start getting pretty ugly in the next few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. Like a women said on our local news last night
Obama is trying to brainwash the kids with Socialism just like Hitler, of course she will take her kids out of school that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well those two looked like real presidents
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC