Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suicide Bomber Attacks Iraqi Parliment Inside the Green Zone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 08:50 AM
Original message
Suicide Bomber Attacks Iraqi Parliment Inside the Green Zone
Explosion Hits Iraqi Parliament; 2 Dead

By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA
The Associated Press
Thursday, April 12, 2007; 9:20 AM

BAGHDAD -- A bomb exploded in the Iraqi parliament's cafeteria in a stunning assault in the heart of the heavily fortified, U.S.-protected Green Zone Thursday, killing at least two lawmakers and wounding 10 other people.

The blast in the parliament building came hours after a suicide truck bomb blew up a major bridge in Baghdad, collapsing the steel structure and sending cars tumbling into the Tigris River, police and witnesses said. At least 10 people were killed.

The bomb in parliament went off in a cafeteria while several lawmakers were eating lunch, media reports said. In addition to the two dead, state television said at least 10 people were wounded.

After the blast, security guards sealed the building and no one _ including lawmakers _ was allowed to enter or leave.

A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad said no Americans were hurt in the blast.

The bombing came amid the two-month-old security crackdown in Baghdad, which has sought to restore stability in the capital so that the government of Iraq can take key political steps by June 30 or face a withdrawal of American support.
LINK

More blood on Bush's hands. Fucking surge...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick for steel pots.
Edited on Thu Apr-12-07 08:58 AM by lonestarnot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another 100,000 troops should help secure the place
Or maybe that's another 1,000,000 troops?

Get ready for Surge 2.0 that will be a new and improved version of Surge 1.0 with all the upgrades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. For those who are keeping count, we are already into Surge #3....
Bush has already increased the number of 'surge' troops twice since the number he originally announced.

Or does he not count National Guard involuntarily called up who do not have proper training or equipment to be deployed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. I stand by my comment that the NG is not being properly trained and equipped before deployment...
It is no slam on the National Guard, but rather an acknowledgement that we are not providing them with the proper training and making sure they are properly equipped before throwing them into the Iraqi environment.

They are being involuntarily deployed, and the training that the full-time troops have received before being deployed to Iraq goes way beyond anything the Guard received.

I have no idea about Texas National Guard, but I do know that a lot of the equipment that the North Carolina National Guard took with them was not designed for use in a desert environment and therefore has not held up for use over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lester222 Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. If IED losses are down by 40% then why are the .....
.... average daily casualties at an all time high? Am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lester222 Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Actually, I got the numbers from www.icasualties.org
They clearly show a gradual rising of casualties over time, when you perform a linear regression of the
monthly average values. Are you saying the data on that site are wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. No, he is hiding behind the anecdotal
and unproveable. That way you can say anything and not be challenged on it substantively. Of course this is further insulated by the claim to troopdom. After all, only a real anti-American liberal would argue against a trooper, right?

Those that have real credentials have little need to spout them off in the first few posts on a message board. The value of their information should speak for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. "The majority of the Iraqi people are happy to have us there"
Edited on Thu Apr-12-07 09:45 AM by Zodiak Ironfist
Show me a poll that says that. You know, there was just a HUGE set of protests in Iraq asking us to leave just two days ago. The prime minister wants us to leave, and the world wants us to leave. And casualties of Americans is up since the surge, and so are the Iraqis.

Where are you getting your news? Fox? Worldnet daily? Newsmax?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. why aren't you there?
Or your kids? Why is your contribution limited to trolling message boards to support the war? Why not fight in it? Are you a -gasp- coward?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Those are anecdotal and unproveable.
If you want to play reindeer games on DU, you need to not hide behind "I'm a troop" BS with unverifiable crap. If you serve, thank you, but that does NOT make you some kind of vaunted expert and does not give you more credence to be heard on DU. There are vaunted experts who are collecting info in Iraq who are far more credible than our propagandized, holed-up-in-the-green zone military.

Polls gague people's opinions....troops have big guns in their hands and scare the crap out of people. I'll listen to the polls, thank you, rather than the unproven and anecdotal assertions of some brand-new DUer.

Verifiable facts are the grist of debate. Unproven assertions and internet claims of expertise on an anonymous message board do not cut it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. The same way the death of Palestinian and Iraqi civilians by Israeli and US weapons
...is blamed on Hamas and "al Qaeda".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Wrong interpretation
If Hamas blows up civilians, it's Hamas's fault. If the Israelis kill civilians in the pursuit of Hamas operatives, it's Hamas's fault. The same (ir)rationale was used by Israel in Lebanon and is used by us in Iraq. It's NEVER our/Israel's fault when civilians die no matter who pulls the trigger. That's what I call BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Enjoy your stay here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. So you and George Bush are convinced the surge is working?
Your statistics are not verifiable, and do not dovetail with the reported rise in deaths and attacks since the so-called surge began.

Are you in Iraq? Have you been getting your stats from Bush(who also is not in Iraq)?

They sure do not back up what Gates is telling Congress. Imagine that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. bush using the term "surge" is just different way of saying "Bring it on"
As we can see, his challenge has ended with the same results as his original "challenge", US soldiers and Iraqis are dying in even greater numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC