Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2003-- Ashcroft DoJ gave WH 24hours to "clean e-mails" (Plame)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 07:46 AM
Original message
2003-- Ashcroft DoJ gave WH 24hours to "clean e-mails" (Plame)
Just so we don't forget.


It Appears that Ashcroft Gave the White House 24 Hours to "Clean Up" Their Files Before A Memo Was Sent to Save Documents: Who Will Investigate the Justice Department for Potentially Facilitating Obstruction of Justice?

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/03/10/02_ashcroft.html

She stated that at the request of the White House, the DOJ deferred for 24 hours the request that all documents, email, logs be held and preserved in the investigation of the Plame outing.

NPR legal correspondent, Nina Totenberg: Well no administration ever wants an independent overseer, and there are very good career people who are in charge of this investigation, but it could get hairy. Yesterday I talked to a former justice department official who wondered to me why the White House had asked the Justice Department if they could wait a day, earlier this week, before directing the White House staff to preserve all phone and email records, and why, similarly, the Justice Department had agreed to let the White House wait that day. In the last analysis career people can't make some of the decisions that will have to be made, like whether to call a reporter before a grand jury. The Attorney General under Justice (Department) regulations is required to make that decision. A career person can't make it. And if a leaker is identified and not prosecuted it could raise problems with the CIA. Will the agency believe that a decision not to prosecute was made fairly, or will it, as one former Justice Department
official put it to me, open a chasm of distrust between the two agencies. As I said no administration likes to open itself up to outside investigators. And the temperature isn't that hot yet, despite that poll you cited at the beginning, but it could get that hot, and we just can't know right now whether the temperature will get that hot for a long time and make it impossible to continue the course that the administration now has chosen
to take.


Many major media outlets continue to ignore story of missing White House emails
Tue, Feb 7, 2006 12:33pm EST
http://mediamatters.org/items/200602070004

Last week, Media Matters for America documented how most media outlets failed to report that special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the lead prosecutor in the CIA leak case, wrote -- in a letter to defense attorneys for former vice presidential chief of staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby -- that numerous White House emails from 2003 are missing from White House computer archives. A further review by Media Matters has found that most major media outlets have continued to ignore this story; specifically, no reports on the missing emails have been found on any of the three major broadcast networks (ABC, NBC, and CBS), The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, or the Reuters wire service.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. good catch
I just brought it up in another thread as well - the missing emails from the Plame case were never recovered, if I recall.

and don't forget, during the 2000 Florida recount, Katherine Harris' staff decided to uninstall Windows 2000 from all their computers in order to 'upgrade' to Windows 98...

So, it's not impossible to wipe out computer records as some here are stating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That 24 hour period was outrageous when it happened
I believe it was a Friday night when they got to stay late and get rid of anything they wanted to. Of course it was barely reported and when it was it was passed of as the normal course of business/gentleman's agreement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cue Dragnet theme. Play it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. I remember that..
I saw the moment go by and thought, "Damn"! What are we in for, here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yep - clear the deck
before they turn on the fan. Meanwhile pass me some butter for this :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can Ashcroft be held as an accomplice or at least, an obstructionist of
justice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. SUBPOENA ASHCROFT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let the eagle soar straight to Leavenworth.
Ashcraft is, like his ex-boss, a traitor.

Like when he was warned not to fly commercial back in the summer of 2001:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Wow this is from last week
big Kick there bob

I think we need to keep this in mind throughout all of this. When this happened I was amazed-right in front of everyone they negotiated with themselves time to get rid of the evidence, it was reported on that Friday night (I believe it was a Friday) and forgotten or at least it was supposed to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Aschcroft was part of this
got out while the heat was on he did his duty getting Bush through 911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. In 2004 the DoJ ordered libraries to destroy copies of DoJ docs and manuals
about Asset Forfeiture and Money-Laundering used by DoJ employees as well as researchers and investigators everywhere!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x360539#441230
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. nice finds!
:applause:

And good memory! (Am I the only one who'd forgotten about the 24 hours? I was furious at the time, but so many more things have happened since then.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. An AGAG kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
17. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC