Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think its time to change the term limits of the congress?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:13 AM
Original message
Do you think its time to change the term limits of the congress?
Or rather how long they sit in their seat. I think that the House of Clowns need 3 yrs... this way they have 2yrs to pass major efforts. AND the Senate should be 4yrs. 6 is wayyyy too long for these old men who are out dated and have been in DC culture of do nothing for too long.. Either that, we need to increase the number of reps in the Senate so that we can possibly get another party in... AND because the Senate is soooo horribly stacked in favor of white men, 1 of those 3 seats from a state must include a minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Time for REAL campaign finance reform so lobbyists don't own them.
The voters would take care of the rest. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. No.
I think we need to kill the DC revolving-door lobbying culture and tackle antitrust.

Monopolies are the source of almost everything that is wrong with American-style capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. NO! If they are doing a good job, they should stay. We do vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. No.
Think of all the goofy shit they'd try to do if they knew that they didn't have to face reelection. Congress
would turn into a giant retribution machine, half the time doing idiotic things, the other half undoing what the
last guy just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Campaign finance reform
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Va Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. You make a good point about the House
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 10:27 AM by Va Lefty
WAY too much of their time is spent raising $$$ for campaigns every 2 years. Of course if you had free TV/radio and public financing they wouldn't need to raise all that money! As for your last idea I like it, can you imagine all the caterwauling from the RW if 1/3 of Senate seats were held by "them people"!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. It would require
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 10:26 AM by melm00se
a Constitutional Amendment to make that happen.

a better solution, from a corruption standpoint, would be to approach the numbers detailed in Article I, section 2, paragraph 3:

The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand...

this would dilute the powers of the individual Congresscritter making them, individually, less of a target of attempts to improperly influence. Imagine trying to bribe, coerce, influence 25 times the number of the current legislators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. votes are the ultimate deciding factor for term limits
What needs to change is finance reform and lobbying laws. I say let the lobbies remain, just limit the amount of money they can spread around to a very strict fraction of what they shovel into the gaping maws of politicians now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yes
Serve 8 years and step aside...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wow, its amazing to hear so many happy with the status quo.
How do you get finance reform when it is the people in the seats that must make the rules they have to live by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC