Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyer: Edwards won't comment on ex-girlfriend's child

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:17 PM
Original message
Lawyer: Edwards won't comment on ex-girlfriend's child
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/73767.html

* Posted on Friday, August 14, 2009

Lawyer: Edwards won't comment on ex-girlfriend's child

By Mandy Locke | Raleigh News & Observer


RALIEGH, N.C. — Wade Smith, one of John Edwards' attorneys, said Friday that he and his client will be making no statement today and have no plans to make a statement regarding Rielle Hunter's child.

Media reports quoting anonymous sources circulated Friday saying that Edwards was planning to acknowledge that he is the father of Hunter's baby, Francis Quinn. Edwards has previously said he and Hunter had an affair.

"No statement is planned," Smith said. "We have no sort of schedule or timetable."

Hunter appeared before a federal grand jury last week. Edwards, a former presidential hopeful, is under investigation by a grand jury regarding whether he inappropriately spent campaign money to hush rumors of his affair.

Edwards eventually withdrew from the Democratic nomination for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. The truth will out...
He can run, but he can't hide...

And to think I respected him.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So did I -
I thought he was as good as The Second Coming. He got my money, too, as well as my trust.

Once again, it's the lies and cover-ups that make the whole thing so much worse.

Dick Nixon is cackling in Hades, because no one learned anything from his experience......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. .
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Would you care to clarify?
Sure we have bigger problems.

But this thread is about John Edwards and his actions.

So..how about clarifying?

Well?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. We do have bigger problems. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. and yet you're here arguing on teh internet
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. And too bad he's trying to run and hide.
Wouldn't Edwards, if asked a couple of years ago, agree that denying the existance of one's child is horrible and cruel? I would think so.

I was never a huge fan, but it's sad and disturbing to see him act like this.

Everyone has seen the photos. He would only be stating what is already obvious to the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. This seems to me to be an admission of sorts
"No statement is planned," Smith said. "We have no sort of schedule or timetable."

He should definitely man up for that beautiful child's sake, the rotten sonofabitch.

But they're not denying the DNA report is what I take from that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I honestly don't know why anyone would expect him to
He's already been run out of town on the proverbial rail and really has no responsibility to quench the thirst of the ones who STILL lust for his blood. Everything has already been taken away from him. He doesn't owe anyone else anything.
He and Hunter had a consensual relationship. That relationship produced a child--like THAT has ever happened in this country.:eyes:
Yet--more air time has been taken with this story than with the wide-stanced republicans in bathrooms or republicans who diddled underage pages IN Congress or republicans that escaped out of the country to fuck their exotic lovers while on the company dollar.
Sorry. I just don't get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. n/t (wrong place)
Edited on Fri Aug-14-09 05:50 PM by Maru Kitteh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Time and again when he could have come clean he showed regard only for himself
He insisted the affair ended before the child was conceived. Denying his own child for the sake of his career is repugnant. It is the action of a despicable man with no honor at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Imagine how that child will feel when he is older
To look back in history and see how he was denied by his own father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aspca4ever Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. John you are a slime ball (a lying SLIME BALL)
Something about this extremely too smooth, slick 'Rico Suave' type just wreaked of something just not quite right with this 'slime ball'!

Give me an old codger looking face with lots of Character and that's a man that has worked his way up the political 'PILE'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You signed up just to say THAT?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. +1
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Like Cheney?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annarbor Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Right...
"Give me an old codger looking face with lots of Character and that's a man that has worked his way up the political 'PILE'!"

Let me guess, like Dick Cheney?

You are soooo transparent!

Ann Arbor-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Did you mean "reeked"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. .
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Like McCain, right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Let me guess - a WHITE old codger face? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's got bigger worries with potential criminal charges.
As I recall, it seems he used funds raised for one purpose to support his paramour in a fabulous manner. He may have stepped over the line in doing so. Any who might be charged is wise to shut up and let their attorney do all their talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Criminal charges aren't at all likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You have no idea whether criminal charges are likely.
Edited on Fri Aug-14-09 06:14 PM by TexasObserver
He could be charged with federal or state violations for misuse of funds collected for a valid purpose which were redirected for his personal gain, for an illegal purpose. Paying a bribe is against the law in many jurisdictions.

There are any number of venues where a prosecutor could make a case against Edwards if said prosecutor wanted to do so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't think she's "ex". Unless that stands for "expects to be the second Mrs. Edwards."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC