Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time to “Scrap Health Insurance Reforms”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 11:58 AM
Original message
Time to “Scrap Health Insurance Reforms”
Sorry – but there I said it

If we can’t have a “Single Payer System”
Not even a “Government Option Plan”

Then sadly just drop the issue

I rather the Democrats sit back and blame the RATpubliCONs for run away healthcare cost, discriminatory and predatory Insurance Company practices then pass a round of Health Insurance Industry handouts similar to Bushit’s Medicare part ‘D’

If we pass the Insurance Reforms as the Health Insurance Lobby have successfully implanted into the Bill, then I’m afraid this will give the RATpubliCONs all the ammunition they need to retake the House and Senate in 2010.

Without a “Government Option Plan” organized along the proven effective methodology of Medical, I don’t see any thing that will lower the cost of Health Insurance for the average American. Also given the NEW requirements of doing business I see plenty of reasons the Healthcare Industry will raise premiums

Sorry – under the current provisions it is time to call it a day

Don't get me wrong - I'm ALL INFAVOR of passing Reforms as Obama proposed it, just not the reforms the BlueDogs/Health Insurance Lobbist have proposed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Needed to be said
If we're not lucky, things will get worse instead of better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree
except Obama seems to be leaning more and more toward the Blue Dogs and appears more concerned about protecting pharma and the insurance companies.

Mandating insurance coverage is not going to improve access to health care if the out of pockets are so high that you still can't afford to see a doctor. If the CBO is correct and HR3200 would only have 10 million on the public option in 2019 (assuming there is a public option) I fail to see how that will help most of the 50 million uninsured - and there won't be anyone on a public option before 2013 with this bill.

It looks more & more that we will continue to pay more and get less than anyone else in the industrialized world. We're better off letting the current system collapse rather that settling for faux reform and change only CEOs can believe in.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let the Free Market work its Magic!
Always the greatest hope and ally of the revolutionary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. The health insurance companies agree with you.
In the sense that they know people are demanding reform, if they don't push a bill through that does not include a public option or if reform fails they are toast. As they put it-

"If healthcare goes down this year, you are going to end up with single-payer care much sooner than anyone expected"

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/07/business/fi-healthcare7?pg=1

"The rate of aging far and away exceeds the birth rate," said Sheryl Skolnick, a CRT Capital Group healthcare investment analyst. "That's got to be very scary. . . . This is the biggest fight for survival managed care has ever faced, at least since they went bankrupt in the late '80s."

With Democrats in power and public sentiment strongly in favor of change, the industry can't afford to just say, "No; we're against this," said Julius Hobson, a Washington, D.C., lobbyist for hospitals and insurers with law firm Bryan Cave.

"This time, you get the sense something is going to happen," he said. "So to stand up and just say no is probably not wise, because politically you could get run over."

For insurers, getting "run over" would be the adoption of a so-called single-payer plan, where the government pays all medical bills. Such a plan would wreak havoc on the private insurance market, and is widely viewed as politically unfeasible this year.

So the best way for the industry to preserve the private insurance market -- and derail the campaign for a single-payer system -- may be to go along with more palatable proposals on the table now, said Jeffrey Miles, a healthcare analyst and president of the Miles Organization, a Los Angeles insurance brokerage firm.

"If healthcare goes down this year, you are going to end up with single-payer care much sooner than anyone expected," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. We need health CARE. We can do WITHOUT health insurance.
I am NOT in favor of health insurance reform. I'm happy to allow the free market determine the fate of this industry.

However, I strongly feel that delivering health CARE to everyone is of utmost importance - preferably without being forced to subsidize the salaries of health insurance CEOs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Unrec. I don't agree that politics should come before the lives of the uninsured.
Edited on Fri Aug-14-09 01:22 PM by berni_mccoy
More than 18 thousand Americans are dying each year because they can't afford healthcare either because they are uninsurable (with serious or chronic illness) or they are poor. This needs to stop.

The sick and poor deserved defense and the Democrats must come to their aid.

What you are suggesting is giving up and allowing the issue to be used politically. While I am usually for sticking the repubs with their own backlash, this is not a case where it is morally allowable to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onyourleft Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. You lost me at the first...
...RATpubliCONs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC