Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hypothetical question here....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:41 PM
Original message
Hypothetical question here....
...suppose the loser, wannabe, poseur who legally carried a firearm to President Obama's event yesterday had dropped his right hand from the poster and decided that now was the time to scratch his small balls. And suppose the poster had dropped to a 45 degree angle and covered and concealed the sidearm in such a way that he was bent over in an attempt to scratch his small balls, but through a scope it could look like he was reaching for his large bore handgun. Do you think the sniper (or snipers), who were on a hair trigger, would have loosed a round (or probably rounds) and turned his head into a bloody, cracked egg leaving just the stump behind?

And would anyone fault the President's security detail for taking such action?

But then again this is all hypothetical and probably would never happen, you fucking cowardly freepfucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course not....If that guy sneezed he was gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pat Riot Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. at the very least
he would've been going through life half cocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm thinking that is exactly what would happen. I wonder if SS had a
"word" with the doofus and told him to be very, very, careful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But since he is a Darwin award winner waiting to happen....
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 05:50 PM by Aviation Pro
...I don't think that the word "careful" is in his vocabulary. Likewise the word "prudent."

However, he is the definition of "fucking idiot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. "Darwin Award Winner waiting to happen"
Love it, love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. It was obvious
that they knew he was there. In the news footage I saw, he had a bewildered look about him, because even then he was realizing that his fifteen minutes of fame wasn't going to happen. He wore the gun because he craved attention and confrontation. He wanted nothing more than to be thrown to the ground, stripped of his weapon, so that he could become the new poster child of the NRA. "SEE! LOOK, THEY'RE TAKING MY GUN AWAY!"

That was his first miserable failure of the day. The second was when he went on Hardball. Early in the interview, he looks down (he's got his notes) and begins what was certain (in his mind) to be a grand statement. Twitchy little Tweety, however, had other things in mind and abruptly cut him off, and then hammered him with yes-or-no questions that quickly painted Mister Tiny Penis McGunsville as a hypocritical stooge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I love your writing style...Haha, perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. No doubt in my mind, the moment he crossed from theoretical threat
to real threat... they would have acted. Whether by sniper, taking down to the ground, or whatever. But they would have acted. Why do you think they had officers on him at all times, not just snipers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC