Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two fugging glock killing machines - are you hearing Governor Rendell DUers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:12 PM
Original message
Two fugging glock killing machines - are you hearing Governor Rendell DUers
Yes last night's slaughterer , a man with a history of mental, problems opened fire on those women with two fugging glock killing machines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stand by for defense of glocks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. i am looking at my glock right now, and it seems pretty stable
ill have to call my wife to make sure her glock isnt changing into some sort of monster....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. It's you who are the wild card. Brain chemistry dangling by the thinnest of threads.
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:30 PM by sharesunited
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
73. Indeed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
82. Quick, shoot your glock, before it wanders off killing
Those things are worse than pit bulls. The only other way to save it from harming others is to change it's name to something more happy sounding :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
91. How big is your glock?
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 02:54 PM by LeftHander
Your wife has a glock??

That is kinda hot...


Ignore the glock teasers on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #91
97. lol my glock is big enough, hers is smaller so she can conceal easier lol
she can even carry at the beach in a small purse, that matches her bikini :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
94. If that thing start moving around like some kind of transformer
run motherfucker RUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:rofl: :rofl:

:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. and knowing the spellchecking of freepers ...
some of their glocks flash 12:00 constantly ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. bwahaaaaaa line of the day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. I say we ban weight lifting so this will never happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I second that proposal. Weight lifting encourages men to be aggressive.
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:19 PM by anonymous171
And aggression leads to violence, which is terrible and should be prevented at all costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Furthermore, we should ban sexy hoez exercising in public.
After all, that's what made him do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. No, his mind was warped by a religious cult.
So we should probably just ban all religions, just to be safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I am SO onboard with that idea
Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
81. Which other amendments would you like to discard?
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 02:08 PM by WildEyedLiberal
You've already banned the First and Second. The Third is pretty obsolete, let's get rid of that too. Why not just make our way down the list?

DU and Freeperland: proving once again that, no matter which "side" you're on, extremists just doesn't give a rat's ass about the Constitution or civil liberties.


Edit: apologies if you were being facetious. It's hard to tell on this board sometimes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #81
89. My point was, that if we are going to ban one thing
then lets start banning the stuff that REALLY is dangerous. There was some tongue in cheek there, I guess my "seriously" threw you off, my apologies. I do not want to ban anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
105. Many people would like to ban...
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 05:32 PM by LanternWaste
Many people would like to ban philosophies and ideas that they don't agree with. It's quite common-- some people don't like pot and want to see it banned, others want to see public art displays banned, while still others don't like a particular way of thinking and want to see it banned.

If that were actually instituted, I imagine the rate of 'thought crimes' so many righteously rail against would increase to the nth degree.

Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
95. A religious cult
and the fact that for 19 years no sexy hoez would give him no booty...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #95
102. Yes, I forgot to mention the Healing Power of Vagina.
Christ that shit gets so fucking old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
53. He turned out the lights. Let's ban all light switches too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. No ban all dark. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Someone would cry racism because only the light would be allowed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. exercising or the dark didn't kill the victims....the pistols did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Well technically bullets did. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. not technically. they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I'll bet a good portion of his problem was steroids
After reading his blog entries, he comes off as a roid freak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r - guns don't kill people, guns owned by people kill people
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:17 PM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll bet he bought them at a gun show
It's way past time to plug that loophole.

**cue the scripted talking points from gungeon dwelling NRA shills.....**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Irony: using scripted talking point to setup the "cue the scripted talking points" charge. n/t
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:18 PM by Statistical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
68. Too true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Amazing
NRA profits trump life.
Insurance profits trump life.
Big pharma profits trump life
Hospital profits trump life

Unregulated Capitalism rules forever!!!

Wake up and live y'all - Marley!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. One mustn't question holy dogma
And the High Church of Redemptive Violence has a rather obvious way of dealing with heretics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wut? The NRA is a special interest group, like AARP. nt
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:21 PM by anonymous171
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. bwhahahahahaaa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Oh I'm sorry. I must not be up on the latest conspiracies.
Enlighten me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. the nra has been in my state working on getting guns in bars & state parks
no conspiracy, just stupidity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. That simple
Kill, kill, kill for profit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. EXPLAIN HOW THE NRA MAKES A PROFIT FROM REPRESENTING GUN OWNERS PLEASE nt
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:27 PM by anonymous171
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I don't nornally respond to people who shout
but even you know that assault weapons kill and injure a lot of people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Not really ALL rifles are involved in about 8% of homicides and
That is all rifles of which "assault weapons" are only a small subset.
Handguns are the weapon most used in violent crime & homicides.
If % of crime is the deciding factor it should be handguns not scary black rifles that should be banned.

Please get your talking points right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #38
107. Rifles are used in ~3% of U.S. homicides, not 8%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
57. Assault weapons?
Were these Glock Killing Machine assault weapons he used?

Or just Glock Killing Machine handguns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzy britches Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
98. They sure as hell did kill a lot of Iraqis
but I suspect that isn't what you are complaining about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. how do you think wayne lapierre get his million dollar a year salary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. They don't represent gun owners. They represent gun manufacturers.
They may charge dues from members, but the goodies they get for 'free' from the gun manufacturers WAY exceeds their revenue from dues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Really got any stats on that?
4 million members * 35 per year = 140 million. That doesn't even include donations. My next door neighbor didn't blink at donating $500 this year. Membership is just the start of the methods to get revenue from each member. NRA items, donations, fund raisers, corp partners (lifelock, insurance companies, etc), training & education, licensing of NRA instructors, NRA ranges, private ranges getting NRA charter.

If they only get an average of $35 more per person from all that junk that is close to $270 million. NRA budget last year was $220 million. Not a lot of room in there for "goodies" from gun manufacturers to be a substantial portion of the books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
60. They don't represent gun OWNERS
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:49 PM by Sebastian Doyle
They represent gun MANUFACTURERS.

EDIT: Ooops.... It appears that I now owe RaleighNCDuer a Coke.......



Only the real stuff (from Mexico) in the glass bottle of course. Not that HFCS crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Whose profit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
79. and daycare centers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. Exactly - the special interest of each is to maximize their own profits and
relevance.

Neither is interested in the public welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. What NRA profits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
104. The ones that pay Wayne The Peter a million dollar salary
And buy half of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. It would not matter, there is no gun show loophole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
56. Right.
Because criminals and psychopaths who could never pass a background check and buy a gun from a legal dealer NEVER go to gun shows, do they? Why, they must all get their weapons from the Magical Gun Fairy!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. Or they get them from the estimated 40 - 80 million illegal/street guns.
At least that is what the DOJ under Clinton concluded.

Largest source of felons obtaining a firearm is family or friend. Second largest is illegal/street guns. Combined they made up over 80% of all guns in the hands of felons.

Gunshows made up <1%.

Of course stats aren't as cool as emotional outbursts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
76. What gun show loophole are you referring to? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. And your point is?
Perhaps if we ban gyms, tragedies like this will never happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I'm betting none of the people shot are related to you
Shoot away with your glock, AK47 or the latest killing machine. No need for mental evaluations either - kill away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I like my killing machines. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Who determines who gets a mental evaluation?
Who performs it? Who can predict when a person will snap and use a legal item to commit an illegal act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. I'm betting you couldn't care less about the victims either.
Otherwise it'd be hard to exploit their deaths for your pet political agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. sweet
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. Seriesly?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
51. No comment
Kill kill kill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Yeah - if all women are fat and out of shape, men wouldn't got nuts over them!
That works. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Outlaw celibacy. Vote mandatory sex for lonely people!
Everything seems better post-coitus. The government needs to license and pair up lonely males/females for supervised mating. Call it "Cash for Humpers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
67. No sex since 1990??
Geezus.... and I thought my "dry spell" was bad! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
85. You may have a point there...
A well-laid population is a happy population.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. Works wonders for me.
The last thing I want to do after enjoying the company of my wife is shoot something. I usually just want to :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. What makes a glock different than any other firearm? What does tha have to do with Rendell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Not sure you will get a coherent answer from the OP
The posts have been all over the map
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
44. Handguns have no place in our society. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. I disagree but that is at least coherent instead of putting Glock is a magical class w/ Rendell.
Of course banning all handguns would require a repeal of the 2nd.

“The handgun ban amounts to a prohibition of an entire class of ‘arms’ that is overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose. The prohibition extends, moreover, to the home, where the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute. Under any of the standards of scrutiny that we have applied to enumerated constitutional rights, banning from the home ‘the most preferred firearm in the nation to ‘keep’ and use for protection of one’s home and family,’ would fail constitutional muster.” District of Columbia v. Heller (2008).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #54
74. I'm pro-rifle. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #74
83. But that's like saying the First Amendment only applies to bound books and pamphlets
And not the internet or cell phones.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. We might also take a moment...
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:36 PM by Orsino
...to advocate for mental health care as a right.

edit: ...and a duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. +1. That is the best way to stop/reduce mass shootings.
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:39 PM by Statistical
* Reduced poverty
* Ending war on drugs
* Removing non-violent offenders from prison to substantially increase time served by repeat violent offenders
* Improved mental health system
* Improved Education
* Opportunity for prosperity

All that would substantially reduce the root cause of violent crime.

In this particular instance the only thing applicable is mental health but I think all of them need to be part of a comprehensive plan.

Of course a plan like this would be hard, expensive, and take long time. It is much easier to chant about guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
80. It's also the most complicated.
Not implementing universal health care, that is, but the complex, tedious work of encouraging the seeking of treatment, one person at a time, and of diagnosing illnesses. Creating a society that doesn't glorify violence or prize the setting of citizens against each other.

Labeling guns as the problem is so simplistic that we should be immediately suspicious of it. We must never forget the hard work of getting along with our fellow travelers, giving a hand up when possible, and watching for warning signs. I am not entirely opposed to restricting gun ownership, but guns don't give warning signs. By the time a gun is wielded, it's too late to do anything but react. I'd like us to plan for a world in which guns coexist with mental illness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. I'm with you on this one n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #48
63. Who wouldn't be?
Trouble is- it's only a rationalization for an obsession with firearms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. + 1,000,000,000 - Smartest point on the entire thread
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
75. Are you mad?
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 02:01 PM by Greyhound
Well if you are, you're out of luck.

"No care for you!"



Isn't it amazing how the obvious and simple solutions are always ignored while they scream for the one "solution" guaranteed to fail?

Prohibition doesn't work, never has, never will.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
43. But at least his right to own a gun was in no way impeded.
THAT'S what is most important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. And that's all that matters
no matter how many people are killed. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
49. Killing Machines....LOVE IT
That has to be the best hyperbole of the day.

There are TENS OF MILLIONS of gun owners in this country and 99% (yes...making numbers up) never fire them outside the range.

I currently own 2 shotguns, a rifle and 3 handguns (2 of them are Mrs. Rebubula's). I have never felt a need to shoot anyone and they have never been anywhere but my gun safe and the firing range.

But feel free to demonize an inanimate object...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. amazing that those inanimate objects kill so many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #52
77. Really?
So do you have on video where an inanimate object kills someone? I mean without an actual human having any control over it?

You don't like guns, you don't have to own one. But just like the NRA tries shoving their beliefs about guns down everyone's throats so do the anti-gun groups, what makes them different? Both groups use statistics and numbers to make their points, both have their own spin doctors, both think that they are right and the other is wrong.

I believe that the current gun laws are not being enforced, and that is the responsibility of local, state, and federal law enforcement. Get on their asses and make them enforce the laws, you don't like the laws of your state, start going after legislators to get them changed.

As for me, I'm keeping my Ruger 9mm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #49
69. These weapons were banned up to 2004
Who needs assault weapons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. You are aware no "assault weapons" were used in this crime.
No model of Glock handguns has ever been banned in the United States.

Not in 2004, not ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #71
93. Then you didn't hear the Commissioner at the Press
Conference.
Rendell said glock - he said 9mm banned up to 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzy britches Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #93
99. Rendell is a lying fuckwad
it's just that simple
\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #93
101. That is..
...simply wrong.

I have legally owned a 9mm Glock for almost 15 years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #93
106. I purchased a Glock 17 (9mm full frame) in 1996.
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 05:51 PM by Statistical
The production of NEW standard capacity magazines greater than 10 rounds was prohibited under the AWB.

Once again the Glock pistol was never illegal not in 2004, not for a single day, not ever.

Even when new magazines were banned (1994-2004) existing magazines of which there were millions remained legal.

Learn the facts for yourself. The text of AWB is available. Summaries are available via wikipedia and others.

Don't just parrot half truths by other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #69
103. That's one way to take yourself out of this debate
All of a sudden, every gun in private hands is now an "assault weapon." Dude, weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
59. Maybe a history, but apparently not a record.
Lone gunmen are always tough to detect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. But when the new mind-reading and gun-cloaking technology are perfected,
we'll all be safe. :tinfoilhat:

Nothing against you, but our resources are best spent on safe, sane firearms regulation and free, absolutely confidential mental health services. After all, our former president managed to spur the deaths of many, many people both American and foreign without ever directly abusing the Second Amendment in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #72
84. What do I have to do with this?
I think we agree. There was no way that I have heard so far for the system to know this guy had issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. That's why I said, "Nothing againt you."
We do agree. I have to say, though, that I'm sad that the situation ended as it did. By all accounts, the gunman was a bright enough guy but bright doesn't mitigate profound pain or anger. It's frustrating (understatement, obviously) that no one picked up on this guy's anger to any result that might have saved lives. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
70. NRA Targets Obama
It falsely claims in mailers and TV ads that Obama plans to ban handguns, hunting ammo and use of a gun for home defense.
Summary
A National Rifle Association advertising campaign distorts Obama's position on gun control beyond recognition.

The NRA is circulating printed material and running TV ads making unsubstantiated claims that Obama plans to ban use of firearms for home defense, ban possession and manufacture of handguns, close 90 percent of gun shops and ban hunting ammunition.

Much of what the NRA passes off as Obama's "10 Point Plan to 'Change' the Second Amendment" is actually contrary to what he has said throughout his campaign: that he "respects the constitutional rights of Americans to bear arms" and "will protect the rights of hunters and other law-abiding Americans to purchase, own, transport, and use guns."

The NRA, however, simply dismisses Obama's stated position as "rhetoric" and substitutes its own interpretation of his record as a secret "plan." Said an NRA spokesman: "We believe our facts."
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/nra_targets_obama.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
78. But, the guns weren't harmed, right!?
Thank God! We need to get those back out on the street then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugaresa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
88. reading his blog, he could have ended up a serial killer who didn't use guns
the man was clearly disturbed, and after reading more articles, even his neighbors described him as "a bit off"




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
90. Allegheny County police superintendent Charles Moffatt
was going off on the mags during his news conference wrongly inferring they were illegal during AWB. Wrong - pre-bans were still legal and plenty of 30 rounders existed though they were pricey thanks to the ban.

Said 3 of the guns were legally purchased and that the killer had a concealed weapons permit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
92. So what and btw Glock is not a US company
Blame the Austrians for selling those "evil" Glocks to gun owners in the US. BTW those "evil" Glocks are also used by a large number of police departments!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #92
96. Oh lord. Now you're gonna get them started on rogue cops carrying
'evil' glocks.

I'll just stick with my revolvers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
100. I heard dildos are banned in Texas
Well......that's a start I guess.

LOL :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC