Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I censored myself today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RockaFowler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:03 PM
Original message
I censored myself today
I just saw this on a friend's Facebook page and I almost replied:

why not? if we can elect a community organizer that skatted on all the big votes in the senate and is a socalist at heart, then why not the average person with grounded moral's. who know's she couldn't do much worse in my opinoin!
Comment on The Sarah Palin for President in year 2012? Poll
Source: http://apps.facebook.com/realpolls/results/46d25kt8g


I do love the awful spelling. Maybe I should inform him that socalists skatt all the time . . .
And the grounded moral's bit is funny. Oh maybe I should say something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reply with.. "thanks for that poignant opinoin!"
She'll probably thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. congratulate Sarah for her "moral turpitude" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. wh'y di'd h'e spel'l "socialest" wron'g ?'?
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:41 PM by Morning Dew
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ah.
I assumed he was actually accusing Obama of being a closet Southlander (i.e., from Southern California, SoCal). Perhaps one of those "Hollywood types".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You may be correct - "SoCal ists" are way worse than "socialests"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. I censor myself every single day.
I made a commitment to DU that I wouldn't originate any posts on the Divine Ms. P following her abdication, and I've been true to my word, even though it's been hard.

I like Phil Munger's perspective: http://progressivealaska.blogspot.com/2009/08/california-perspective.html



II. As I've watched the flak come down on Gryph and Dennis Zaki from afar this past weekend and early week, I've been forced to go back and read some of the early Saradise Lost columns I posted, e-mails from other bloggers back in early September 2008, and e-mails from reporters who wanted to pay me for information about the Palins and their kids, that I've never shared outside of our family and close Mat-Su Valley friends.

At the time, I felt that even though the Palin family saga in Wasilla was rich with tabloid fodder, to write about that stuff was a distraction from getting valuable information out about Sarah Palin's inability to govern effectively, her anti-science stance which helps dumb down America and would destroy our country's economy, and her long history of manipulation of "ethics" when it helps her, but ignoring "ethics" when that might also benefit her. I tried to limit my writing about "the family and kids" to commentary about how other media (including blogs) were handling stories, or to commentary about how the adult Palins themselves seemed to keep throwing their own family out in front of the media when Sarah or Todd sensed a need for more attention.

I don't care one fucking bit whether or not Sarah and Todd are splitting up. I don't care one fucking bit whether or not Sarah is Trig's mom (though I believe she is). I thought Sarah Palin should have been able to write a book and make money off it while serving as governor, but the law seemed to indicate otherwise. I didn't file any ethics complaints, but understood where over half of them were coming from, and supported the filers. I still do.

<snip>

• Sarah Palin's impact upon Alaska politics is diminishing rapidly.
• Palin herself is finished as a serious politician, here and elsewhere.
• Dwelling on how crooked, fixed systems (APOC, the personnel board) deal with her accumulated debris, past writing seriously and vigorously on how we need to back legislation that fixes all of this, is worse than meaningless. It is a waste of time and resources. I failed to convince my colleagues of this in November and December of 2008. I'll try again, before the 2010 legislative session.
• Over indulgence in Palin family affairs demeans what the Alaska bloggers have become as a political force.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. I went to Facebook and took the poll that's linked.
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 02:16 PM by Cheap_Trick
Would You Support Sarah Palin in 2012?
69% NO.

I left some comments to rattle the monkey cage, got them to fling their poo.


on edit: It's just TOO easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC