Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry Forces Gingrich To Admit Inhofe Is Off-Base On Global Warming Science

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:00 PM
Original message
Kerry Forces Gingrich To Admit Inhofe Is Off-Base On Global Warming Science
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/10/gingrich-kerry-inhofe/

Kerry Forces Gingrich To Admit Inhofe Is Off-Base On Global Warming Science

Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) engaged in head-to-head debate this morning on global warming. During the event, Kerry challenged Gingrich on his commitment to global warming science, asking him what his message would be to conservatives like Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) who are “resisting the science.”

Gingrich distanced himself from Inhofe, saying:

My message I think is that the evidence is sufficient that we should move towards the most effective possible steps to reduce carbon-loading of the atmosphere.

Via CNN Pipeline (view at link):

Gingrich went on to say that acknowledging the scientific consensus around climate change “is a very challenging thing to do if you’re a conservative” because they associate environmentalism with “bigger government and higher taxes.” Another possible explanation? Global warming skeptics find it lucrative and rewarding to side with the deep pockets of the oil lobby.

Gingrich concludes by arguing it is time for “green conservatism.”

Transcript:

KERRY: I’m excited to hear you talk about the urgency — I really am. And given that — albeit you still sort of have a different approach — what would you say to Sen. Inhofe and to others in the Senate who are resisting even the science? What’s your message to them here today?

GINGRICH: My message I think is that the evidence is sufficient that we should move towards the most effective possible steps to reduce carbon-loading of the atmosphere.

KERRY: And to it urgently — and now…

GINGRICH: And do it urgently. Yes.

If I can, let me explain partly why this is a very challenging thing to do if you’re a conservative. For most of the last 30 years, the environment has been a powerful emotional tool for bigger government and higher taxes. And therefore, if you’re a conservative, the minute you start hearing these arguments, you know what’s coming next: which is bigger government and higher taxes.

So even though it may be the right thing to do, you end up fighting it because you don’t want big government and higher taxes. And so you end up in these kinds of cycles. And part of the reason I was delighted to accept this invitation and I’m delighted to be here with Sen. Kerry is I think there has to be a if you will a “green conservatism” — there has to be a willingness to stand up and say alright here’s the right way to solve these as seen by our value system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm baffled

Did Kerry have a gun to his head or something? (Needs to Be)Neutered said something blasphemous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think it was Newt's ego - he adores his own brainpower and wants to be recognized
as a first class mind. He will always come up short, though, because he eventually reverts back to his partisan comfort zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Very close to my analysis of Newt
Newt is very smart, he has bouts with brilliance, but his analysis breaks down because of his need for partisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Imagine what a great asset he could be to this country if he lobotomized the
portion of his brain that triggers his partisan insanity.

He was almost there after 9-11 when he came down hard AGAINST Bush for shelving Hart-Rudman Report on Global Terror that he also worked on for 2 1/2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I believe the British expression is "too clever by half".
Smart enough to talk himself into trouble, not smart enough to get out of it (w/out complacency of cronies, anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Kerry had a more powerful weapon than a gun to place at Newt's head
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 01:12 PM by karynnj
Kerry was brilliant and well spoken and ran circles around Newt. You know he owned the debate when - people live blogging it on National Review on line quit mid way after a few posts conceding that Kerry was the winner.
http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/



This is not to say Newt was bad. Newt was the best spoken Republican in a debate that I can remember - beating Bush, Cheney, Bush 1, Quayle, Reagan, and Ford. I only remember Nixon with JFK - from that I would add him as well. I honestly don't remember Golwater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please spread this to the Flat Earth Society at FR. Maybe we can use this to pressure
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 01:04 PM by blm
Inhofe to back off his roadblock of Gore's event in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's an important thing to do, but you end up fighting because ...
you don't want to do it.

Great, Newt! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whoa, Kerry does listen, I said really admire his stand on climate change this is his moment, ..
... he's taken it on board it appears good for him. Heard him on Ecotalk the other day, said how he was a supporter of the issue going back a while now. He seemed just as informed as Gore on the issues that face us, hope he gets primary role in administration in combatting our number one issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Kerry has a strong history of working on environmental issues
1970 - helped organize, and spoke at, first Massachusetts Earth Day
1980's - as Lt. Gov. of MA under Dukakis, worked on acid rain and helped bring about first international agreement on controlling air pollution that was causing acid rain
1993 - with Teresa (before they were married), helped found an organization that helps colleges create curricula around the topic of environmental sustainability - http://www.secondnature.org/aboutsn/aboutsn.htm
Around 2002 or so, he and McCain worked on legislation to raise CAFE standard to 36 mpg. Their efforts were undermined by D's as well as R's.

Just for a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. He will have a role in the Senate on it
He and Senator Snowe have one of the competing bills. They have held at least one hearing in the Small Business Committee which he chairs and in the Commerce Committee which they are both on. Kerry also spoke to Senator Boxer's environmental committee and was praised effusively by her and other people on that committee.

Kerry/Snowe and Boxer/Sanders are the most aggressive bills, followed by McCain/Leiberman (which Clinton co-sponsored), followed by Bingaman. I assume that some or all of these bills/people will emerge in a bill or competing bills. It is clear that he will be one of the people involved on this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh the big government argument. How about their big hairy behind government reading the mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. And we certainly know how government has shrunk under Republicon
governance. Boy what a misnomer ~ Republican governance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry cleaned Newt's clock!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Kerry sure did. Newt did more listening and agreeing than anything
Yet, the media makes like it was a big deal that Newt would meet with Kerry and discuss the issue. Always more talk about what Newt did or said than Kerry and Kerry was carrying the ball the whole time. He was Very good. The audience certainly sided with Kerry, big ovations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Posters should go up
"Lower taxes, or breathing ... you decide. Republicans want lower taxes over breathing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What would you trade for YOUR child or grandchild's asthma?
Really - what's a few more dollars in taxes compared to your health and the health of our families?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Recommended-I wanted to see that
Saw it on the CSPAN schedule..I hope they show it again.

Inhofe is quite possible one of the stupidest people on the planet. He gives me the impression of actually believing his own bs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I've been thinking about how stupid Inhofe is and it occured to
me that it isn't a matter of brains it is a matter of sucking up to the oil industry here in Okla. Stupid me. While watching the show this a.m. it went through my mind all the goodies Inhofe must get from the oilies. If it's a farm it must have the best fences in the county, that sorta stuff. Of course the world to Inhofe is flat, it pays to think and talk that way. Will we ever vote that jerk out of office? Oh the shame of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. HERE IS THE LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's the difference between the part of the GOP made up of total fucking idiots
and the part that has a brain but is still full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
When folks like Newt and Wolfowitz admit that we are causing the problem and accept the science, that makes change come about much easier.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Interesting... Gingrich concedes all major points, only debates reform methods
Credit where credit's due, at least his position is relatively practical compared to Inhofe's. From what I read, he and Sen. Kerry were debating what amounts to implementation details, which is where the congressional debate ought to be by now, if it hadn't been delayed by deniers and corporate gladhanders for the last decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. Way to go Senator Kerry!
I'm tired of these "the Earth is Flat" brayers.

This is not a partisan issue ..it's the only Planet we have.

And we are the ones who are being Conservative with the Earth and human and animal life.

Can there be "green fascism"? Sounds like newt's trying to find a niche?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC