Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ESPN bans NY Post reporters over Andrews video

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:21 PM
Original message
ESPN bans NY Post reporters over Andrews video
Edited on Mon Jul-27-09 02:22 PM by DainBramaged
ESPN banned staffers from the New York Post from appearing on any of its programming on Wednesday after the newspaper published photos this week taken from a video showing sideline reporter Erin Andrews nude in a hotel room.

The Post published three images from the blurry video Tuesday.

"While we understand the Post's decision to cover this as a news story, their running photos obtained in such a fashion went well beyond the boundaries of common decency in the interest of sensationalism," ESPN senior vice president of communications Chris LaPlaca said in a statement Wednesday night.

Newspaper reporters are regular guests on ESPN shows.

Post spokesman Howard Rubenstein did not immediately return a call from The Associated Press.

The Post was one of several TV networks and newspapers that aired or published images from the video, which Andrews' attorney says was shot without her knowledge. Andrews plans to seek criminal charges and file civil lawsuits against the person who shot the video and anyone who publishes the material, attorney Marshall Grossman said.

Kelly McBride, a journalism ethics expert with the Florida-based Poynter Institute, said it was unethical for news organizations to show images from the Andrews video.

http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=10774565


The NY Post, the rag of choice of Freeptards in NY City. A disgusting Reich-wing rag.

Erin Andrews’ privacy-invading video stirs outrage, guilt, zillion page views

If nothing else, the Erin Andrews nude Web video flap has produced one moment of high comedy.

In its diligent reporting on the issue, the gossip site TMZ.com ended one dispatch with this: “We will not post this video because it is a clear invasion of privacy.”

Yes, that would be the same TMZ that has videographers scouring Hollywood trying to catch celebrities in the act of leaving a nightclub intoxicated, being with someone who is not their significant other or getting annoyed at the videographers trying to catch them getting annoyed.

Then there was the media Web site — we’re looking at you, New York Post — that railed against the “peephole pervert” exploiting the “sideline siren,” then posted that story alongside a slide show of images captured from the video, complete with black bars covering Andrews’ naughty bits.

“Peephole Outrage,” railed the Post’s front-page headline, referring, I think, to the other people showing Andrews naked.

Beyond the heaping tablespoons of hypocrisy, though — oh, and the fact that most sites still claiming to have the video will probably load malware onto your computer — there’s not much that’s funny here. Andrews, a 31-year-old ESPN sports reporter who also happens to be slender, busty and, by most estimates, beautiful, was apparently filmed illicitly in two hotel rooms naked.

http://www.kansascity.com/entertainment/story/1344776.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TimesSquareCowboy Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gosh, like ESPN would care about any news story subject unless he or she were an employee
How absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't get it. How is this not illegal??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The NY Post doesn't gave two shits about anything except selling more papers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. well, since 1993 ...
Rupert Murdoch (Faux) has owned the Post ...

so, why should ESPN (btw, owned by Disney) give the competition any help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC