Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone know the percentage of Americans employed by the medical insurance industry?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 12:41 PM
Original message
Does anyone know the percentage of Americans employed by the medical insurance industry?
I've heard it's as high as 11 percent. And I have a feeling that a high percentage of that percentage will be out of work for a long, long time.

If they don't get jobs in an expanded Medicare program, they're going to kick unemployment figures into the stratosphere -- possibly high enough to precipitate a 1929-class depression, but without the manufacturing base or FDR's wisdom to pull the country back from economic chaos.

Globalization has only made US workers more vulnerable, and unless Obama gets serious about protecting US jobs and pulls out of multinational "free trade" garbage like NAFTA, GATT and CAFTA, the US will take its rightful place among third world economies.

Any comments, particularly from those who currently work for these bastards?


Full disclosure: I take a back seat to nobody in my loathing for the current scam and my support for a Yurpean-style single-payer system, not some half-assed "public option."


sf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. There are a lot of people who work in medical insurance.
Both for doctors and hospitals and those who work for the insurance companies, themselves. A lot of them would lose jobs if we adopted a Canadian single payer system. Few, if any of them, will lose jobs with the pathetic "public option" insurance that's currently on the table.

Even if we went with a single payer system, however, many of these jobs would become public rather than private. Adjusters would switch employers, but not professions.

Still, in all, these positions are mostly vampiric in nature (sucking time and resources) but doing nothing to improve health care. I will not cry to see them go, but I would support subsidized retraining for displaced adjusters. We need more nurses.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Agreed re middle-men parasites and that training to produce more nurses is mandatory...
Thanks for your reply.


sf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. My understanding is that is the percentage in the healthcare industry
as a whole, so the med insurance industry would be a subset of that.

But I have no idea what the numbers are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. See lurky's post below for the answer... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Too damned many. The real question is how many people are hurt by employing those people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Great point. I was mainly thinking of the relatively blameless clerks and such...
... but the money squandered on utterly useless execs and aparatchiks, as well as salaries and perks for the armies of actuaries and malevolent claims "adjusters" (whose real job is to "adjust" your claim down to zero via technicalities)...

Those shitheels need a stint on the night shift at McDonalds to get their priorities in order.


sf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Surely their skills would transfer to debt collections
With all the 'stimulus' money that went to Wall Street, no doubt ShitiBank et al are hiring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You'd think so, but those salaries and bonuses for all the tireless, ass-busting execs...
...suck up an inordinate amount of cash. Gawd knows pushing paper is "hurd wurk," as some presidential usurper recently said.

sf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. 11% is medical workers ONLY, not insurance.
I was curious, so I did a little looking and found the most recent BLS data:
ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.ceseeb12.txt

In May 2008, "health and medical insurance carriers" employed 448,000 people. At the same time, there were over 138 million total non-farm workers in the U.S. That means that health insurance companies directly employ less than one third of one percent ( 0.324% ) of all U.S. workers. It's not clear from the statistics how many insurance agents, HR specialists, medical billing people, etc, make their living from our health insurance system. Say, just for the sake of argument, that twice as many people (call it a million) fall into this secondary category. In that case, we are still talking about only 1% of the U.S. workforce.

Granted, if you were one of the people whose job was made obsolete by a Canadian-style system, it wouldn't seem like a small thing. But I'm guessing that a new national system would be looking to hire many new people with experience with medical claims...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Great stuff. That's exactly the data I was looking for and have spent way too much time...
...doing lousy research, in the wrong places, to actually find it.

Thanks a lot, lurky.

sf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Glad to help!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fuck em. They produce nothing and hinder the public good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC