I posted this on another thread,and I wanted to explore it further:
There are a lot of long knives out on these boards right now. What we are failing to recognize is that this is a rare teaching moment for the nation with the media and our fellow citizens. As much as I abhor the comments Imus made and the rancid people he has surrounded himself with, this is an opportunity to teach someone how to change and in a very public way. To convert someone from using callous and hateful language to thinking about the impact of his words. This is a chance to create a new dialectic and in the haste to punish, I fear we will lose a catalyst for real change and at a crucial time. People can change and they can learn. If we want to teach tolerance, which we are all so ready to condemn, then let's seize the moment to condemn but truly teach this very public man about people who are not like him AND people who are like him. Learning to recognize your own biases and prejudices when they are mirrored elswhere in society is key to changing the way you interact with others.
Let us rethink the importance of this event and use it constructively.
Lots of intolerant speech has taken place over the last several years. We to have drawn lines and taken stand not to tolerate intolerance. However, I want to take this discussion to a different level. When you say that something cannot exist any more, what takes its place? What fills the space created by shutting down someone's hate speech? Where is that energy displaced? Does it just go underground and resurface later in the form of hate crimes? There are many other people who indulge in this form of hatefulness who need to be censured. Does our intolerance for intolerance also stifle change? Why not avail ourselves of a chance to teach. Is it all about shutting people up without replacing antisocial behavior with prosocial behavior?