|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 10:19 AM Original message |
Remember yesterday’s Washington Post poll that was full of bad news for Barack Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. The "OMG! His poll numbers are tanking!" MSM story is a big case of F.U.D. spreading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 10:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. What's FUD? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:17 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I kinda liked fucked up disinformation! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. It is catchy and fitting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
2. The poll would have been more accurate, imo, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 10:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Oh for God's sake. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:13 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. No, for people's sake, and for accuracy's sake. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:16 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. If the respondent trusts no one, how does their opinion matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 08:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. If you assume that "the respondent" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
5. Recommend. Any time the right is pulling out polls from their pollster lackeys ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC