Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Peter Lance: "Mr. Fitz, in your threat to sue for libel, please, either put up or shut up"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:23 PM
Original message
Peter Lance: "Mr. Fitz, in your threat to sue for libel, please, either put up or shut up"
(Last month, I wrote about the attempt by Patrick Fitzgerald to stop the publication of Peter Lance's book, "Triple Cross". Lance saw my diary entry at Daily Kos, titled, "The Wreck of the Patrick Fitzgerald" and asked me to post his latest piece, challenging Fitzgerald to step up to the plate. So here it is, and I should note to DUers that I ultimately disagree with Lance about the true nature of "al Qaeda"... nevertheless, the attempts to suppress his book simply make no sense to me at all... unless a cover-up is underway. What's the cover-up? That is the question. -rep.)

"Mr. Fitz, in your threat to sue for libel, please, either put up or shut up"

by Peter Lance - July 15th, 2009

Seven weeks ago Patrick Fitzgerald, the most intimidating Federal prosecutor in America, sent my publisher (HarperCollins) and me a letter threatening to sue us for libel if Triple Cross, a book I wrote, critical of his anti-terrorism track record, was published.

Yesterday marked the four week anniversary of the book's pub date and although it's been out for a month, we're still waiting for his summons and complaint.

It was the fourth threat letter that Fitzgerald had sent since October 2007 and the man who’d succeeded in getting New York Times reporter Judith Miller jailed for 85 days in the CIA leak probe, was growing impatient.

"To put it plain and simple," Fitzgerald wrote, "if in fact you publish the book this month and it defames me or casts me in a false light, HarperCollins will be sued."

Continued...
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/7/15/753730/-Peter-Lance:-Mr.-Fitz,-in-your-threat-to-sue-for-libel,-please,-either-put-up-or-shut-up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting theory
So I guess that getting more attention for "Triple Cross" would be terribly upsetting to some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe he decided that since the book has evidently died a well-deserved death, he has other things
to do.

Peter Lance is not all that and a bag of chips. Maybe some of you need to ask the National Geographic Channel why they met with Mr. Fitzgerald's immediate bosses, then censored the special they made out of "Triple Cross".

I'd also like to mention that Patrick Fitzgerald is not the Great Satan, but there are people here determined to paint him as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. After two and a half years of whining, now he's giving up?
Not likely. Seems that Lance has filed a complaint with DOJ, while Fitzy's all hot air.

BTW, who were those "immediate bosses" anyway? And did you really mean to say "censosred?"

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm not doing your research
You're free to search Google for the information.

Furthermore, National Geographic Channel would not broadcast Lance's assertions because of a lack of decent sourcing.

You might want to take yourself off to www.firedoglake.com and ask them a few questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No one asked you to.
Just thought you might want to say who it was that could get something "censored" at NGC. But as they are a Fox outlet, I would imagine just about anyone in law enforcement could.

But Fitzgerald -- whether he's a satan, a bag of chips, or otherwise -- still makes a public ass of himself when he "doth protest too much" about a single book.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, here's Lance's version of the National Geographic story.
For anybody interested;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-lance/triple-cross-nat-geo-chan_b_28270.html

"...All of this is documented in a series of letters between me and Nat Geo Channel executives contained (along with the January 2006 treatment) in a press release on my website.

In effect, NGC ended up replacing me with Jack Cloonan, one of the very Feds that my research had found grossly negligent. Cloonan had two and a half years from January 1996 to August 1998 to build a file on Ali and interdict the Embassy plot and yet, despite evidence from I-49's own files of Ali's direct links to senior Embassy plotters, Cloonan, Fitzgerald and other top Feds failed to detect the plot.

In February of 2001, Fitzgerald went on to prosecute three relatively peripheral players in the plot and cemented his reputation by convicting them of an act of terror that his own "bin Laden squad" had failed to prevent. The fourth operative, Wadih El-Hage had been on the FBI's radar since 1991. Ali Mohamed had stayed in his Kenyan home in the mid 90's as they plotted the bombings. Another agent in Fitzie's squad Dan Coleman, had searched El-Hage's home a year before the bombings and found direct links to Ali Mohamed and yet Fitzgerald failed to connect the dots..."

Continued...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-lance/triple-cross-nat-geo-chan_b_28270.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oooh. A conspiracy!
I think it's comical that Lance will do anything to keep this book in the public eye, but nobody seems to want to read it.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, Patrick Fitzcowardly is a jerk.
Worst Prosecutor ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Its no wonder Rove, Cheney and all played him so easily. nt
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC