|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 08:24 PM Original message |
Army Major Who Questioned Obama's Legitimacy Receives Orders Revoking Orders To Report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. This guy is an officer, no way he can be allowed to pull this stunt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. He won't do time. He'll could well get a DD, but they won't make him a "political prisoner" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 08:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. If it's just Article 88, he'll probably be dishonorably discharged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greybnk48 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. I hope they throw him out of the military. He doesn't belong there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'm not sure which is worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 08:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. She's corrected it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinJapan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. If I were him, I'd be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Could eb a setup, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sukie (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. This freak of a guy is an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. They said he never requested revocation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-22-09 01:51 AM Response to Reply #9 |
47. 'Cook', some people are so aptly named! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. In a court martial the defense can demand proof of Obama's birth and it could be up to SCOTUS to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. So? He's already presented the necessary documents? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Has a federal court ruled on the documents to which you refer? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Why should they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Because that's the issue that would come up in a court martial that you suggest. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. No, it wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. That's a question for the courts to decide and you and I have only opinions. Have a good day. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. No, it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Suggest you read 28 USC 1259 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:49 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. How many times has Certiorari been denied in Birfer cases? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. You said "Civilian courts have NO jurisdiction" and that's clearly wrong as I proved. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. They do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Either you didn't read 28 USC 1259 or you have a reading comprehension problem. Good bye. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Either you don't understand jursisdiction or have never been subject to the UCMJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. UCMJ... try to read a little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-22-09 01:55 AM Response to Reply #17 |
48. That issue isn't even an issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 08:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
33. The Extreme Court refused to hear it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 04:22 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. A General Court Martial would hear the case if charges were preferred as the OP recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. And I am willing to bet that this will be refused by the USSC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. Hi birther! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 08:50 AM Response to Reply #21 |
36. Wow... been here since 2001 too..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrs. Overall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Yes, surprising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
43. AB-SO-FRICKIN-LUTELY NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. His own attorney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. She has pulled it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. And it's still in Google cache |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Good gravy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. I'm shocked...SHOCKED, that someone with an online law degree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. 2 hours? Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
31. okay ... what shi*hole spot in the world CAN this guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
32. So why would these new orders be any more valid than his last orders? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 08:50 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. I guess he's going to deploy, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rwalsh (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
37. This is just a BS political stunt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chat_noir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-15-09 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
38. This birther soldier is also a FReeper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-17-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Well, I've yet to see a birther who's not a freeper. If you catch my drift. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-22-09 12:12 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Yup. The one we have here on DU apparently deserves some kind of endurance award. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeytherat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-17-09 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
41. Of course he can't be deployed - he filed for CO status last week: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC