Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My BS meter is pegging. Why would a program to kill terrorists need to be hidden from Congress?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:11 AM
Original message
My BS meter is pegging. Why would a program to kill terrorists need to be hidden from Congress?
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:13 AM by NNN0LHI
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/la-na-cia-cheney14-2009jul14,0,3609174.story

CIA's secret program: Paramilitary teams targeting Al Qaeda

The agency had a plan after Sept. 11 for paramilitary forces to take out Al Qaeda figures overseas. Congress was never told.
By Greg Miller
July 14, 2009

Reporting from Washington - The secret CIA program halted last month by Director Leon E. Panetta involved establishing elite paramilitary teams that could be inserted into Pakistan or other locations to capture or kill top leaders of the Al Qaeda terrorist network, according to former U.S. intelligence officials.

The program -- launched in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks -- was never operational. But officials said that as recently as a year ago CIA executives discussed plans to deploy teams to test basic capabilities, including whether they could enter hostile territory and maneuver undetected, as well as gather intelligence and track high-value targets. snip

That official and others spoke on condition of anonymity given the acute sensitivity of the issue.

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano declined to comment on the nature of the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. they. are. lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Agree. B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because it was do it in FRIENDLY countries... without those countries' knowledge or consent
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:13 AM by scheming daemons
That's why.

That's the scandal... and our "allies" in Europe would be rightly pissed. It violates international law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Since when did the Bush administration ever care about international law?
You are joking aren't you?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Which is why they didn't want congress (or those countries) to know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. The CIA got caught kidnapping and rendering a suspected terrorist in Italy a few years ago
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:32 AM by NNN0LHI
How far did that investigation go? Did you ever hear Congress or Europe complaining about that breach of International law?

Christ we are still occupying most European counties since WWII.

Like what are they going to do about it?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. wonder if that's what this is all about?
a way to reintroduce the Italy job, and hold some people responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. I think thats quite a stretch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yup...it's a lawless act. MIght even be thought to be a form of terrorism. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. ..Make that state-sponsored terrorism. Sound familiar? (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. So your saying the key word is friendly? Do it in friendly countries?
Tell us how this is not already happening.

And that this is a first of its kind of program for the CIA?

That the CIA hasn't taken out individuals who weren't from al Queda (an American supplied label) before this program that didn't get off the ground?

Boing! Over the top for credibility. A failure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. like PAKISTAN for example?
I remember the Bush admin practically bragging about this policy since 02.

Did they kill political opponents like Dr. Kelly in the UK? Now that would be explosive NOT taking out AQ anywhere they where since that was there STATED PUBLIC policy from jump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. That's what I think, anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. and how about all those reporters killed during these wars?
now that would be a shocking revelation if the HIT TEAMS were targeting civilians.

that they were targeting AQ anywhere in the world was something they boasted about not something considered 'TOP SECRET'

Guardian UK: Dick Cheney's fantasy war


Dick Cheney's fantasy war
New revelations about the Bush administration's secret post-9/11 anti-terror operations demand a full investigation


John McQuaid
guardian.co.uk, Monday 13 July 2009 22.00


When the 2007 film The Bourne Ultimatum debuted, in the twilight of the Bush administration, critics viewed its plot as a metaphor for post-9/11 America's excesses. The movie features a CIA deputy director who oversees the agency's post-9/11 "black ops", casually ordering the killing of a reporter for the Guardian who published details of CIA activities, and lectures a subordinate on the agency's extraordinary new authority:

Full envelope intrusion, rendition, experimental interrogation – it is all run out of this office. We are the sharp end of the stick now... No more red tape. No more getting the bad guys caught on our sights, then watching them escape while we wait for somebody in Washington to issue the order.


It turns out the movie wasn't quite so purely metaphorical. Over the past week there's been a steady drip of disquieting revelations on America's post-9/11 intelligence programmes, and the reality is starting to look something like the Bourne Ultimatum's sharp end of the stick. The most surprising new information came on Sunday, when the Wall Street Journal reported:

Amid the high alert following the September 11 terrorist attacks, a small CIA unit examined the potential for targeted assassinations of al-Qaida operatives, according to the three former officials. The Ford administration had banned assassinations in the response to investigations into intelligence abuses in the 1970s. Some officials who advocated the approach were seeking to build teams of CIA and military Special Forces commandos to emulate what the Israelis did after the Munich Olympics terrorist attacks, said another former intelligence official.

"It was straight out of the movies," one of the former intelligence officials said. "It was like: Let's kill them all."


This particular idea was never implemented, but the Wall Street Journal reported that the agency continued to look at ways it might assassinate suspected terrorists until last month, when CIA director Leon Panetta cancelled the effort, which had been concealed from Congress – reportedly, though not surprisingly, at the behest of Dick Cheney.

Last week a report by inspectors general at five federal agencies offered more insights into the efforts of the National Security Agency and CIA on warrantless eavesdropping. It turns out there not just one, but an entire suite of secret efforts that the report helpfully labelled "the President's Surveillance Programme" (PSP). On top of this came the news that attorney general Eric Holder wants an investigation into the Bush administration's use of waterboarding and other torture techniques. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/jul/13/cheney-cia-black-ops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. Isn't it also because their INTENT was assassination?
IF it's the same program, 60 Monutes did a piece that they reran last Sun. of a secret group went into Afghan., dressed at Afghans, and they lead guy said "They were told to capture or kill bin Laden but we all knew noone wanted him captured, we were to kill him!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly! Thought that this morning. Surely this isn't unusual for the CIA UNLESS
it was! Now I gotta read the OP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Everything's a cover for something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Your BS meter is working just fine.
This is a diversion from the "real' story and the "real" program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. No kidding
Isn't killing the terrorists what the army does already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. Yes, and the deal about the drones
I read that this "program" wanted to kill the terrorist leaders without the collaterol damage of the drones. It just sounded like good-hearted concern for the innocent. How about some apple pie and a flag with that???

There is NO WAY they are telling us the truth on what this program was. And in the planning stages for 8 years? Come on!

There are stock yards with less BS than this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. Since most male beef cattle are steers not bulls
I'm not sure the analogy stands, but I whole heartedly agree with the sentiment.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. It's all a stench
But not quite as bad as this story is putting out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah...and the only phones wiretapped were al Qaeda phones overseas...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
66. Ha! Good one.
Surely those hit squads only operate overseas, too. Hey, you wanna buy a bridge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. If if was never operational, why did it continue for 8 years?
You would think a program would be terminated if it didn't do anything for that long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
35. They went to war in months
But this thing is in the "planning stages" for 8 years.

The person in charge of this cover up ought to be updating his resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. the M$M have custom graphics and theme music to help us all keep score for years
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:18 AM by ShamelessHussy
and they are trying to claim this is the 'TOP SECRET' program that the CIA chief had to shut down - ROFLMFAO

Well, I guess we can bring our troops home now, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. More like assisting in the assassination of the opposition to Musharraf?
Or something similar in Iraq. Assassination squads of opposition leaders that might affect our strategy in either of those regions. Thing big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. "never operational" - in the planning mode for 8 years??????
why am I having a hard time not believing this.

We planned an launched an entire invasion of a country in months. And it takes 8 years of planning for this???

bull roar. Someone is still lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Because they are lying
The Cheneys (Liz & Dick) are going to give up "the assignation squads" but
they are O.K. because they were just going after al Qaeda and keeping us safe
and what not.

total B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. This type of program has probably been around for decades
And I remember one of Bush's earlier speeches in which he said some of the enemy had already been taken care of. Smirk, smirk. I suspected immediately it was one of these programs, and I was probably right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. We already know that defeating al Qaeda wasn't a priority for the Bush Regime.
Who else were they targeting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
54. Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
22. We killed Al Quedas number 2 man
How many times did we hear that crock of shit?
How many times have we heard about cia drones taking out so called terrorists?

They are lying like motherfuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
26. guinness book of world records red herring.
man, if brains were dynamite, these people couldn't blow their noses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
29. My BS meter pegs over this too.
it seems to me training and "inserting" an operative into alqueda would be easy as cake. (It was one of my first thoughts when i learned about Al Queda's recruiting methods.) I then thought bushco was too stringent to even think of such a plan. fact is if it were a real plan and implemented I frankly would be all for it. (unlike Iraq) And do not want to know.

Keeping this program hidden from congress (and the new director) though makes it reak with an even more pungent smell than usual.
it seems that it was really never a plan to implement... other than a funnel of "covert" funds to cheney/bushco. With no one even knowing... Thus no one to ask any questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
31. Concur. This has absolutely nothing to do with "killin' terr'ist".
I am at a loss of what would make the CIA blush. I'm guessing what ever it was it was done on US soil and extremely illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Overall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. My guess is it is something to do with all the bio-chemists
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 01:20 PM by 704wipes
who died in the past 8 years... But maybe my tin foil is just wrapped too tight...


Also since they both, B & C, either actually did or came very close to labeling any dissent as 'terrorism' --who knows how many of those 'terrorists' became very dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
32. This would qualify for a Special Prosecutor.
In my opinion.

You don't make laws on your own, and don't tell the Congress about it, and may be murdering people in the process, under the auspice of the US Government. That is simply not allowed. Congress must know the truth. This qualifies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. We're learning the hurting truth - we can't trust (all of) Congress. Congress must know,
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 10:32 AM by peacetalksforall
then we must know. We pay for it all. We are the ones held to the strictest of the rules of law, especially men, especially African-Americans. We cannot pay for domestic and international law breaking orchestrated and defended by the media and reverends for the benefit of corporations.

Someone said - the core of all crimes is a theft.

The truth appears to be that a high volume of government paid employees are stealing from us for the benefit of a few. This includes accounting and oversight departments who are not doing their job. This includes the FDA which has become a totally bought and paid for department. Every one of the departments, including the so-called diplomatic one.

The CIA cannot continue like this decade after decade. It is time to make peace. It is time to stop the thieving for a few using the structure of government and the phoney reason of defense.

Decades of peace has been lost because of the military-corporate-religious contingent of war mongering hypocrites within our citizenship.

It is time to try them all for treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
36. I smell bullshit, too
This doesn't pass the smell test. I just don't see congress or anyone else be shocked by a plan to kill Al Qaeda terrorists. We offered a $25 million dollar bountyfor anyone who could get bin Ladin, then upped it to $50 million. We went into Afghanistan to root them out (until Bush changed horses). So we use the CIA, too. Just another method, not all that different from what our military special forces were doing.

Why would Cheney tell the CIA to lie to congress about it? It doesn't make sense. THere is a big piece of this puzzle missing.

Mz Pip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
38. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
39. Until a critical mass of Americans admit the "real terrorists" lived at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave...
... for eight endless years, and that their phony "war on terror" is just another of their get rich quick schemes, we'll continue to walk around with our jaws nearly dislocated in amazement.

Their fight isn't against some raggedy assed group of "Islamofascists" called Al CIA-duh -- a wholly owned subsidiary of US intelligence (if that's not too much of an oxymoron) created, funded, armed, trained and deployed to the USSR/Afghanistan border to fight another of the dozens of US-sponsored proxy wars against the USSR.

They're just the designated patsies who must shoulder the blame for "the events of 9/11"(tm) so the Bushies and their cronies could have an excuse for their orgy of patriotic war profiteering.

But regarding "the events of 9/11"(tm)... What do you think actually happened? I'm pretty clear on it myself, but it still astounds me that intelligent, sensible and progressive people still cling to the notion that the Bushies, who haven't told the truth about a single event or issue of any importance since they were embryos, decided to tell the unvarnished truth about "the events of 9/11"(tm)?

Why would they do such a thing? They were bound to lose control of the whole myth; the story's just too dependent on belief in things that are completely impossible.

If we had a functional press in this country, the Bushies would be doing life without parole right now -- and hard time at that. However, the way US media manages news and information is a national disgrace and international joke designed to conceal or spin events rather than simply deliver information. If I want to find out anything of substance about my own country, the last place I'm going to look is any publication or website that originates here.

Elsewhere in the world, among societies where a relatively free press still digs and investigates and breaks actual news of great importance, people have been comfortable for some time with the high probability that 9/11 was a Cheney/Rumsfeld/CIA/USNORTHCOM/BushCo production.

There are serious 9/11 truth investigations underway all over the EU, a couple more in South America and more still in Southeast Asia. Interestingly, these places are, for the most part, expanding rather than abolishing human rights and individual freedoms.

People who live in these places think, with some cause, that Americans are complete fucking idiots to ignore the mountain of evidence pointing directly at the Bushies' role as the 9/11 general contractors. Worse yet, we're even greater complete fucking idiots because we allowed these insane monsters to remain in power, untroubled by any legal action or social uprising. And they just kept getting away with shit.

Maybe their time for accountability and consequences has finally arrived. But probably not...

It's apparently more important to "just move on" than it is to arrest, prosecute and decide guilt or innocence in an open court than it is to sweep US culpability under that Persian or Mesopotamian rug.


Anyway, thanks for the thread... I think.


sf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
67. You have it exactly correct. Thanks for saying it so well.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
41. Because the "terrorists" they want to kill are American citizens
It's just a continuation of their "enemy combatant" program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
42. Obviously because Democrats hate America so much that they would warn the terrorists. Durr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
43. think of it as their program was "unrecommended"
It was controversial, and didn't represent the majority view of the oversight committee.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
45. The list is pretty long of strange deaths and suicides.
David Kelly, as mentioned in a post above, DC Madame, The IT guy who was getting ready to cough up info on Rove...
Others w/ anthrax, biologists. I wish I could remember them all. Does anyone have a list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Here's a list of internationally known researchers, including microbiologists...
... all but two of whom died between "the events of 9/11"(tm) and Feb. 5, 2005. There may be more by now, but this is the most comprehensive list I could find. It's called, with unparalleled respect for the deceased, "Dead Scientists."

An impressive list, I'm told, although I have absolutely no idea who any of them are/were before the fact.

Here's the brief bio on Kelly:

July 18, 2003: Dr. David Kelly, 59
--Expertise: Biological warfare weapons specialist, senior post at the Ministry of Defense, an expert on DNA sequencing when he was head of microbiology at Porton Down and worked with two American scientists, Benito Que, 52, and Don Wiley, 57.
--Helped Vladimir Pasechnik found Regma Biotechnologies, which has a contract with the U.S. Navy for "the diagnostic and therapeutic treatment of anthrax"
--Circumstance of Death: He was found dead after seemingly slashing his wrist in a wooded area near his home at Southmoor, Oxfordshire.


And this interesting observation on the subject, excerpted from this article on "Whatreallyhappened.com":

Now, statistically, it's possible, even likely, that one or two of these microbiologists legitimately were killed in random accidents. But for so many to die in such a short while exceeds all reasonable bounds of statistics. Prudence would demand an investigation, not the "ho hum" attitude of the government which even today continues to issue dire warnings to the general population of how much we are all in danger from "bioterrorism".

So, let's take a moment and step away from the perpetual fear-mongering of the media and assume that some party has indeed decided to "liquidate" weapons research infectious disease experts.

There is really only one reason to kill off a bunch of scientists. To keep them from doing something they are able to do.

What were these scientists able to do? Maybe blow the whistle if an artificially created disease was about to be used in a manner those who created it did not approve of.

Regardless of the exact reason, there does seem to be a clear pattern of targeted microbiologists, and paired with it, an obvious government disinterest in the matter.

I leave it to you to figure out why.



Other victims of their own knowledge include Mike Connell, the IT guy who worked with Stephen Spoonamore (another good Google lookup) and the "DC Madam," Deborah Jean Palfrey.

And another guy named Barry Jennings, who claimed he was hustling to WTC 7 to see 9/11 Rudy after "the events of 9/11"(tm) and instead found a bombed-out lobby, bodies everywhere, interior walls blown apart, crumbling elevator shafts and so forth... Jennings died not long ago, sometime in Sept. 2008 shortly after his story went public for the first time.

Makes you admire Sibel Edmonds' courage a hundred times more, doesn't it…


Standard disclaimer: I have no current or past affiliation with any of the people cited above or the groups supporting the websites containing any of the above information. I've been a "troother" researcher and activist in the past, but I'm now just an interested observer.

Still, I remain absolutely fascinated by the utter bullshit that passes for the "Official Conspiracy Theory" and which has kept this country scared shitless for nearly eight years and counting -- along with the rest of the world, which is getting a little sick of the US' twitchy trigger finger and sincerely hopes it doesn't point at them any time soon.

NOTE: All sites listed above fall into the loose category of 9/11 "trooother" websites or portals. Virtually none of this has appeared in the so-called "mainstream media." Or if it has, it's been spun like the contents of a clothes dryer until it comes out so squeaky clean and content-free that any remaining facts are just accidents.

But filtration is really mass media's job, isn't it, not the free and unbiased flow of information. So the near total absence of any coverage of any of the above seems to me an endorsement rather than a sticking point.


Happy hunting,


sf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. Good Start!
Thanks much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
46. I don't buy it either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
47. because they were killing enemies of the state, not terrorist. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
50. I'm with you, it makes no sense. Lying then, lying now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
51. Here's some tinfoil for you...
OK, it's complete speculation I'm pulling out of my ass, but...

Could this CIA group have been actively helping Osama Bin Laden? Maybe helping Al Qaeda put together 9/11 so Bush could have his Reichstag fire? Or helped Osama escape from Tora Bora?

You know this sort of treason isn't beneath Bush and Cheney.

Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. LIES. LIES. LIES. I don't believe any of it.
The real program Cheney has worked so fervently to keep secret has something to do with 9/11. Dare I say that?

His 'retirement' house is within walking distance of CIA headquarters for god's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
53. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
55. It would if some of the "terrorists" were Americans, none of whom belonged to al-qaeda
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
57. What about Mel Carnahan and Paul Wellstone?
No one has mentioned them yet! And didn't another of John Ashcroft's opponents die in a light plane crash?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #57
71. Now you're talking.
Don't forget anthrax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
58. Maddow makig the same point right now. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. The best the "expert" she had on could say was, "Maybe we were killing the wrong people?"
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 08:31 PM by NNN0LHI
Wonder what that means?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Hmmh...maybe like Dr Kelly? That would have Panetta running to end the program.
Can't Panettta comment on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. I agree and I am so glad to hear that Rachel brought this up!
The smartest host on teeVee by far :bounce:

I hope more pick up on this and don't let the current narrative stick that only serves to make the Dems look weak and distract from the real story which I suspect is truly horrifying e.g. Targeting Political Opponents and Journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Here is the youtube VIDEO link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
61. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:24 PM
Original message
(Criminal) Motive and Opportunity (?)
Plan and Go

http://hnn.us/articles/812.html

"President Bush said Friday that he is scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy — his third — on Saturday. Bush will transfer power to Vice President Cheney for about an hour while he is sedated for the screening test for colon cancer." MSNBC, 6-28-02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
63. (Criminal) Motive and Opportunity (?)
Plan and Go

http://hnn.us/articles/812.html

"President Bush said Friday that he is scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy — his third — on Saturday. Bush will transfer power to Vice President Cheney for about an hour while he is sedated for the screening test for colon cancer." MSNBC, 6-28-02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
65. Because they weren't killing terrorists, they were killing critics.
Like that Kelly guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. Like that Sanford guy. (Paul)
The story has been well scrubbed from most of the net by the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #65
70. Killing critics? Only? Or the Anthrax Squad & the Wellstone hit team?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
68. Cheney needed to monitor everything the CIA, NSA, JD and military
were up to as well as American citizens. He had his hands in everything and we are paying for his evil intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
72. Several reasons:
1.- All programs have to be reported to Congress by statue

2.- It involved hit teams in friendly countries

3.- These teams were most likely fully deniable assets... the kind of the blackest of the black

4.- This is just what we KNOW. I am sure there is more to this that we will probably not learn in our lifetimes... that damn classification thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC