Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: NYT reports Cheney told CIA to hide info from Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:25 PM
Original message
BREAKING: NYT reports Cheney told CIA to hide info from Congress
From MSNBC:

"The Central Intelligence Agency withheld information about a secret counterterrorism program from Congress for eight years on direct orders from former Vice President Dick Cheney, the agency’s director, Leon E. Panetta, has told the Senate and House intelligence committees, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.

The report that Mr. Cheney was behind the decision to conceal the still-unidentified program from Congress deepened the mystery surrounding it, suggesting that the Bush administration had put a high priority on the program and its secrecy.

Mr. Panetta, who ended the program when he first learned of its existence from subordinates on June 23, briefed the two intelligence committees about it in separate closed sessions the next day."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31867022/ns/politics-the_new_york_times/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, he should be hanged as a traitor
but that'll never happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. When you wish upon a star .....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9tTWu-b_ds


Dick had people beaten and tortured to admit to a link between Iraq & 9/11 even though he
knew there never was one. Saddam used to shoot al Qaeda people when ever he could.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. Hanging is too good for Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
59. Please
Stop saying "it'll never happen." Cheney will get his comeuppance. Why do you think he's been so visible--along with his pathetic daughter--in myriad sordid attempts to distance himself from this morass? He can smell the blood in the water, and he recognizes it as his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #59
86. I hope you're right.
The thing that pisses me off the most are the Democrats for godsake who have seemed (at least in the past) perfectly fine with covering up for Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Bush's crimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I want Traitor Dick tried for treason!
Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curiousdemo Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
89. I hope Holder appoint a Special Prosecutor because
the Democrats is all talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. 5 deferment Cheney is nothing but pure evil
Cheney resembles the slime that exists between the seabed and a chunk of whale poop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
76. And those are his GOOD points, Submariner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Incredible.
Edited on Sat Jul-11-09 04:35 PM by Kingofalldems
Now waiting for Bush/Cheney's best DU pal to show up and claim 'Democrats did it too'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Despicable. Not surprising, but despicable.
That man should be behind bars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Agreed.
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, duh! Who else would it be?
I knew it was cheney the minute they started talking about it. I don't believe I can think any less of him than I do now, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Investigate, prosecute, convict
What the hell have we been waiting for? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. "What have we been waiting for?" The president....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Congress prosecutes.
Not Obamas job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. The work on his agenda, though.
He is the Party head and the President. He sets the aims, Congress does the work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. it's called separation of powers for a reason.
you are describing the way we had it under Bush. Congress doesn't do Obamas bidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #41
57. lol.
right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #41
60. "Congress doesn't do Obamas bidding."
or ours, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #60
74. true that.
either way, we're fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #29
67. No, the Department of Justice prosecutes, not Congress, and the DOJ reports to the President.
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 06:48 AM by eomer
The DOJ is part of the Executive Branch and is run by the Attorney General, who reports to the President.

Obama's statement, "but I believe we should look forward, not backward", which he repeated many times, appears to have been a directive to the Attorney General to not base decisions on the law and to instead take Obama's political perspectives into account when deciding whether to prosecute. Because so far there are no prosecutions and no signs of any work toward prosecutions even though there have clearly been crimes of the highest order.

Obama should publicly and privately direct Attorney General Holder to follow the law. Work on prosecutions should begin. If Holder will not follow the law then Obama should fire him and bring in someone who will.

So, in other words, you are completely wrong that Congress holds this responsibility. It is the Attorney General who is responsible and, as his boss, ultimately Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Atlanta Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #29
75. Are you suggesting the current Congress?
I agree that the current Congress can investigate and make its findings known to the Administration and the DOJ but this sitting Congress cannot take any criminal action against Cheney who is no longer V.P.

The roadblock to any criminal investigation of Cheney and others in the Bush administration is the DOJ and AG Holder. My hope is that the administration wants to get its two key pieces of legislation for healthcare reform and energy/environment through Congress before taking any action.

But I hope they do plan to at least investigate. What does it hurt to appoint and Independent Counsel to look into these matters? Sure it costs the taxpayers money but look at the millions wasted on Ken Starr looking into the Whitewater matter during the Clinton years. All that involved were possible financial crimes and abuse of power for personal gain.

Here we are talking about lies that cost lives and untold Billions in taxpayer money on a war of choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueMTexpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #75
87. There is FINALLY some movement towards the appointment of a Special Prosecutor.
:bounce: :woohoo:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/us/politics/12justice.html?hpw

The more information that comes out of Committee hearings and revelations like this have strengthened the Administration's hand. But it's been clear from the get-go that Cheney was not only running the show but that his scorn for the law and the US Constitution have been unparalleled. Now even wavering Dems ... and I am literally sick of such ... are realizing that the US Constitution is not worth the paper it's written on if such flagrant transgressions are tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
103. "Congress prosecutes"
Only in impeachment proceedings. It is the job of the executive branch (loosely defined--in a higher sense it is more the job of a largley independent Justice Department). It is right for Holder to act.

All this discussion, however, ignores possible war crimes proceedings before an international tribunal at the Hague, which is to my mind most appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #29
105. And he hasn't said "NO" to it? He hasn't publicly said it's time to move on?
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 03:31 PM by bobbolink
You haven't heard him say any of that??

You don't think he has any power over what the Congressional Dems do?

Really??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is this maybe why Cheney's secret service protection
has been extended by Obama?

Makes one wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mascarax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I wondered about that too
As in: what's coming out on Dick?

Honestly, he should not get away with this (and so many other things). He should be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer09 Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
42. Secret Service could be doing more than protecting
Secret Service could be keeping a close eye on Mr. Cheney. After all, we don't want him running away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
94. Making sure rogue elements in the CIA can't silence him when he goes on trial?
!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #94
100. I like the way you think!!.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. What more do Panetta and Holder need to get this show on the road
for consequences? The sewage of evidence is overflowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
77. Maybe They Want To "Move Forward???
I'd like to move forward alright, after the bastard is in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't believe it for one second. Dick Cheney is a prince of a guy, a
totally upright, God-fearing, community-minded super-citizen who is reverentially faithful to the spirit of the Founders while at the same time interested in and respectful of other diverse global cultures.

This article is just one more distortion of the liberal media from back east.

Now if you damn liberals will excuse me I have to go have the Hummer vacuumed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. WTF???????????????
Spying on congress?

Throw away the key
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. calling eric holder, calling eric holder.......
and who thought the president of vice was a 'do nothing' position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ok, so how much more evidence do they need to prosecute these bastards?
Damn, they sure know how to drag their feet on this most important issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. They could find a decapitated corpse and cheney with an blood dripping axe in the vicinity
and they still wouldn't arrest him. he's one of them, the elite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. It looks that way, doesn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #26
84. They've already found him with a shotgun and a face.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #26
90. Sadly agree.
“The Democratic Leadership Council’s agenda is indistinguishable from the Republican Neoconservative agenda,” - Dennis Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm actually starting to feel hopeful
They're releasing info on purpose. And extending Darth's protection for a reason.

Investigating a former administration sets a major precedent. That's what is holding them back. It cannot be seen as a partisan witchhunt. It MUST come from US.

It's not enough to write in here. Write to Holder. Write to Obama. Write to Congress.

We need to MAKE THEM DO IT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Regarding "we need to make them do it"
Isn't that implicit when we hired them to do their jobs?

Isn't the mere fact of voting them into office enough?

Must we now also hold their hands and tell them how to do their jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. If they didn't actively campaign on it, then yes we must make them do it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #20
72. obama said he would investigate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
92. Regarding "Isn't it enough..."
1. No
2. No
3. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. You are spot on. This cannot be seen as a witch hunt. Only way is through Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick and Recommend. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. I don't find this much of surprise...
That he did so. What will be interesting is whether or not the Obama Administration will bother to do anything about this, as well as take action on other previous administrative acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. well lo and behold, cheney did have all the power in the bu$h* white house?
who in the fuck did cheney think he was, president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Not the president, the president's boss. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
54. but of course
he would NEVER have been (s)elected on his own. he was very much in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. Because the hook brings you back...
I ain't tellin' you no lie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. I am a bit puzzled. We had a pResident so when was chainy given
the authority to tell anyone anything? VP Biden speaks for the administration and does not take actions independent of the president as far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. Who knew the Veep had the authority to
circumvent the office of the POTUS and order the CIA to do his bidding to advance his personal agenda? I'm blown away by the sklullduggery of VP half of the bush admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
30. Does Panetta even have the power to have it stopped.
Even though the Dick was VP, did he even have the authority to have given those orders? I mean, if the Dick went rogue with his little CIA assassination cell while in office, who's to say anyone in the government has the power to stop him? I firmly believe that the Dick has maintained control of someone or something in Washington since leaving office. I've always had the question in my mind; just why did he stay in the area, making his new home in Virginia? Why did he not go back to Wyoming or Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. And what are the consquences? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. Get Him!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greytdemocrat Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
35. Bastard!
"Darth" Cheney certainly has earned his nickname. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #35
91. Very Belated Welcome to DU!



:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
37. Everyone should be worried about what goes through Cheney's...
'Transition Office.'

YES, when the Obama Administration took over, Dick Cheney set up a "transition office." I do not know if anything about it hasn't been scrubbed off the web, but it was reported on CNN and was on the web when power changed hands. I remember thinking, WTF does he need a transition office for and what is he up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. So, now the question is: what did DimSon know, and when did he know it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. LOL! Link to MSNBC saying NYT has a story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #39
61. thanks & from your link:
"The Central Intelligence Agency withheld information about a secret counterterrorism program from Congress for eight years on direct orders from former Vice President Dick Cheney, the agency’s director, Leon E. Panetta, has told the Senate and House intelligence committees, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.

snip

"Efforts to reach Mr. Cheney through relatives and associates were unsuccessful."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/us/politics/12intel.html?_r=1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felinetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
43. Liz Cheney must be so proud of daddy!
Edited on Sat Jul-11-09 08:43 PM by felinetta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. After rereading the rules on conspiracy theories
I believe this needs to be moved to the 9/11 forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
45. Are we no better than the MOB?!!! Prosecute these assholes already!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
46. K&R - releated, newsweek reports Holder leaning toward appointing special prosecutor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wantoutnow Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
48. Why is nothing being done
Why does Obama not clean house? Treadstone was for real??? Real evil is entrenched in our government. To its core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Things ARE being done:

A) Panetta is getting the info out there
B) Congress is getting ready to set up hearings
C) Holder is getting read to assign a special prosecutor

This just came to light in the past few days.... My god, man... a prosecution like this doesn't ramp up that quickly.

Obama is not a dictator that can just say "off with his head!" and make it so by the next sunset.


Get a grip. Wheels are in motion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wantoutnow Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. I agree
but its been going on 6 months now into his presidency. Not just this new revelation. I suppose entrenched evil takes a while and some finesse to get rid of. Like scraping off soap scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. From the looks of it Panetta only found out two weeks ago (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #51
73. More like getting out mold buried deep inside shower caulking
you pretty much end up taking out the whole caulking and replacing it because usually you can't get to the mold to kill it with bleach or scrape it out. Long process and much work for just a few patches of mold, but if you don't keep it down, it grows much larger.

Entrenched evil will never be gotten rid of entirely, as it is part of the human fabric and always has been so. But there is no good reason not to occasionally punch entrenched evil in the gut hard. Show evil doers which way the wind is now blowing. Cheney would be a most excellent way to start this process of beating back the many evil doers, but it will take a heap of time. And I am still not sure it will happen, although I sense that someone at a minimum needs to be a scapegoat, and I think he is being targeted as the one who'll take the fall, simply because he was so hated by his own ranks.

Liz Cheney, just like her dad, has known all about this as she defended his behavior. She has been defending him because she too senses that the sharp knives are out for her dad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
49. Does anybody know the details of WHAT the program was? Is this the surveillance program?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Looks like it was off everyone's radar
From the way they're talking it's something that hasn't been in the news at all, which means it could be God only knows what.

One of my friends just said this feels sort of like someone next to you abruptly saying "okay, I think we're safe now" for no obvious reason...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. I have a feeling this is going to turn the nation's stomach when it comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. if it turns your stomach
it's got DICK cheney written all over it! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #49
79. No, but congressfolks are saying that when they found out
*some* of the details, their jaws hit the table. Dems and pukes alike were shocked by the revelations. There is no telling what was done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
58. Nobody had any idea...
Yes, of COURSE they didn't...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
62. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
63. Wonder if this has to do with the cheney
assassination teams? But that came out months ago. Whatever it is, it must be pure evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
64. Oh, my God! I'm so surprised
You just cannot imagine my shock. Surely not that paragon of virtue, Dick Cheney! He just wants to keep us safe from terror, er, terrorist, er, some shit, right?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
65. More fuel for the fire.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/09/AR2009070903017_2.html

Quote from article: President Obama has rejected calls from Democrats, led by Pelosi, to create a "truth commission" to investigate allegations of misconduct by Bush administration officials. The White House says such a body would foment a partisan battle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
66. Traitor, the man should be hung!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
68. FUCKING NO GOOD TRAITOR should be HUNG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
69. Traitors of Bushco, Inc. should be spending the rest of their lives in the crowbar hotel! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
70. What worries me is the 'wiggle room' on disclosure that Cheney may have
availed himself. It's about halfway down the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
71. Typical Cheney
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
78. Also - see the BBC news article - a good executive brief.
Cheney 'ordered CIA to hide plan'

Sounds like the CIA is starting to engage in serious CYA and obfuscation, and that Cheney seriously thought that the CIA would not hang him out to dry once he was out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
80. Can we arrest him now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
81. "Secret Counterterrorism Program"?
That's a really watered down moniker for the Assassination Squad, if that's what it refers to. :mad:


However, if there's YET ANOTHER program Cheney ordered the CIA to keep quiet about, then that's twice the reason for indictment!!!


:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
82. The million dollar question is this: Did Cheney conspire with the CIA (and others) to break the law?
If/when the MSM starts using the term "alleged conspiracy" for these activities, that will be the beginning of the end for the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
83. you can't just sweep this under a rug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
85. The SECRET SHIT??? Prolly was a way to keep the Presidency
permamently.....via Patriot Act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
88. How did it "turn up tips" if it was never operational?
How did it frustrate the FBI in following up on tips it turned up if the program was never operational?

Even the mainstream media screws up it's own coverup within one article!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
93. Death Penatly! Damn this monster and his evil heat straight to Hell!
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 12:16 PM by Odin2005
The CIA by definition MUST be apolitical. The slimy Neo-Con bastard... :grr: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mullard12ax7 Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
95. If he did it it's treason but if the current admin does it it's...
change we can believe in! It's masterful chess playing! It's necessary because we're at war! It's...fill in the blank with whatever slogan is being tossed around...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. As the article states
Panetta shut it down "immediately" upon uncovering it. Since these guys don't mind a little of the rough stuff, whatever it is has to be beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
96. But it's Dick Cheney! It's tmpossible for any charges of any sort to be brought against him.
He's 100% protected from prosecution by the secretive, "Cheney Immunity" law he instituted while in office.

Better let this go and move on to something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
98. Must be urgently time for giuys like Porter Goss & Company to start another pack of lies
in the MSM again, attack Pelosi, etc etc . WAPO and Fox would be a good places to start first thing tomorrow morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
99. Time for our "Department of Law" to put on their big boy pants
and prosecute this immoral cretin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Skeptic Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
101. Complete subversion of the concept of Democracy.
First of all, this program is exactly the kind of thing that those of us concerned with our rights have worried about as the obvious reaction to post-9/11 hysteria. We still don't have any real information, and we keep seeing, in relation to the unspecified program, the words "not fully-operational".

Getting to that in a minute, I cannot put into words how much it enrages me that the mere suggestion of any type of double-secret operations carried out from the direction of Cheney's office had been ridiculed by mainstream media for the entire Bush presidency. Now, eight years later, the truth begins to ooze out (and I still don't believe we'll ever get any real information about this program), and the media treats this as some new revelation that had never been considered while still going at ridiculous length to assure us, of course with quotes from unspecified officials from unspecified agencies, that this non-operational unprogram had no malintentions whatsoever, didn't have anything to do with domestic surveillance, etc.

So back to the "not fully-operational" issue. Panetta admitted he recently shut it down (note that we are assured there were no objections within the CIA) and that it originated very soon after 9/11, so at least we know that the unspecified not fully-operational program was in existence for roughly seven years. While it was not "fully-operational", the obvious corollary is that the program WAS in operation for seven years and while we are assured the program was NOT domestic, it's certainly not clear that the unimplemented aspects of the program were not domestic in nature. If this was a Cheney-led program, we can only imagine what aspects were desired but not implemented. Personally, I get flashes of Iraq-style nighttime arrests and indefinite domestic detentions, Americans hanging from chains in some dank basement, etc.

I fully realize that these concerns are a bit paranoid, but the shroud of secrecy covering all these matters leaves almost any door open, and I will not accept placations from unspecified officials from unspecified agencies that everything (and we can't define everything!) is hunky-dory. This is exactly what we were told to swallow for the past eight years, and it seems borderline evil to me that the media continues to push these assurances at us while this type of program was kept secret and categorically denied from the exact same type of sources during the Bush II presidency.

So, after all this ranting, I have one simple statement of action and ask others to join me. I will not accept any statement on policy unless it is accompanied by name, agency, and job title. I fully realize the flip-side of this and the limitations of what public officials can say to the public, but unsubstantiated statements from anonymous individuals cannot be allowed into arguments of policy because they are completely unaccountable and are too often used to bolster spurious arguments.

That's my opinion. I realize I don't write very well or concisely, but this is my first post in a discussion forum and I am trying to find a way to vent my frustration with the politics and media culture in this country. Or, as my Mom says, maybe I think too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. Great Post and welcome to DU.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
104. So the Shithead Super Force gets to OUT a CIA agent during a time of war
and yet...neverfuckingmind. This kinda shit just gives me a headache. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
106. Dick will not be charged with treason...
Section 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

I doubt what he did could be construed within our constitutional framework as treason.

But purposfully hiding a government program from Congress is a crime, as is lying to congress, missuse of government funds, murder, etc. etc.

Until we have some idea of what he did we won't know what his crimes might be. But treason should be removed from the table unless his program did something truely heinous like assassinating Senators Carnehan and Wellstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
107. Please, no new applications .
Being a Dick has been mastered by a dickless wonder from Wyoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC