The crazy monkey keeps the men and women under his command in harm's way when there's no need for them to be there.
What is the reason we keep sending patrols through Baghdad and the other towns?
What is the reason our armed forces have to take and re-take the same territory over and over again?
Why does Bush keep ordering more and more men and women into an unnecessary meat grinder?
None that I can see.
None that anyone has told me they see.
None that the Pentagon or any member of government has stated.
None certainly that indicate a threat to the security of the United States.
And all that this four-year war has accomplished is the ruin of the Army, Marines and Reserves.
When a readiness 'crisis' is a real crisisBy David Isenberg
Curiously enough, defining military readiness, or the lack thereof, is more difficult than one might think. For example, during the US administration of president Bill Clinton, Republican opponents tried very hard to convince the public that the military was in the midst of a grave "readiness crisis". In reality, the charges were as dubious and politically motivated as were the Cold War-era bomber and missile "gaps".
SNIP...
One of the newest and unreported signs of unreadiness involves something called C-ratings. Historically, readiness of US military forces at the unit level has been measured using the Status of Resources and Training System. Under SORTS, units report their overall readiness status as well as the status of four resource areas (personnel, equipment and supplies on hand, equipment condition, and training). These are readiness indicators based on the comparison of the resources that units have with the levels prescribed for wartime. The lower the number, the higher the state of readiness.
The readiness status of a unit is reported by assigning capability, or "C", ratings as follows:
C-1 Unit can undertake the full wartime missions for which it is organized or designed.
C-2 Unit can undertake the bulk of its wartime missions.
C-3 Unit can undertake major portions of its wartime missions.
C-4 Unit requires additional resources and/or training to undertake its wartime missions, but if the situation dictates, it may be required to undertake portions of the missions with resources on hand.
C-5 Unit is undergoing a service-directed resource change and is not prepared to undertake its wartime missions.
It has not been widely publicized that US units being deployed to Iraq that are rated at C-3/4 levels are being elevated to C-1/2 after only a couple of weeks in Kuwait, the functional equivalent of a military miracle.
Last December, CQ Weekly reported that US Army planning assumes that 37 of its 70 combat brigades are ready for deployment under its C-1-to-C-5 rating system. But the article noted, "A recent army document showed that all combat brigades
in the United States, even those next to deploy, are unready."
According to a briefing chart, 19 brigades that were next to be deployed were assumed to be at a C-1 or C-2 level, when they were actually C-3 or C-4.
It should take several months for a low-readiness unit to become ready for any combat. According to Winslow Wheeler, director of the Straus Military Reform Project at the Center for Defense Information in Washington, "The entire CONUS Army is in the crapper."
CONTINUED...
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/ID04Ak01.html
For his refusal to do what is best for the safety of the men and women under his command,
For his refusal to maintain the national security of the United States as commander-in-chief,
Bush should be found guilty of criminal dereliction of duty.
Bush should, thus, be relieved of command immediately.
All that commander-in-chief Smriko McCokespoon Bush has accomplished is get Americans killed.
10 U.S. troops die in Iraq; 6 on Sunday By STEVEN R. HURST, Associated Press Writer
BAGHDAD - The powerful Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr ordered his militiamen on Sunday to redouble their battle to oust American forces and argued that Iraq's army and police should join him in defeating "your archenemy." The U.S. military announced the weekend deaths of 10 American soldiers, including six killed on Sunday.
Security remained so tenuous in the capital on the eve of the fourth anniversary of the U.S. capture of Baghdad that Iraq's military declared a 24-hour ban on all vehicles in the capital from 5 a.m. Monday. The government quickly reinstated Monday as a holiday, just a day after it had decreed that April 9 no longer would be a day off.
Among the 10 U.S. deaths announced Sunday were three soldiers killed by a roadside bomb while patrolling south of Baghdad; one killed in an attack south of the capital; and two who died of combat wounds sustained north of the capital, in Diyala and Salahuddin provinces. On Saturday, the military said, four U.S. soldiers were killed in an explosion near their vehicle in Diyala.
At least 3,280 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count. The figure includes seven military civilians.
SNIP...
At least 47 people were killed or found dead in violence Sunday, including 17 execution victims dumped in the capital.
CONTINUED...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070408/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AhvTNGFrUq6kKB_xgSq7jc.s0NUE A couple more questions and observations:
Bush also is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
Why are they sent into combat without the equipment they need?
Why are the returning wounded treated like dirt?
Because the Treasury has been looted by Karl Rove, Jack Abramoff and Grover Norquist's buddies, it seems.
To top it off, Bush and his cronies LIED AMERICA INTO WAR!
C'mon Congress! IMPEACH THE TRAITORS!