Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we are going to change the recommend system I would like to see an "ignore recommend" feature

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:26 AM
Original message
If we are going to change the recommend system I would like to see an "ignore recommend" feature
I know there are a million posts on this topic already, but I think there is an important debate going on about the recommend system and the outcome of this debate will have a big impact on the quality of the posts that appear on DU.

This is an important issue and I think it is important that we discuss it rationally and recognize that there is no perfect solution to this issue but there have been important concerns raised on both sides of the debate. First of all it was clear that the old recommend system often made it really easy to push crap up to the top of the Greatest Page. All someone had to do was post "K&R if..." and they would get hundreds of recommendations that would allow them to pass up many really important posts that people put a lot of time and effort into. I think that most people would have to admit that there was a lot of crap on the Greatest Page that did not deserve to be there, it didn't matter which side you were on in a debate there was always an OP somewhere on the Greatest Page that made you embarrassed just to look at it. If there is one thing the unrecommended button will be good for it will be good for removing the crap that someone posted without putting any thought into it.

There is however a very legitimate concern that people are going to abuse the unrecommend feature. There are no doubt going to be some excellent posts that are voted down in mass by people simply because they disagree with what the post says. The number of recommends a post has does make a big difference in how many people read it so it is not a good thing that people can take steps to lessen the impact of posts they disagree with. This is a very serious concern and no one should dismiss it because there are some very important issues out there that are extremely controversial. If all the controversial posts sink because one side sends groups of people to unrecommend the post then we will be missing out on some very important discussions.

I think there are a few potential compromises that can be made to ensure that the recommend/unrecommend system can work without causing controversial posts to sink. First we should consider the idea that if you are willing to recommend something that means you should be willing to put your name behind it. If we could see who was recommending/unreccomending certain posts then perhaps with a bit of programming we could have a new ignore feature that would allow us to ignore the recommends/unrecommends of posters who we feel do not share our views of what constitutes the greatest posts on the site. I don't have anyone on my ignore list because I like to see what the people I disagree with are saying, at the same time however I have no reason to consider what any of these people recommend or don't recommend because I know that they don't represent me. If we could see the people who recommended/unrecommended each thread then we could determine if there are people who don't speak for us and whose recommendations we wanted to ignore. This would mean that the number of votes for each piece would appear differently for each member depending on whose votes they chose to ignore, but it would also mean that it would be more difficult for people to vote articles off our Greatest Page. I know this would require a good amount of programming, but if it is feasible I think it would help the situation a great deal.

Second, there should be a daily limit on recommends/unrecommends. There will be a few people who unrecommend every post they disagree with and recommend every post they agree with whether there is substance to it or not. Limiting recommends/unrecommends to five per day or so would make people think twice before hitting the button and would likely mean they would only vote for the posts they saw true merit in and save their unrecommends for the pure flamebait that does nothing to advance any cause.

We can improve the recommend system on this site, but we are all going to need to work together to find ways to perfect the system in ways that will ensure that we will see the best posts on this site rise to the top even when they are controversial while at the same time allowing people to limit the amount of crap that ends up on the Greatest Page. It is not going to be an easy task to perfect the system, but if DU can talk about changes they would be willing to accept and be able to listen to the concerns others have about those ideas we can probably find some common ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. I disagree with limiting the number of recs. You're aware that there are
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 12:36 AM by Tarheel_Dem
posters who post a dozen o.p.'s a day, and all with the same theme. I want to be able to unrec every last one of them. There may be some improvements to the new system, but I don't feel that limiting my option to move crap off the front page should be among them.

edit to add: Is there some special thrill in seeing one's o.p. on the front page? It's not as if debate is being cut off, you just have to navigate the forums, or even the Latest page for new topics of discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I would have no problem with limiting the number of posts per day as well
Most of the people who post a dozen threads a day do not put much substance into their posts, if people post that often they aren't taking the time to think before posting. I liked the three a day limit during the primaries, and I would have no problem if they brought that back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Where are you going to put the train tracks?
The ones you'll need to deliver the liquid nitrogen tanks you'll need to cool the supercomputers that will be doing all the table lookups every time somebody clicks on a thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't know how much programming it will take....
What I do know is that we already have ignore features on this site that can make certain people disappear from our pages, if they can do it in other areas I don't see why this is impossible. Yes it will take some programming, but I don't know that it would be as difficult as you make it sound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I do know.
You ain't getting that feature, no way, no how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The secret is in the multi-dimensional lookup table.
Automatically arranging DUers by 16 dimensions of statistically significant recommendation compatability. I wrote about it here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6029588&mesg_id=6029669
I picked at how to actually do this some time back, its a really interesting open problem to me. Some variation of it could be done though, even on a high traffic site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, you could write anything, but this site goes down NOW when it's busy.
The data center would be engulfed in flames with all that code running during high traffic times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. That's actually why its such an interesting question to me.
I think it CAN be done....But admittedly its a large abstract question and not DU's biggest fish to fry. I for one would love a simple AJAX version of DU, where ONLY the text from each OP is loaded, instead of loading these big old pages over again anytime I click on anything. That would make for some speedups, at least on the bandwidth front....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. You're right. As for bandwidth, I'd LOVE an rss feed for GD/GDP.
I never look at most of the threads anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I disagree. 17 dimensions are needed .nt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Oh, but how will I execute my secret plan to turn this into D-Harmony,
the webs largest online dating service for progressive Dems with 17 dimensions of proven compatibility???

oops: Aw shit, I went to e-harmony's site and it turns out they are now using 29 proven dimensions of compatibility. I guess my premise that 16 is the magic number is wrong. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. DU is more homogeneous than e-harmony? (that should be true but it rarely feels like it is).n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. You never know....
I tried the e-harmony free service once, and it only sent me people I am supposedly compatible with. What I didn't get to see was the strange people who are NOT compatible with me, the overweight Catholics with jello fetishes and such.... The REAL secrets of e-harmony are only known to e-harmony... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Low tech: Common sense, common courtesy, no plants, no resident trolls, no paranoid people
worrying about who "is worthy" of being on the Greatest Page, fixated on detracting and controlling what shows there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Shows there for a whole 24 hours. Woopie. Some are excited, apparently. n/t
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 01:20 AM by lindisfarne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Already got yer number. Your post makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Things stay on the Greatest for 24 hours. That's it. It's on the bottom of the main page. Point:
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 01:38 AM by lindisfarne
there is no point in getting excited about greatest page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. OIC. TY. Some of my truncated one line posts are misread too. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's going to take me awhile to get used to this. For example,
What about Sarah Palin's resignation speech? Even among people who like her, it's generally viewed to have been a disaster. For me, it was painful to watch. So should I "unrecommend" a thread that posts the video of the speech because I think it was so awful? Or should I recommend it, so it appears on The Greatest Page, because it's big news and other people will want to see it? That's what confuses me and I'm going to have to give this some thought... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yeah if you observe subtleties and lean toward "giving it some thought," UnRec is not for you.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Thanks, but I used it already...
After reading Skinner's thread (since I didn't get this at all), one thread immediately came to mind, LOL. I'm not planning on using it very often, since I don't think I should function as a judge about what people here can't read, but this thread, well, the video, actually, was just awful... x( And it's not something that other people will enjoy or benefit by seeing. Well, enough of my hints... ;) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. The first thing that came to mind
was sexist, paritcularly rape, threads, where serially abusers get away with murder. Those never make it to Greatest.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I'm assuming that the mods get to those in short order...
And they wouldn't appear in videos... x(

Shhhh... If you haven't seen this one, I shouldn't call it to your attention, or anyone's. It's not only vile, but it makes no sense... :eyes:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=334578&mesg_id=334578
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. in the past they have gone on as huge flamewars which I stay out of
the porn/rape addicts rule the roost there. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Well, that's a mark of your intelligence.
And also why you're still here... ;)

I thought that those were against the rules, or anything else that incited a flame war. Maybe I don't run across those because I don't spend much time in The Lounge, these days. Kudos to the mods for that forum... I was very fortunate, was a mod in LBN. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC