"Particularly hurtful and insidious is the most recent rumor -- which is entirely false..."

[Amerigo Vespucci]

EXCLUSIVE: Debbie Rowe Is Biological Mom Says Lawyer



Posted on Jun 30, 2009 @ 03:42PM

Reports that Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of two of Michael Jackson's children have been presented as fact by numerous outlets.

But in an exclusive interview with RadarOnline.com Rowe's lawyer Marta Almli sets the record straight and says without a doubt Debbie is the mother.

Almli told RadarOnline.com exclusively:"We refuse to be drawn into addressing the various rumors and speculation swirling in the media. The vast majority of what is out there is untrue.

"Particularly hurtful and insidious is the most recent rumor -- which is entirely false -- concerning the maternity of the children. Ms. Rowe is the biological mother of the two oldest children."

And there you have it.

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/06/exclusive-debbie-rowe-biological-mom-says-lawyer

[alsame]

1. What a mess. Those poor kids. nt

[whosinpower]

2. She is the mother

But she wants nothing to do with them. She admits that Michael is not the biological father, but states she was nothing more than a broodmare and is not seeking to care for her children, stating that her animals are her family now.

Those poor kids....some benevolent couple should adopt them and take them far far far away from the mess they find themselves in, and give them a chance at a normal life.

[monmouth]

3. And there's HuffPo streaming that rumor as if it were true. I'm very

wary of them lately, false and misleading headlines and stories. I'm not liking this new editor they have. I wish Arianna would get on this, her reputation is going to take a hit. I always liked HuffPo and went there often for news. Now, not so much.

[Amerigo Vespucci]

4. I've been having my doubts about Huffigton Post for a while now

They posted that story and pointed out the fact that the original link is now broken but didn't question the story's validity.

I'm afraid the time has come for me to be a little more selective about the Huffington Post content I post here. Quite often, when they link back to an accredited news source, I'll generally post the material from the source rather than H.P.

The flip side is when Raw Story posts Politico content and people here go crazy when they see "Politico" and I have to remind them "No, that is Raw Story excerpting Politico, not Politico. You either support Raw Story or you don't, and if you don't, send them an email."

:patriot:

[monmouth]

5. Agree, I need to be careful also...n/t