|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
drm604 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:03 PM Original message |
SUPERMAJORITY!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not with all the corporately sponsored Dems we have in the Senate..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. SUPERDISAPPOINTMENT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. sorry but the party head wishes to be bipartisan. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. He said he would "attempt" bipartisanship... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
E_Pluribus_Unitarian (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. Byrd's health issues loom on horizon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. my guess (I hope I'm wrong) = no supermajority fo'sho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. Wait-wait- I have some EXCUSES!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Oh, thank goodness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Dont worry- the powers that be are busy crafting "new" excuses as we speak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonn1997 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. Supermajority to me would mean 60 liberals, not simply 60 Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It's always something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. As long as we are moving the goal posts, lets make it 75 "hard-core, far left" Liberals!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonn1997 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. All we'd need is 60 liberal Senators and a liberal president. The extra 15 would be nice but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Hell- I've been told we needed all that just to get popular, mainstream stuff passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC