|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 01:51 PM Original message |
Filibuster-Proof: Tim Pawlenty to Certify Al Franken as Senator of Minnesota |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, it depends on how one defines "filibuster proof." Some in the Senate aren't reliable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. Finally! Yay! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. He's good enough, he's smart enough, and doggone it, people like him." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. i don't see anything in that article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. No but he has to certify. The article is just about Franken's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Has the court issued a direct order for him to sign? Because I think we all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I think that the order is implicit: He has to certify much to his chagrin nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. 60 is just a number and bears no relationship with being "filibuster-proof". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. No. We could have 70 Senators and STILL not have a filibuster-proof majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC