Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush DOJ Hunted for Democrats, Panel Finds (309 Indictments: 262 Dems, 37 Repubs, 10 Independents)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:29 PM
Original message
Bush DOJ Hunted for Democrats, Panel Finds (309 Indictments: 262 Dems, 37 Repubs, 10 Independents)

Bush DOJ Hunted for Democrats, Panel Finds



WASHINGTON (CN) - The Department of Justice under the George W. Bush administration took off the blindfold and aimed the sites of prosecution on Democratic officials, a panel of experts has concluded. The report announced Friday was filled with examples of a justice department that had become little more than a weapon with which to pursue political opponents and those not sufficiently on board with the right-wing policies of the administration.

Federal prosecutors "were focused on the man and not on the crime," said the Chief U.S. District Judge in Alabama, U.W. Clemens.

During a press conference at the National Press Club, Project Save Justice Executive Director Gail Sistrunk displayed a report by professors Donald Shields and John Cragan of the University of Minnesota that shows 85 percent of the indicted locally elected officials under the Bush administration were Democrats.

Of the 309 indictments of local elected officials, 262 were Democrats, 37 were Republicans, and ten were independents.

more at:
http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/06/26/Bush_DOJ_Hunted_for_Democrats_Panel_Finds.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. We knew that, but it's still nice to see it verified. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. How far have Dem congresscritters' heads been in the sand
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 07:36 PM by Robbien
not to know this was happening.

They sat by quietly.


AND allowing up or down votes on every Bush judicial appointee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Heads in sand and thumbs stuck up their own assholes?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Actually, this is probably why the Dems kept all that powder dry.
Fear of airing dirty laundry is second the oldest motivator in DC, the other being whoring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. recommended!! go to link for more related...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. good thing Obama didn't close Gitmo. Perfect place for these MFrs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R (NT)
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bring this up to a conservative,
and they will say it's because democrats are just more corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Isn't turnabout fair play?
I'm sure the republicans won't mind if we target every one of their politicians for prosecution since they seemed to think it was okay for them to do it. Let's get started! I'm excited!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Turnabout?
I wish our party had your spine. I'm sure Reid is thinking about sending bouquet of flowers to bushco for not prosectuting even more Democratic officials than he did.

Forget turnabout is fair play... The Democrats, from head down, won't even prosecute crimes if a republican committed it!

It's like we belong to the masochist party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. And I bet you can find a thread from our little ethics choir saying they'll help find the rope and

the tree for the US Attorney on each one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just like the class war, they prey on us, we "look forward"
we don't actually "move forward", that isn't allowed. But we can "look", as long as we don't look at all our options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Luckily AG Holder is overturning rethug convictions
While he refuses to review Siegleman. It seems Obama philosophy is to bring a pillow to a knife fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. "Sites"?
Good piece otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. Well I'm glad impeachment is FINALLY off the table...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. Excellent thread title. K&R for the return of justice. n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Excuse me - Justice by definition means "looking backward" and we're not allowed to do that.
A sickening politicization of justice. Which they were completely allowed to get away with. Which we saw on TV. Remember the hearings and all the pleadings of the fifth? To my knowledge NO ONE, big or little has been prosecuted for this. Not to mention umpteen thousand violations of the Hatch Act. Many are probably still in place, just waiting for the next Republican administration which will be sooner rather than later since we have done nothing to address election fraud. So I don't know what return to justice you are celebrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. You make a good point.
I suppose that, by the "return of justice," I meant to suggest that the Justice Department is no longer being used as a political weapon. In that sense, justice has returned.

I do not believe they should be allowed to get away with it. I do not believe that prosecuting those who did it would be a miscarriage of justice, not do I believe it would be using the Justice Department as a political weapon if we did (but you know the MSM would spin it that way).

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC