Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force Test Fires Missile(ICBM) From CA Coast(Hits Targets 4,200 miles away)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:29 AM
Original message
Air Force Test Fires Missile(ICBM) From CA Coast(Hits Targets 4,200 miles away)
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 07:29 AM by tekisui
Source: AP

VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. – The Air Force says it has successfully launched an unarmed Minuteman 3 intercontinental ballistic missile from a California base, firing it to targets in the Pacific Ocean.

Lt. Raymond Geoffroy (JEFF-rey) said the ICBM was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base at 3:01 a.m. Monday.

He said it carried three unarmed re-entry vehicles that hit their targets near the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands, some 4,200 miles away.

The Air Force said the launch was an operational test to check the weapon system's reliability and accuracy.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090629/ap_on_re_us/us_missile_test
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great, we're playing chicken with Teh Crazy
If anybody doesn't think that this was a warning to Kim Jong-Il, I've got some fine swamp, er, farmland in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yep. This, plus SK saying they are developing pre-emptive strike
capabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think this was a warning shot to NK. It could almost reach them,
and the US actually hit its target.

(snip)

Also Monday, the North criticized the U.S. for positioning missile defense systems around Hawaii, calling the deployment part of a plot to attack the regime. The North said it would bolster its nuclear arsenal in retaliation.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said he ordered the deployment of a ground-based, mobile missile intercept system and radar system to Hawaii amid concerns the North may fire a long-range missile toward the islands, about 4,500 miles (7,200 kilometers) away.

"Through the U.S. forces' clamorous movements, it has been brought to light that the U.S. attempt to launch a pre-emptive strike on our republic has become a brutal fact," the North's main Rodong Sinmun newspaper said in a commentary.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090629/ap_on_re_as/as_koreas_nuclear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let's hope L'il Kim was paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. 26-year-old son Kim Jong Un, I think Kim Jong Il is exiting stage
right soon, or already has. It is scary that a 26 year old son of a madman will be in charge of a nuclear arsenal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. maybe it was a warning to china,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bad timing BUT
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 07:45 AM by Statistical
The US launches a Minuteman 3 ICBM every year to test that no defects have occurred (most are 40+ years old). We have a reverse of about 40 with non-operation warheads but otherwise identical to the "live" ICBM.

The difference w/ US & NK is that the target was a US military missile range and the test was conducted with the permission of the govt of the Marshall islands.

Last year we launched one 5250 miles on 5/28/2009 so this is rather "routine".

I wonder how much money we pay the Marshall island to be a target for our ICBMs. "No I swear it is a dud ICBM. Trust me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLSurfer Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fairly routine but not often covered by the press.
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 09:17 AM by FLSurfer
Having worked there in the late 80's, I can still recall the missile launches and how we would go sit in a concrete bunker on Roi Namur til the missile splashed down.
Nothing new here but the press coverage.

Edit to say I think we only pay them about $55-60 million per year in direct payments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. They would have been more impressed if it was missile vs missile..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kwajalein Atoll is the usual target for routine firings
Sounds like an absolutely routine quality control check.

Kwajalein is also the place where anit-missile missiles are fired from, going back to the '70s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC