Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We are Little Sister, and we are watching us.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:04 AM
Original message
We are Little Sister, and we are watching us.
We are Little Sister, and we are watching us.

Little Sister is everyone who carries a cellphone with a digital camera that can upload pics and viddy to the intertubes. Little Sister is the “Macaca” who provided now former Senator George Allen an opportunity to destroy his political career. Little Sister is the 3 or more BART riders who viddied BART policeman Johannes Mehserle shooting Oscar Grant as Grant lay prone on the floor of the car. Little Sister is an emergent property of people interacting via the ever-faster global communications grid and all the technologies, software, and infrastructure that make, extend, and connect it.

In my opinion, Little Sister trumps Big Brother. To be a bit derisive about it, Big Brother is sooo Twentieth Century. Little Sister needs no Ministry of Love, no Ministry of Truth. Little Sister is distributed. Little Sister is every blogger, every person with a Facebook or a YouTube or a Twitter or Vodpod or Identica or whatever the lubed up social tool is the latest trend–o-ware to backdoor the Internet. Little Sister is every person who has an email account, even if that person is a homeless person who accesses his email via a computer at the Public Library.

Big Brother is top down, Little Sister is bottom up. Little Sister benefits from the flatness of the infosphere as it now stands, Big Brother must contend with it. Big Brother seeks total order; total control. Little Sister is random and nondeterministic, technology-enabled anarchy incarnate. Little Sister has the wide world under surveillance, yet defeats surveillance. Every discrete bit of Little Sister is like a subatomic particle: If you know where it is, you don’t know which way it’s going; if you know which way it’s going, you don’t know where it is. Big Brother is as often suborned by Little Sister as the other way around. I’m not saying that Big Brother is going away, but there’s a new gal in town.

Little Sister does have a significant, or shall I say signal, weakness: Her continued operation is utterly dependent on the Res Technica, the aforesaid global grid, the noose-sphere into which humankind has stuck its collective neck. Given a massive fail of any portion of the infrastructure, the blue screen of death awaits her, and we take the long fall.

more:
http://doctoromed.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/fox-reporter-bored-out-of-his-skull-at-tulsa-tea-bag-party/
via:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/21/745170/-Little-Sister-is-watching-from-the-rooftops-of-Tehran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. I love this. Little Sister is paying attention. Awesome! K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's like witnessing a special kind of birth. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psychic Consortium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. This force is unstoppable.
And will move us into the 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. But sadly, Little Sister has a counterpart, Little Brother.
Little Brother does things like taking surreptitious pictures up women's skirts and posting them on the intertoobz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbarber Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well of course, since all men..
Must be sexist, misogynistic jerks.

Sexism. It's a two way street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No. I was not implying that at all.
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 07:31 PM by Berry Cool
I was speaking of a specific negative consequence of our modern-day technology. Just one.

And by pointing it out, I was by no means implying all men were guilty of it.

If you have a problem with the OP implying that the positive side of modern technology is feminine (Little Sister) while the negative side is masculine (Big Brother), take it up with the OP.

Oh, and take it up with George Orwell while you're at it (although I doubt it will do much good). He was the one who came up with "Big Brother," so he must have been a sexist against his own sex.

Now, please take away the straw man you managed to construct out of my words and your own imagination. Thank you.

ed. slightly--you guess how
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. I like the idea, but you have an uphill battle to popularize the new definition ...
Edited on Mon Jun-22-09 04:43 AM by ColbertWatcher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC