Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FBI files show wide 'Deep Throat' investigation - The porn flick not the informant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:16 PM
Original message
FBI files show wide 'Deep Throat' investigation - The porn flick not the informant
Edited on Fri Jun-19-09 03:21 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
MIAMI – Newly released FBI files show agents across the country and at the highest level of the agency investigated "Deep Throat" — the 1972 porn movie, not the shadowy Watergate figure — in a vain attempt to roll back what became a cultural shift toward more permissive entertainment.

The documents released to The Associated Press show the expanse of agents' investigation into the film: seizing copies of the movie, having negatives analyzed in labs and interviewing everyone from actors and producers to messengers who delivered reels to theaters.

All of it in a failed attempt to stop the spread of a movie that some saw as the victory of a cultural and sexual revolution and others saw as simply decadent.

"Today we can't imagine authorities at any level of government — local, state or federal — being involved in obscenity prosecutions of this kind," said Mark Weiner, a constitutional law professor and legal historian at Rutgers-Newark School of Law. "The story of 'Deep Throat' is the story of the last gasp of the forces lined up against the cultural and sexual revolution and it is the advent of the entry of pornography into the mainstream."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090619/ap_on_en_mo/us_fbi_deep_throat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I find that
hard to swallow. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimesSquareCowboy Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm gagging at the very thought of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sick of their morality being shoved in our faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dramarama Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Come again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. herpes.
sorry, i'm not that clever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dramarama Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. A movie about an anatomical oddity?
Edited on Fri Jun-19-09 03:39 PM by MineralMan
What is there to investigate, I wonder...

Documentaries are always interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. See the doc film on the fascist/repub MPAA: This Film Has Not Been Rated
You know, the group of people who decide on which type of rating movies receive. They're all wealthy repubs/right to lifer types. Very revealing doc film on how they quickly drop their 'high brow' family values morals when it comes to making sure BIG movies that have R material get PG-13 in order to help profits...yet will give an indie flick an NC-17 for showing a woman's pubic hair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's one of my favorite docs - and great investigative journalism
It asks the basic question: Why are the people who have control over our rating system shrouded in secrecy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder how many times they had to watch it in order to, uh, investigate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC