Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hell may be fury yet to come for Sen. Ensign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 03:43 AM
Original message
Hell may be fury yet to come for Sen. Ensign
LAS VEGAS (AP) -- Sen. John Ensign has been quick to describe his dalliance with an aide in brief and simple terms. The affair is over. The apologies made and accepted. No questions will be answered, the married Nevada Republican said in his brief admission of infidelity.

But the first public statement from the woman once involved with the 51-year-old rising political star suggests more is brewing behind Ensign's neat account.

Cindy Hampton and her husband, a couple Ensign has described as "close friends," issued sharp remarks Wednesday through an attorney.

"It is unfortunate the senator chose to air this very personal matter, especially after the Hamptons did everything possible to keep this matter private," Las Vegas lawyer Daniel Albregts said in the statement. "It is equally unfortunate that he did so without concern for the effect such an announcement would have on the Hampton family. In time the Hamptons will be ready and willing to tell their side of the story."

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ENSIGN_AFFAIR?SITE=PAPIT&SECTION=NATIONAL&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. So he's had at least 2 affairs
"The disclosure resurrected questions about a two-week period in 2002 when Ensign abruptly dropped from public view. A person familiar with that episode, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said the senator told a close associate the absence followed an earlier affair."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I noticed that in an earlier article.
It seems that many people have missed it thus far.

Maybe he has a longer history of infidelity than anyone realized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He's GOP yakkin about family values - of course he's got a history
of not actually practicing them.

It's kind of like the whole closet gay Congressmen being the most outspoken about not giving GLBT their rights - those protesting the loudest normally have something to hide. As a group of people drawn to authoritarian "top down" controls, they are the ones who think there need to be rules for everyone else because they really lack those same self restraints in their own lives.

The more they squawk about the evil gays - the more likely they've got a boy (or several) in the background - the more they harp on "sanctity of marriage", the more the odds go up that they're serial cheaters.

It's become so stereotypical at this point, even Vegas wouldn't bet against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hammer meet nail.
Spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Three n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC