Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin Appeared On 'SNL' After Show Joked About Incest In Her Family

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 01:59 AM
Original message
Palin Appeared On 'SNL' After Show Joked About Incest In Her Family
Edited on Tue Jun-16-09 02:29 AM by democracy1st
The irony is that fellow late-night comics Jay Leno and Conan O'Brien have all made more jokes about Bristol's pregnancy without incurring the wrath of Palin and others.

According to the Washington Post, through mid-March Leno had made 15 jokes and O'Brien made 20 jokes at Bristol's expense, compared to 8 for Letterman.

The Post adds that Palin even appeared on "Saturday Night Live" after the show performed a skit joking about incest in her family, with comic Bobby Moynihan quipping, "Uhhh -- what about the husband? You KNOW he's doing those daughters! I mean, come on! It's Alaska!"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/15/letterman-apologizes-to-p_n_215927.html



Palin Gag? Comedy's All in the Mis-Timing

Did Sarah Palin not notice when late-night comedians were making fun of her daughter's pregnancy last fall, or did she simply get fed up with one-too-many cracks when a now-contrite David Letterman weighed in last week?


Bristol Palin, the Alaska governor's then-pregnant 17-year-old, was a punch line for almost all of the late-night TV crew -- Jay Leno, Conan O'Brien, Jon Stewart, as well as Letterman -- almost as soon as her mother was chosen as Sen. John McCain's Republican running mate.

On Sept. 2, during the presidential campaign, Leno, for example, told this joke on "The Tonight Show": "Governor Palin announced over the weekend that her 17-year-old unmarried daughter is five months pregnant. And you thought John Edwards was in trouble before! Now he has really done it."


On Oct. 10, O'Brien, then host of "Late Night," quipped: "Sarah Palin is going to drop the first puck at the Philadelphia Flyers hockey game. Then Palin will spend the rest of the game trying to keep the hockey players out of her daughter's penalty box."


While the pregnant-daughter theme was most common on late-night shows during the fall campaign, it has never fully disappeared. And Letterman told far fewer of these jokes than some of his late-night brethren.


Through mid-March, Leno had made 15 jokes about the Palin daughter's pregnancy, Stewart had told four on "The Daily Show," and Letterman checked in with eight, according to an analysis of late-night humor by the Center for Media and Public Affairs, a nonpartisan research organization affiliated with George Mason University.

The comedian most likely to bash Bristol Palin? O'Brien, with 20 jokes at her expense.

"Saturday Night Live" has also parodied the Palin family in questionable ways. In a skit last September, a mock reporter joked about incest in the vice presidential candidate's family, saying, "I mean, come on. It's Alaska!"

Palin not only didn't protest, she appeared as a guest on the program a few weeks later.




A more cynical view may be that Palin had more than enough media attention last fall, and that her Letterman broadside was designed to renew attention when the spotlight is dimming. Palin may even have been aware of a Gallup poll released last week showing that she attracted less than 1 percent of Republicans who were asked to name the "main person who speaks for the Republican Party today."

A spokeswoman for Palin did not reply to an e-mail seeking comment.

As a rhetorical strategy, Palin's timing actually makes a great deal of sense, said Richard Vatz, a professor of political communication at Towson University and a self-described conservative. Noting that the pregnant-daughter jokes had been dying down, Letterman's crack stood out, making him easier to isolate for criticism, he said.


So why did Palin ask Letterman -- and only Letterman -- for an apology? And why did she wait until last week?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/15/AR2009061503131.html?hpid=topnews

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. America went to war in Europe twice, so that means invading Iraq and Viet Nam was good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here is a very pertinent paragraph.


A more cynical view may be that Palin had more than enough media attention last fall, and that her Letterman broadside was designed to renew attention when the spotlight is dimming. Palin may even have been aware of a Gallup poll released last week showing that she attracted less than 1 percent of Republicans who were asked to name the "main person who speaks for the Republican Party today."

A spokeswoman for Palin did not reply to an e-mail seeking comment.

As a rhetorical strategy, Palin's timing actually makes a great deal of sense, said Richard Vatz, a professor of political communication at Towson University and a self-described conservative. Noting that the pregnant-daughter jokes had been dying down, Letterman's crack stood out, making him easier to isolate for criticism, he said.



On another post I said "I do not trust Sarah's acceptance of the apology. I wish I didn't feel this way, but knowing how she works, my guess is she set up this whole scenario of outrage (remember all the other cruder jokes that she let slide), and now she's working it to make herself look gracious.

"I don't trust her, I don't care how good she sounds. Everything she says and does is to benefit Sarah, you can count on that."






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep, that paragraph seems right on the money - thanks for pointing it out.
she is a slimy, despicable person, and certainly never to be trusted, even for a second.

And thanks again for your link to "Top 10 Reasons Sarah Palin's 'Outrage' is Misplaced and a Little Late"
http://shannynmoore.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/top-10-reason-sarah-palin%e2%80%99s-outrage-is-a-little-late/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. great
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Ding ding
we have a winner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Spot ON!
Attention whores will do anything to retain that attention.

the good thing that is happening is Palin will continue to make a fool of herself without thinking about the consequences of her actions. She believes staying in the limelight will make her a contender. when the truth is she will reveal herself as the self important stooge she really is. Keeping the gop looking like the rubber room escapees they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Repukes can only concentrate on ONE thing at any given time.
That is why their RW media gods like Beck and Rush are so popular. They can concentrate on TWO things! Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. they're so easy to fall in line with any bs no matter how big the lie
Edited on Tue Jun-16-09 02:30 AM by democracy1st
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldnslo Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Todd does look like he could be Sarah's brother........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Because those were during the election
And she was better off ignoring them. Now that she is being ignored, she wants the attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. Excellent analysis.
By George, I think you've got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Someone needs to send this thread out to the media, KO, Stephanie Miller and Randy Rhodes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is simply disgusting of Palin
I thought I remembered a heap of jokes about incest, thanks for putting them togther here.

So if Bristol was 17 when she was knocked up, does that make Levi guilty of statutory rape? Instead of just being a prospective young groom? Or is that another example of "hey, its ALASKA?"

That woman is ruining the Alaska I remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. No, Levi is not guilty of statutory rape.
Our statutory rape law applies to 13-, 14- and 15-year-olds who have sex with someone more than three years older than them. Bristol was 16 as was Levi, I believe, so there were no laws broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thanks, know some re AK civil law, but know nothing re criminal statutes there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. DU needs to limit Sarah Palin threads to no more than one a day
This piece of trash has gotten way too much attention as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Her hardcore defenders here should be REQUIRED to read this thread!
Too bad we don't have a "crickets chirping" smilie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Poor Sarah
Edited on Tue Jun-16-09 04:14 PM by nichomachus


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. yea like who in their freakin mind believed she practiced abstinence LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. The men and women in America's military are fighting for abstinence. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC