Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cantor faces off with White House over Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:01 PM
Original message
Cantor faces off with White House over Iran
Another rethug braintrust, making lots of noise, signifying nothing of importance. He has the balls to talk about 'moral responsibility'? He needs to take a good hard look in the mirror.

Cantor faces off with White House over Iran
By Bridget Johnson
Posted: 06/15/09 04:40 PM


The White House maintained its cautious tone on the disputed election and subsequent upheaval in Iran on Monday, while a GOP leader lashed out at "the administration's silence."

Meeting with the press before President Obama's speech to the American Medical Association in Chicago, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said, "I think there are a number of factors that give us some concern about what we've seen."

"Obviously we continue to have concern about what we've seen. Obviously the Iranians are looking into this, as well," Gibbs told reporters. "We continue to be heartened by the enthusiasm of young people in Iran."

The State Department said they "have doubts" about the election, but spokesman Ian Kelly said they weren't prepared to assess the election results beyond that.

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) lambasted the White House in a statement Monday afternoon, as reports came out of Iran of at least one protester killed in the tumult after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed a landslide victory over challenger Mir-Hossein Mousavi on Friday.

"The Administration’s silence in the face of Iran’s brutal suppression of democratic rights represents a step backwards for homegrown democracy in the Middle East," Cantor said. "President Obama must take a strong public position in the face of violence and human rights abuses. We have a moral responsibility to lead the world in opposition to Iran’s extreme response to peaceful protests.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/cantor-faces-off-with-white-house-over-iran-2009-06-15.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Someone get Cantor an enema before he explodes!
Seriously, anyone this full of shit needs an enema, pronto!

Nurse Jackie? Are you available?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did Cantor have anything to say about the treatment of
Amy Goodman et al at the Rushican Convention last year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. F***k Cantor
One person reported killed does not equal "brutal suppression", if it did then what was Kent State?

Cantor is a dick in every sense of the word, and has all the credibility of jack and shit, in my opinion.

To talk about moral responsibility, when I've never heard him say one word against the torture of detainees.

We have no moral responsibility to lead the world anywhere, this is not an empire and Cantor isn't Hadrian. We are one sovereign nation among 197 others, let some of them try leading the way for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I...don't think so.
I think the White House is well above and beyond facing off with someone of Cantor's ilk. Good publicity ploy on his part, though. Didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not wasting my time on the whole story but could someone summarize
What this bonehead suggests we do exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. He wants the US to get involved in internal Iranian politics under the
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 04:15 PM by babylonsister
guise of diplomacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Because that's worked out so well in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Summary
Cantor: Obama must get angry, blah blah, speak out, blah blah, our moral responsibility, blah blah, Obama must do everything within his power to stop Iran from getting nukes. (never mind that Mousavi is just as keen on continuing Iran's peaceful nuclear power program as Ahmadinejad.)

Lieberman: U.S. needed to be supporting the Iranian people demonstrating for democratic freedoms -- increase funding for Radio Farda, which broadcasts to Iranians in the same way that Radio Free Europe targeted residents behind the Iron Curtain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Lieberman actually has a sound idea there, but not real original.
Keeping the flow of information going is essential. Do whatever you can to help people gain their own freedom without messing in the politics of it or resorting to force, obviously (although probably not to Liberman). Eww, I just complmented Joe Lie-berman. I have to go bathe now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Eric Eric Eric
Didn't you learn ANYTHING from the elections, you idiotic douche whistle?

you can't goad Obama into doing something STUPID.

Look at what happened when those who are more politically astute than you tried!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cantor and Lieberman full of bluster. Democrats with a measured, wait-and-see attitude.
Who sounds more mature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a stupid headline - like Cantor has any power to "face off" anyone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sounds like McCain on Georgia.
Some meddling MOFOs.....in where the meddling does not good but make things worse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. What the fuck does Cantor want us to do? It's not like we have any fucking moral leadership.
After Bush's gulags and multiple condemnations by groups such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, I doubt the US is in a fucking position to lead on any morals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Toles toon
And it doesn't apply to just climate change

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. The President is way too smart to take this bait. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. We don't have the facts about the election yet. It looks a bit suspicious,
but it is difficult to change results from a loss to well over 60% win. Once the evidence becomes available, statisticians have reviewed the numbers and everything gets a little quieter, we will be able to assess the situation rationally. Why do the Republicans always react with their emotions before they know the facts? Nothing wrong with reacting emotionally if you are reacting based on facts. But we are here, and Iran is there, and all we know is what we hear from the statements of interested parties. I'm sure the State Department is watching this carefully and will analyze the numbers and the facts and make a statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. A lot of them are at it. And they're wrong as usual.
Thank God we have a sane adult in the White House and not these idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. Oh yeah, let's all listen to this lilliputian pipsqueak
Thanks for the input, minority party back-bencher. Here in Grown-Up Land, we kind of like to have facts before issuing all sorts of bellicose proclamations. See Mr. Cantor, it's your brand of knee-jerk reactionary saber-rattling that cost us so much money, lives, and standing in the world community. We don't really have the capital to live up to any of our moral responsibilities. War crimes and crimes against humanity will do that to a nation's prestige.

But let me just say, "Thank you for your concern, Mr. Cantor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. Shorter Eric Cantor: "Bomb 'em!" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. Let's send Cantor to Iran to address the protestors. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. Fuck you, Cantor.
You want to go over and stump for Moussavi? Be our guest--but you won't speak for the United States government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. Repukes fix the 2000 elections, drag us through hell and we are still
there - yet bitch about others unfair elections like they didn't do it first. That is a Repuke for you, if he can't say hypocrite then it ain't been done before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC