Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VFW weapons inventory request the Obama Admin supposedly sent out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 07:47 AM
Original message
VFW weapons inventory request the Obama Admin supposedly sent out?
Sorry if this was posted here before and it's simply an ongoing right-wing smear about "they're gonna take your guns." I'm hoping you guys can educate me, so I can educate others.

A few people I considered fairly rational brought this to my attention last night, saying the Obama Admin, just last week, requested from the VFW's that all members provide an inventory of weapons.

I realize the links below are VERY questionable, but I can't find official links to this story thus far.

I'm trying to find this in the various government websites, but I honestly am not sure where I should be looking.

They quote this "official" document, but there's no letterhead or anything in the links I cringed and clicked onto.

Total BS or is there a crumb of truth and they went wild? Any reputable news links would be most appreciated. :)


http://www.infowars.com/government-demands-inventory-of-all-vfw-weapons/

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS265&q=obama+administration+VFW+letter+weapons+inventory&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I just found this, but it's still not an official link:
It linked to a site that's down. Oy. I see it's crazies like WorldNetDaily perpetuating this, so I already have a feeling it's complete BS. I'm clueless about the matters being discussed, however. Maybe I should post this in the Guns Forum. Sorry if not GD appropriate.

06/11/2009 - 1:26pm.

Battle of the Bilge went directly to the source on the source of the email, Sgt. Dan West, USMC (Ret.), for comment and reaction. The following is his statement on the issue, which he has graciously allowed us to convey to you in full:

"In response to the article “Government Demands Inventory of All VFW Weapons” by Kurt Nimmo posted on the Alex Jones’ infowars.com website on June 9, 2009. Let me confirm that I did send out the email to VFW District Commanders in Texas so they would pass the request on to the VFW Posts they have oversight of. I have never been contacted by Kurt Nimmo or Alex Jones as to the veracity or authentication of my email. I find this to be extremely irresponsible journalism.

Let me also add that to my knowledge the U.S. Government is not trying to take away any weapons or equipment from any VFW Post nor is this an attempt by the government to register or list which VFW Post has what, they already know, they sent me the list, the weapons and equipment although demilitarized belong to the U.S. Government. Demilitarized is not the same as decommissioned.

Representatives from U.S. Army TACOM contacted me in regards to non-existent VFW Post as Texas VFW has had several dozen VFW Posts close in the last several years that had weapons/equipment ISSUED (Not donated) from U.S. Army TACOM. Before these missing weapons/equipment are reported as stolen, U.S. Army TACOM has asked that we assist in accounting for them as they may have been transferred to another VFW Post without proper documentation. If they have been transferred to another VFW Post that is fine it just needs to be documented per long standing and established TACOM guidelines.

Accounting for weapons/equipment issued from U.S. Army TACOM on a routine basis is nothing new and has been done for several decades. Any one who has served in the military is familiar with accountability for government issued weapons and equipment.

I would mention the Civilian Marksmanship Program is a program where the U.S. Government takes refurbished military rifles (M1 Garand’s & 1903 Springfield Rifles) and encourages civilians to purchase them for a fraction of their cost for the purpose of learning marksmanship. This is a program where the government is actually encouraging its citizens to purchase and posses a military firearm and learn how to use it.

It is unfortunate that some have decided to use this request to account for demilitarized (Not decommissioned) U.S. Government owned weapons/equipment as something it is not in order to press their own agenda without first verifying the information."

There’s not much more to add to Sergeant West’s comments except to thank him extensively for his quick response and detailed information. Once again, we see a normal procedure that has been in place for years misinterpreted as an attempt to get guns out of the hands of veterans. And once again we see that those with an agenda are placing the blame on President Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, I heard something about this BEFORE the election -
Obama wanted to organize a list of all guns used in ceremonies by the veterans groups. It semed to be a tactic to get us old dumb vets fuming at the commie gun grabber (and black) democrat candidate so we wouldn't vote for him....I voted for him and I am glad I did, and I am a gun owner.
I posted about this crap several times on some gun web sites, and oddly enough I am no longer welcome there even though I had been a contributing member of several for years.
When I announced I was a Democrat on one site, odd things started happening to my computer....

AFAIK, it's all crap.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thank you very much! :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. No mention of this on the VFW news page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I just found this. I don't necessarily recommend clicking...lol
But this right-wing blogger debunks this particular fallacy. He listed the Sargeant's address and phone number who is quoted in the various right-wing articles, and said he contacted him. The rebuttal I put above is from his post. I called the number to make sure it's valid, and it is. :) Answering machine though.

Maybe this will be on Snopes soon? Not that they believe that either......

For me at least, I can put this to rest. Thanks again. :)



http://brainshavings.com/2009/06/the-army-is-not-hassling-the-vfw.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. I've not heard of this, nor have I done any research, but...
Edited on Sat Jun-13-09 08:42 AM by liberalmuse
based from the source (right wing crazies), I can say with absolute confidence that this is a lie. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. sounds like wingnut bullshit to moi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC