|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:24 PM Original message |
Aravosis:Obama had a choice,And he chose to throw us under the bus, & then knife us for good measure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. WOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Well, they can't call Aravosis a PUMA. He was a solid Obama backer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
130. He was truly 110% about it, too. One of the earliest and most vociferous pro-Obama bloggers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. I want to see the document where Obama wrote all of this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:27 PM Original message |
How does it feel to want? Try being gay in America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
14. Geez, your the only person in America that has it tough! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Did I say I was the only person that has it tough? You give ME a "fucking break". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
79. whatever 'tough' you might have, I doubt it includes being gay in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:15 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. posted wrong place :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #82 |
102. sorry, bluebear. these dropdown comments are tricky. :) I hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Of course. I know my roguevalley! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
64. Deleted message |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
72. Enough of the scab mentality. You stand for what's right or you don't. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:15 PM Response to Reply #72 |
81. I agree entirely, readmoreoften. hugs to your partner. This is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #81 |
90. We stand together or we die alone. And don't come complaining to us cuz you're dying alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:28 PM Response to Reply #90 |
99. agreed. totally. completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
100. He's probably the only demo that doesn't have equal civil rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Look it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Killer bass! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
50. No sir, just four string fretted models. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. No "Portrait of Tracy" incoming, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Did Obama write that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
53. No, his hand-picked attorney did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #53 |
110. No. It was probably written by W. Scott Simpson, who's been handling such DOJ cases for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Of course the Administration has nothing to do with the DOJ, it is actually run by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. You have the document? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
77. It is at the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:14 PM Original message |
here is your document |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
117. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. Fuck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's unconscionable ........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. i don't like the ruling, but does he even have the authority to tell the DOJ or courts how to rule? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. The courts, not at all. The DOJ, limited authority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
59. That's the bitch - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clear eye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #13 |
126. But he can apparently tell Holder not to prosecute Bushco war criminals. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. DOJ doesn't 'rule'...courts do. This situation is about DOJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. yes, but i am asking if he has the authority to dictate their decisions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
80. Maybe not, he's only the boss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #80 |
109. there are limits to power you know. when bush had the attorneys fired it was highly illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 04:38 PM Response to Reply #109 |
118. Which explains why he was prosecuted and now sits in jail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 09:02 PM Response to Reply #118 |
122. so you want him to abuse his power too...hookay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
34. The DOJ should reflect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. i bet you a million bucks a bush-era hack is responsible for this. that said, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. No, he can't, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:53 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. thank you for the explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
86. actually, I think he can state good goals and have them pursued. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
10. Bullshit. A DOJ lawyer saying something is NOT the same as Obama saying it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. It's his DoJ and to deny that is ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. it's his DOJ, but legally, how much is he allowed to intervene? i don't see him as being personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. Hopefully, his DoJ is aware of his policy positions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. i'm sure they're aware of his positions, but if a bush-era holdover is arguing a case, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:53 PM Response to Reply #44 |
52. S/he's obligated to find a argument that suits the department. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:37 PM Original message |
With something this indefensible, it's all they've got. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
29. i don't see anyone saying that it's a good ruling. its a crap ruling. but what i see a lot of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. If you don't think the Attorney General reviews important bellweather DOJ cases with Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:21 PM Response to Reply #29 |
89. buck stops. honestly, I am surprised at this. This kind of vitriol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
33. There are going to be so many consequences here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #33 |
70. It's truly disgusting, no doubt the judge will not allow the dismissal based on those grounds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Has EVERYBODY forgotten so easily? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Obama is either the Executive or he's not. You pick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
78. So your argument is that the DOJ considers him a joke and he's too much of a coward to stand in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
83. Apparently Harry S Truman took his little sign with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
95. Personally speaking, my memory is quite intact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 07:20 PM Response to Reply #95 |
139. +10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. wait a minute... you seem to indicate that you detect some spin in the title! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Well, I am clearly quoting another website, maybe "ignored" will take that into account |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. You're right, that was true only when it was W's DOJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Bush had 8 years to pack the DOJ with his political cronies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
69. Well, he's been very busy out buying hamburgers and can't seem to find 5 minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #69 |
106. that's fucked up. also, you seem to think obama has dictatorial powers over his administration. that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 05:22 PM Response to Reply #106 |
120. Not dictatorial, managerial. Like how the BOSS determines how stuff is done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. Look, don't bother with the truth, whining is so much more fun! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Gay people = "whiners" now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Anyone can whine, gay straight you name it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
85. Complaining about people criticizing an official when he does something wrong is whining. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #85 |
111. Again, just what did Obama do? Let's see the document or hear the speach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #32 |
92. maybe, but straight people have RIGHTS that gay people only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
38. Saying Obama is doing this to you is whining! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. The DOJ is OBAMA'S department. Stop being so naive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:51 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. blue, i am sorry about this crappy ruling. but seriously, how much is obama legally allowed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. McClurkin, Warren, DADT.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. BB, is there some place, a site that has run down the cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. That I haven't seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Maybe John knows. I'm going to email him. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #65 |
76. Well, I did mail him. Maybe he'll get back to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #76 |
84. All these briefs seem to be filed at midnight, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #84 |
91. I know. It wouldn't be surprising if Holder is sitting up to his eyeballs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #38 |
73. Yeah, the DOJ works for Martha Stewart...not for the President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #38 |
75. Deleted sub-thread |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #38 |
93. he is the ultimate authority. he is the one who will carry the mark of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. Can you imagine if McCain's DOJ had issued this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #96 |
104. truly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #38 |
103. Well yes, he is -- and HIS brief is sickening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:56 PM Response to Reply #103 |
114. Now I read that a MORMON was tasked with writing the brief. Any more salt for the wound? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #114 |
119. Oh Dear God |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Do you need to attack the gay community a little more this morning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. I'm not attacking the gay community. I support the gay community. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:48 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. "Dragging Obama into this" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:52 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. You know, not one person can show where Obama did anything here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. So, your argument is that Obama is not in control of his government? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. the question is if a bush era DOJ lawyer disagrees with admin policy, can the president dictate to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I've answered that question and so have other posters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. other people onthis thread indicate he can't just tell them what to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. This is a government, not a game of Mother, May I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. he's not a dictator. i don't believe he has the authority to dictate to government lawyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Well, when Obama is back in charge of his own administration, please let me know. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #71 |
94. if what you want him to do is against the law, he can't do it. why are you unable to accept that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #94 |
101. It's not childish to expect the Executive to behave as an executive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam kane (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 09:56 AM Response to Reply #94 |
125. red herring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:27 PM Response to Reply #61 |
98. Matt Miller, Obama appointee, DOJ spokesperson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:35 PM Response to Reply #98 |
107. Tony West, Obama appointee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. ok, that's bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. So his own Justice department is a rogue operation beyond his control? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #58 |
74. Either way it's NOT GOOD. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 12:36 PM Response to Reply #58 |
131. Or completely under his control. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:48 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. You are not supporting the gay community this morning, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:26 PM Response to Reply #42 |
97. god, dragging? Last time I looked he was pres and thereby responsible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Would you please stop with the vicious anti-semitism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. the question is, is it legal or even possible for him to prevent a bush-era hack in the doj from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #35 |
112. When Nixon wanted to stop the DOJ he had to fire the AJ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wind Dancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
47. Pisses you off? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
88. the buck stops with him. period. when Truman integrated the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #88 |
138. Point of information:Truman did not integrate the military.The Army said "no" to his executive order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
115. This thread is more about Obama then it is about the case before the DOJ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 08:27 PM Response to Reply #115 |
121. Poor Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
22. John is right. The Obama DoJ is piling up ammunition for the wrong side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
87. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensible321 (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-12-09 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
113. One More Group Obama Has Betrayed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
123. Someone please clear this up for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 01:08 AM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Well, Obama's DOJ chose to compare it to incest & marrying children... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #124 |
132. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cagesoulman (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
127. Can I just say Rick Warren? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doc Martin (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
128. Please disregard... I cannot find way to delete my message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #128 |
134. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
torbird (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
129. So... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. >my white, straight, married, Christian ass need his help for our issues< You poor thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 04:05 PM Response to Reply #129 |
135. You know what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 07:26 PM Response to Reply #135 |
140. +100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-13-09 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
137. The feds are always striking down state laws as discriminatory, esp voting laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC