|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:21 AM Original message |
Idaho gun enthusiasts target Natl. Guard tanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. I wish.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It seems to me that they would be within their rights to do that. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ManiacJoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. HE rounds would have a better chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Beehive time would be even better.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Tanks don't shoot beehive (APERS-T) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Same story....different version..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Don't ever call a howitzer a "tank" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. If I remember correctly, us old tankers had a beehive time round... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. The 105mm tanks did have beehive waaay back in ancient times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. And I am an ancient tanker..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Are you sure you're not a Redleg? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Same thing at the club at Ft. Knox.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. "And so rides back to drink again..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
3. gee, I wonder if any of the shooters are (well, WERE) "law-abiding gun owners" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. Probably not. What's your point, Scout? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
4. Their ARE NOT, "enthusiasts" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lautremont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. "Over-enthusiasts," perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. No, just some fucking assholes shooting illegally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. It doesn't cost us dearly at electiontime, not counting votes hurts us dearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. That's always been their sacred cow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. The "sacred cow" is the bill of rights...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 07:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. The bill of rights says nothing about guns outside WELL regulated miltias |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Regulated = trained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Here's the dictionary definition of regulated, doesn't say a word about trained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 08:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Current meaning, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Guns were a bit different 250 years ago too...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dairydog91 (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 09:51 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. So was the press... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Logical extension to that metaphor is that A-bombs are covered by the 2nd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dairydog91 (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-06-07 07:10 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-06-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Weren't we talking about the 2nd Amendment?.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dairydog91 (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-06-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. You can't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. It was the Roman meaning, the old English meaning and the meaning today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dairydog91 (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 09:40 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. The BOR says nothing about.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. Still Roving for the GOP? Listen to Clinton regarding guns and Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dairydog91 (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. Really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 07:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Fred who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dairydog91 (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Fred This... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
34. it's the same thing as calling illegal poachers HUNTERS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. poachers. meh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncle ray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. it just proves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Not so rural |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. Not "enthusiasts" -- criminals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. More law enforcement for these idiots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
25. Isn't firing on American troops treason? Isn't that what happened at Ft. Sumter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
31. One day one of those tankers will fire back... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MazeRat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-06-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
50. I was thinking the same thing... hopefully it will show up on youtube for all to see -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. Terra! Terra!! Terra!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
42. too funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Wing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
46. Let the Nat'l Guard shoot back, practice is never a bad thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-06-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
51. Fun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCappedBandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-06-07 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
52. I bet these are the same people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC