Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The other recess appointments....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:25 AM
Original message
The other recess appointments....
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 09:32 AM by Mind_your_head
With all of the talk about Sam Fox as U.S. ambassador to Belgium, *I* sort of missed the importance of the other recess-appointments. Now that I see who they are, Andrew Biggs and Susan Dudley, let me say that I am shocked and appalled, but NEVER surprised by *co's choices.

<snip>

The president appointed Andrew Biggs to serve as the next deputy commissioner of Social Security, despite the fact that Biggs is an aggressive advocate of privatizing the Social Security system. His nomination in November was considered ridiculous by Senate Democrats, and with this recess appointment yesterday, Bush effectively announced that he no longer wants to even consider negotiations over reforming the system.

And then there’s Susan Dudley, who Bush appointed to oversee federal regulatory policy at the Office of Management and Budget, despite her anti-regulatory career at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs holds sway over federal regulatory agencies like the EPA and helps set regulatory policy for a wide range of issues, from workplace safety to water quality….

As the director of regulatory studies at the industry-backed Mercatus Center she has worked to oppose vital public health regulation as a “hidden tax” that hinders profits.

Some of her targets have included EPA health standards for smog, opposition to lower-polluting cars, opposition to air bags, and opposition to stronger regulations for arsenic in drinking water. For some reason, the Senate had some concerns about her nomination. The White House not only doesn’t care about the concerns, it also decided it doesn’t care about the constitutional nomination process.

</snip>

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/05/the-other-rece... /

(bolding is mine)

on edit: Hey, where'd my bolding go??? Fixed now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cronyism at it's best....
Qualifications....

We don't need no stinkin' qualifications...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Technically they are qualified.
Qualified at getting rid of the departments they are being put in charge of. The Grover Norquist theory of government.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The only qualifications shrub appointees need is
to be pro-business and pro-privatization.

Money is the end-all, be-all for them - everything and everyone else be DAMNED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. bush* is hard at work undermining any form of gov't. oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. I see the foxes are still guarding the henhouses...
Just when you think they cannot possibly do anything scummier, they go and do just that...

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC