Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

COMEY: Bush Able To Get Legal Authorization From DOJ-For WHATEVER It Wanted-Regardless Of Legality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 04:15 PM
Original message
COMEY: Bush Able To Get Legal Authorization From DOJ-For WHATEVER It Wanted-Regardless Of Legality
Edited on Mon Jun-08-09 04:33 PM by kpete
Most revealingly, Comey described exactly what was happening with this process: that the White House was demanding and pressuring the issuance of these memos, but that once the torture regime became public -- as Comey warned that it would -- White House officials would defend themselves by heaping the blame on Gonzales and other DOJ lawyers, deceitfully pretending that they were merely following in good faith DOJ advice about what was and was not legal.

Alluding to the extreme pressure that had previously been exerted by the White House on then-AG John Aschroft to legally authorize the illegal NSA spying program (the Ashcroft Hospital Drama), Comey lamented that even the minimal willingness of Ashcroft to defy White House pressure was completely lacking in the Gonzales-led DOJ and OLC -- meaning the White House was able to get legal authorization from the DOJ for whatever it wanted, regardless of whether it was actually legal.



Most revealingly, Comey described exactly what was happening with this process: that the White House was demanding and pressuring the issuance of these memos, but that once the torture regime became public -- as Comey warned that it would -- White House officials would defend themselves by heaping the blame on Gonzales and other DOJ lawyers, deceitfully pretending that they were merely following in good faith DOJ advice about what was and was not legal:


more:
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2009/6/8/16570/32099

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/06/07/torture_memos/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was pretty obvious to us as far back as 06...how dim IS Gonzales?
Jeez, it's in the plot of any number of movies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Remember disgraced Republican Congressman Bob
Ney? He now has a radio program, last week he said Alberto Gonzales should agree to be water-boarded if he doesn't think it is torture. He also said Bushco lied to Congress to get us into war in Iraq. Bob Ney almost sounds like a liberal Democrat now after his stay in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Comey was ready to sing then....
I bet he's ready to belt out
an entire opera by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Comey and Goldsmith are not angels in this.
Merely somewhat "less bad" war criminals themselves.

When it's torture, lamenting that you haven't "carried the day" is simply not good enough. Nor is silent resignation or resignation with sneak leaks.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Really? Did you read "Palace Revolt"?
http://www.newsweek.com/id/57101

James Comey has five kids. His wife does not work outside the home. If he was willing to quit a government job (at which he was not getting rich at,) over what he was seeing, he's not the enemy.

Then again, I'm sure there will be those here who will figure out a way to twist this, too. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes, really. And "palace revolt" is obliviously accurate...
...because it raises the luxurious concerns of a cloistered aristocracy above the very real life and death -- as in innocents tortured to death -- reality of the atrocities they failed to avert.

Abiding by and enforcing the laws and treaty obligations that our greater generations fought and died to forge is not a career option or lifestyle choice.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. And didn't James Comey and Jack Goldsmith do those things?
>Abiding by and enforcing the laws and treaty obligations that our greater generations fought and died to forge is not a career option or lifestyle choice.<

I watched Comey's testimony before (IIRC) the judiciary committee. I think it was the most important television since the broadcast of the Watergate hearings.

He wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He fought like hell to stop Gonzales, Cheney and Bush. There's lots of people with the family he has that would have walked away, rather than risk their livelihood. He fought them. So, surprisingly enough, did Ashcroft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Of course not. Not even close.
The subject of discussion here is torture and war crimes.

That testimony and the Ashcroft incident were about illegally spying on Americans. And even in that case all he did was to refuse to comply with an even worse program (still unknown) than what he had already "approved" -- after-the-fact -- to circumvent the FISA laws that had protected us for decades.

His similar quibbling about just how much torture was too much torture (he "drew the line" at combined tortures) just made him a willing participant in an ongoing program of war crimes -- where criminality begins at "degrading" treatment, long before torture is applied. He's done nothing to change that simple reality.

Moreover, none of his acts were "preventative" in any way. All he did was attempt to limit just how many of the atrocities would be legalistically rationalized after the fact, to provide a fig-leaf cover story for the other conspirators.

And those other people who "would have walked away, rather than risk their livelihood" would also have been violating the torture laws. There is an affirmative duty on ALL gov't official to report any suspicion of torture and to ACT to stop it in any way that does not risk death or grievous bodily harm.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. typical for a trust-slug, even with people's lives, they're insane
selfish, always blaming others while enjoying a dictator's position. Can't say no to them(or you're out of a job & wait till you're stabbed in the back,too) but it's ALWAYS not their fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am starting to see why...
Cheney has been so vocal, something he said shortly after he started speaking out, someone asked him why is he doing this and he said it is to protect the little guys. The little guys he speaks of is the inner circle at the OLC they called themselves the “War Counsel” John Yoo, Bybee, Gonzales, and his main guy, forget his name now. If the Dems were smart they would put the pressure on Bybee via impeachment, pressure to disbar Yoo, and go after Gonzales someone will squeal. These guys had a direct link to the VP’s office. Something I learned via research on a paper this quarter. Cheney knows he has to try and defend them, he is afraid they will turn and start talking if brought under scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC