Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Given the rumors out of S.C. should Lindsey Graham resign from the Air Force Reserves (DADT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:05 PM
Original message
Poll question: Given the rumors out of S.C. should Lindsey Graham resign from the Air Force Reserves (DADT)
From: an interview with Linda Ketner http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/30/blue-america-meet-linda-ketner/

"I asked her if she thought being upfront about being gay, even campaigning with her partner of 9 years, Beth Huntley, impacted the race. "When you lose by such a tight margin, anything could have played a role." In focus groups she found that people didn't care about her personal sexual preference but respected her honesty. "We have more gay people serving in South Carolina than probably in anyplace in the United States; they're just not out of the closet. We have an awful lot of people in the closet-- Lindsey Graham, Glenn McConnell who's our Senate president pro tem, our Lt Governor... I obviously lost the conservative, religious crazy vote, but I would have anyway because I'm pro-choice... It got more national attention than it did local attention; it was no secret to anybody around here." She actually won in Charleston County."

I do think someone needs to ask Graham 1) to state his position on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and 2) what his response to the rumors is.

So I must ask should Graham resign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. He only would legally have to resign if he admitted the rumors were true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Wrong. If someone else reports on him, even if he denies it, he's gone.
You don't have to admit shit. There just needs to be one person willing to swear that you're gay--nothing else.

See the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. So, is there anyone who is willing to testify under oath that they know for a fact that he is gay?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. No, if someone else gives evidence he is gay -
"cuz I said so" is not evidence.

Now, if there is a SECOND person who corroborates the first, THEN he's gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Tell that to this guy:
http://www.2news.tv/news/local/46278087.html

BOISE - His entire 18 year professional career has been in the U.S. Air Force, most recently stationed in Mountain Home.

But now, Lt. Col. Victor Fehrenbach is being discharged for homosexual conduct.

Speaking only to CBS 2 Eyewitness News, Fehrenbach says he's gone through every single emotion imaginable, saying that being kicked out of the military has been "utterly devastating."

"I played by the rules," he said. "I did my part. I kept my private life private. Again, this wasn't voluntary. I didn't come out and challenge the law. In some ways the law challenged me."

...

Fehrenbach says he is a combat veteran of three wars. He says the investigation actually began a year ago after a civilian turned him in to Air Force officials. It wasn't until last week that he says he finally came out not just to his colleagues, but to his family, too.


He didn't admit anything, but they investigated him on the word of ONE civilian. One. And we all know that once it's to the point of an official investigation, you're already gone. They're just looking for paperwork fodder to make it legit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Staph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. One knowledgeable person can sink him.
Sexual orientation will not be a bar to service unless manifested by homosexual conduct. The military will discharge members who engage in homosexual conduct, which is defined as a homosexual act, a statement that the member is homosexual or bisexual, or a marriage or attempted marriage to someone of the same gender.

– quoted in "The Pentagon's New Policy Guidelines on Homosexuals in the Military", The New York Times (July 20, 1993), p.A14.


I read this to say that if any person has knowledge of Graham's engaging in homosexual conduct, and that person is willing to share that knowledge, then Senator Graham will be dishonorably discharged. Based on some of the cases that Rachel Maddow has been reporting on lately, he won't have any options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWorldJohn Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. he was “outed” by a stream of anonymous e-mails ............
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14052513/

OHNSON CITY, Tenn. - A decorated sergeant and Arabic language specialist was dismissed from the U.S. Army under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, though he says he never admitted being gay and his accuser was never identified.

Bleu Copas, 30, told The Associated Press he is gay, but said he was “outed” by a stream of anonymous e-mails to his superiors in the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, N.C.

“I knew the policy going in,” Copas said in an interview on the campus of East Tennessee State University, where he is pursuing a master’s degree in counseling and working as a student adviser. “I knew it was going to be difficult.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hell no!
DADT is stupid and obsolete. :grr:

Besides, if he resigns, he can't be called up and deployed to a dangerous combat zone in Afghanistan. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. IF he is gay, and a service member, the same rules that apply to everyone else
Edited on Wed Jun-03-09 02:14 PM by old mark
should apply to Mr. Graham. If they do not apply DADT to him, it should not be applied to anyone else ever again.
No one is above the law, even if the law is stupid.
It is stupid and should be changed immediately, but it is in effect at the moment, so he should be discharged.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have a follow up question, what happens to service members who are presumed to be gay?
Are they questioned by superiors or is action taken only after they come out of the closet. I ask because I want to know if anyone has been forced out based upon suspicion/rumor/allegations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think it is called, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" for a reason...
They are not supposed to ask you, you are not supposed to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not sure what position Graham takes on DADT...
but his sexual preference is his business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. No. Bogus law is bogus.
People deserve equality. Even Republicans who might be gay. That's what this country is about. We don't get to pick and choose who gets equal rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I would agree, however how do you feel about someone who could impact the law. . .
. . .standing silent and watching other folks having to deal with its consequences?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They shouldn't have their rights impaired.
My feelings shouldn't change that. If you have a different idea for how they should be dealt with, that would be a different poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Starry, I agree with you.
The law is bad regardless of who it impacts upon. That said ~~ Graham, IMO, most likely is gay and he is a hypocrite of the first order for what he is doing on this subject. I could not care less if he is or is not gay ~~ I do care, however, about having an asshole like this in a national office who is such a HUGE hypocrite. Dishonesty, total dishonesty, on this and that is why I find him offensive.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well, absolutely.
Edited on Wed Jun-03-09 03:06 PM by Starry Messenger
:) I agree with you as well. A little time at Camp Humility certainly wouldn't hurt him. But I wasn't sure where the OP was going with this. A lot of our politicians are dishonest, but I don't think meddling with their rights is the way to go. Except their "right" to be in office and to be publicly criticized if they are being hypocrites. That we can vote on and write about. :D I'm all for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Seems like an investigation is in order
After all, even though we have DADT, it seems like the army is still conducting "witch hunts," which were supposed to be forbidden under DADT (or so we were told). Since an accusation of homosexuality has been made, the army needs to follow through, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. No the military needs to stop discharging gay service members.
The law needs to be changed and the President needs to stop the discharges of everyone, even Republican closeted gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Well, I definitely agree with that
I was just trying to be a little snarky. There are few things in politics that I dislike than anti-gay gays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. I could not care less if he is or is not gay...
... but he is an asshole of the first order and should not be allowed close to the human species for any reason.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. On the positive side...he won't re-produce !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Now THAT is a positive thought! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. Definitely voted he should not have to resign, even though this is a question
based on a reckless rumor.

Civil rights (especially this evil DADT discrimination), should absolutely not be implemented, based and altered on political affiliation .. even if the person in question is a pathetic scumbag.

Why would you insinuate someone should lose their title based on a rumor?

I'm fiercely opposed to discrimination across the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. He'd have to "tell" and he hasn't. So, no.
Seems elementary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. No one should be forced to resign from the military for being gay. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think this topic deserves a public debate
But is anyone bold enough to bring it up on TV?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
27. If Lindsey came out of the closet. He would need Secret Service protection in South Carolina
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. i'm guessing because HE isn't the one "telling" nothing happens
and they aren't allowed to ask him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sexual preference has nothing to do with combat readiness. If it did, a whole
lot of battles in ancient Greece would have turned out differently.

I am not convinced that Graham is gay, however. A lot of southern men who talk the way he talks are straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC