|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:21 PM Original message |
DA speaking after Scott Roeder arraignment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. What?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Would domestic terrorism be a state or federal charge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I want him in a federal prison cell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Domestic terrorism would be a federal charge and not filed by a DA and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. NOT a death penalty case? I do not understand that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Ected (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. My Favorite Mouth Breather: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Mug shot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 04:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. He looks less neanderthal in that pic than he did in the arraignment video! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shrek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Under Kansas law, "capital murder" applies only in specific circumstances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 08:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Maybe it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. No domestic terrorism charges like they laid on the guy who shot the 2 recruiters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shrek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Kansas terrorism statute is specific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
8. Betcha they can't seat a jury who will convict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 04:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Good point. You might very well be right--if they went for the death penalty nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
9. Phone number of abortion clinic bomber on his dash board. Conclusion: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. Good to see which side the DA is on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 04:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. To be fair to her, she did say something like "at this time." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. Kansas?.....I'm betting he walks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-02-09 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
19. Maybe the feds could have a separate trial under something having to do with terrorism? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC